So there's only three possible objective scorecards. Anything else is a lie to save face. So how did you have it? Let's get to the bottom of this.
Fury 116-110
Fury 115-111
Fury 114-112
Clean punching, effective aggression, ring generalship and defense he was far ahead in all in a bare minimum of 8 rounds but most likely 10.
I scored it 114-112 in the arena.
Watched it back twice, the first time I watched it objectively and scored it 115-111 to Fury.
The second time I tried to embrace how two of the judges could produce such strange scorecards so gave every round I conceivably could to Wilder and came up with 113-113.
The 115-111 Wilder card is atrocious!
In my personal opinion:
Rounds Fury could conceivably be awarded:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11
Rounds Wilder could conceivably be awarded:
2, 8, 9, 11, 12
113-113 is incorrect but justifiable.
114-112 to 116-110 are acceptable and somewhere in between is probably the correct score.
Let's say Carlos baladimir knocked Floyd down twice, or Robert guerro did
What would the scorecard be? There's no way wilder deserved draw just like baldomir wouldnt
.
Fury didn't blow out Wilder in any one round though, especially early, lol
Let's say Carlos baladimir knocked Floyd down twice, or Robert guerro did
What would the scorecard be? There's no way wilder deserved draw just like baldomir wouldnt
.
I will go with exactly how Fury himself scored the fight 114-112. But to say there are only three possibilities is wrong. There is certainly an avenue to get to 113-113. But to get to 115-111 Wilder? Nope.