Wilder v Fury 2 Way Rematch Clause?

Yes yes, you would have preferred if I wrote several. Problem for you is that you're trying to argue an opinion and I don't argue opinions, only facts. It is your opinion that several would better describe three than many. Congratulations. This is definitely something to hang your hat on. I'll rest safe in the knowledge that the English language and the comprehension of it seems to rest safely in my corner. Given how much you lot have butchered it anyway I can't say I'm surprised. You must be the only person on this whole forum to describe an account made in 2016 as being "many years old" Anyway.. this has gone on long enough. I'll poke at you about more trivial and unnecessary topics in the future. Have a good day.

No my argument is about the fact that you wrote many.. Yes yes, you would have preferred if I wrote several. Problem for you is that you're trying to argue an opinion and I don't argue opinions, only facts. It is your opinion that several would better describe three than many. Congratulations. This is definitely something to hang your hat on.

Think about how weak your argument must be, that your complaint is that I wrote "many" instead of "several." My sincerest apologies. Anybody can look up the registration date of an account. It's not like it's a secret. No my argument is about the fact that you wrote many.. through a bloated sense of self importance and machismo, specifically mentioned that account and did so knowing it was completely misleading and untrue. Surely someone of your keen mind knew what account you were referencing and that the statement you gave was Incorrect. For someone who operates under the guise of complete truth and sincerity.. you sure like deferring blame when you get caught out in your own bravado. Coulda just owned up and said you got caught out..but instead you went on a crusade of ignoring me until I kept pressing, followed by contradictions..then excuses..and now finally we're reaching the phase of denial. Maybe we'll reach that phase of acceptance but I doubt you can get your bloated ego out of your way and realise that you're losing the very type of debate you think you're so great at. Don't be literal about absolutely everything if you cant take what you dish out.. you're coming off like a real pu55y.

So how does the WBC feel about that? I mean they were going to be sued by Breazeale weren’t they? Because I seem to remember that was one of their excuse for elevating Breazeale to their mandatory shot. Or are they going to go back now and deny/flip the script and now tell us Breazeale/Molina was never a mandatory? When are they going to call or how are they going to call their mandatory if this news is true? Hopefully they would restore their reputation with this decisions and questions.

You can argue with me, but you cant argue the dictionary definition. Think about how weak your argument must be, that your complaint is that I wrote "many" instead of "several." My sincerest apologies. Anybody can look up the registration date of an account. It's not like it's a secret.

Explains why Hearn is saying the nonsense he is saying now

The U.K. Is so small that Joshua is basically the only hero and role model it has. That's why only the US and China finished above us in the medals at the olympics? or Why we have the reigning F1 world champion. The winner of the Fedex cup and world #2 golfer I could go on but this conversation obviously isn't going to be respectful lol. Agree with your original point though if he beats AJ he'll transcend sport in the USA probably.. cya

ooohh you meant Wilder having popularity in the US akin the AJ's in the UK? That i wouldn't know...I cant imagine it myself, not through beating Fury, even twice. I can absolutely see if Wilder beat AJ him eclipsing in the US what AJ's popularity is here... because it stands to reason that all of a sudden the US casual would jump on an undisputed HW champ like any other countries public would for their manThe U.K. Is so small that Joshua is basically the only hero and role model it has.

I forgot that Anthony Joshua's image is like 5th Avenue in the U.S. ooohh you meant Wilder having popularity in the US akin the AJ's in the UK? That i wouldn't know...I cant imagine it myself, not through beating Fury, even twice. I can absolutely see if Wilder beat AJ him eclipsing in the US what AJ's popularity is here... because it stands to reason that all of a sudden the US casual would jump on an undisputed HW champ like any other countries public would for their man

I want what you're smoking. 1. The british fans will be cheering on Fury out of the two.. should wilder win one or both then theyre gong to root for the other brit ( AJ ) to give back national pride and beat wilder. 2. There is absolutely no way in gods green earth, that Wilder becomes more popular than Anthony Joshua on this island. I would bet my ****ing house... that if Wilder beat Fury twice and then faced any other top challenger than AJ, and AJ faced any other challenger than Wilder, that AJ would smoke him on PPV buys in the UK even if he stayed ****ing inactive. I dont see how hard it is for US fans to get... that the vast majority of the UK fanbase is absolutely massively casual and responds to AJ not just through boxing but because of his image, how he is..etc whether its a facade or not. Deontay wilders whole persona and attitude, is absolutely not what the vast majority of UK boxing-buying public want. in fact its bang opposite.I forgot that Anthony Joshua's image is like 5th Avenue in the U.S.

If Wilder defeats Tyson Fury twice; Once in the U.S and once in the U.K. He could become arguably bigger than Anthony Joshua in terms of popularity in Great Britain. I want what you're smoking. 1. The british fans will be cheering on Fury out of the two.. should wilder win one or both then theyre gong to root for the other brit ( AJ ) to give back national pride and beat wilder. 2. There is absolutely no way in gods green earth, that Wilder becomes more popular than Anthony Joshua on this island. I would bet my ****ing house... that if Wilder beat Fury twice and then faced any other top challenger than AJ, and AJ faced any other challenger than Wilder, that AJ would smoke him on PPV buys in the UK even if he stayed ****ing inactive. I dont see how hard it is for US fans to get... that the vast majority of the UK fanbase is absolutely massively casual and responds to AJ not just through boxing but because of his image, how he is..etc whether its a facade or not. Deontay wilders whole persona and attitude, is absolutely not what the vast majority of UK boxing-buying public want. in fact its bang opposite.

If Wilder defeats Tyson Fury twice; Once in the U.S and once in the U.K. He could become arguably bigger than Anthony Joshua in terms of popularity in Great Britain.

That account is three years old and my original account is over ten years old. If you want to argue over your opinion of "many," be my guest. Nothing imaginary about it. If you don't believe I've been on this site for over a decade, bet me. You know proving myself will reveal my identity and I should be compensated for that. It's not even three years old... and it isn't an opinion, here's the definition. 3 years, given the life of this forum, matches none of the below. 1. a large number of. synonyms: numerous, a great/good deal of, a lot of, a large/great number of, great quan****** of, plenty of, countless, innumerable, scores of, crowds of, droves of, an army of, a horde of, a multitude of, a multiplicity of You can argue with me, but you cant argue the dictionary definition. When did i say you haven't been on here for a decade? I said you lied about your original zero account being here for many years which is correct. I didn't say you haven't been here for over a decade at all... you may think I've implied it but that's your opinion and that's wholly subjective. I've only asked why you lied about a specific named accounts age. I don't have to financially compensate you for outing yourself, because i don't give a flying **** who you are.. or the other two tossers you apparently share this account with. You can all remain completely anonymous for all i care. For someone who likes to live purely in the black and white of things, which has always been your posting and debate style, you're trying very hard to figure a way of putting across a different version. You posted something, I took it at its absolute literal meaning and it's turned out to be incorrect and/or untrue, there really isn't anything else to it. What you stated.. was false, untrue and incorrect.

you said your original zero account goes back many years... they are your words. That account is three years old and my original account is over ten years old. If you want to argue over your opinion of "many," be my guest. Dont come at me with what you do with kafkod, by placing imaginary millionaire wagers with people. Nothing imaginary about it. If you don't believe I've been on this site for over a decade, bet me. You know proving myself will reveal my identity and I should be compensated for that.

Because inevitably, someone opens their mouth that shouldn't. Which is what happened here. But when Fury, Wilder, Warren, Finkel, etc have been asked about rematch clauses, they've been coy or said they can't discuss it. Haymon runs a tight ship and prefers to keep things on a need to know basis. There's no reason the public ever needs to know about a rematch clause before a fight takes place. It's not my fault that you don't know how to read. If you don't believe me that my original account is over a decade old, and if you want to know my real identity, make me a wager that is worth my while. My login of my old account still works. I have directly quoted you. If you wish to go and edit your original post, I'll happily go and screen cap that you edited it to further prove what a liar you are. you said your original zero account goes back many years... they are your words. It doesn't at all, and is easily proved by simply visiting that profile. I am calling you a liar because you stated THAT account, the very account you named, goes back many years and it in fact does not. Dont come at me with what you do with kafkod, by placing imaginary millionaire wagers with people.. by the way Is it just you who has loads of money or do the other two who apparently use this account have access to tens of thousands of dollars too ? I quoted you directly.. called you out on your black and white words and have proved that what you stated to another member is word for word.. bull****. I dont need to make a wager to prove its bull**** when your direct quote and the age of the account you stated are in direct contradiction. What are you going to do ? say i edited the quote and you said original and not original zero ? GTFO you mess...

Rematch clauses are nearly always made public in fights of this magnitude. Because inevitably, someone opens their mouth that shouldn't. Which is what happened here. But when Fury, Wilder, Warren, Finkel, etc have been asked about rematch clauses, they've been coy or said they can't discuss it. I can't think of a big fight or super fight in the last 10 years that has featured a clause and it not be made public much earlier and certainly not by the b-sides trainer. Haymon runs a tight ship and prefers to keep things on a need to know basis. There's no reason the public ever needs to know about a rematch clause before a fight takes place. they are your actual words and I proved them to be false..very easily in fact by simply looking at the profile. The only liar here is you. It's not my fault that you don't know how to read. If you don't believe me that my original account is over a decade old, and if you want to know my real identity, make me a wager that is worth my while. My login of my old account still works.

Most "EXPERTS ? lol ) would know know one credible would consider Tyson lineal https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/boxing/729692/Boxing-news-Tyson-Fury-slams-Anthony-Joshua-Eddie-Hearn-Deontay-Wilder-hype-video Fury, 30, put on a boxing masterclass as he easily swept aside Francesco Pianeta in Belfast last month. The pair went the distance but the lineal champion never looked uncomfortable in a dominant display in front of a packed crowd. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/7340164/anthony-joshua-tyson-fury-deontay-wilder-boxing/ The lineal champ said: "Think it's now safe to say AJ and his team are a pack of s***houses and will rob the British boxing fans of Britons biggest fight." https://www.cbssports.com/boxing/news/deontay-wilder-vs-tyson-fury-heavyweight-championship-showdown-set-for-december/ Deontay Wilder will meet lineal heavyweight champion Tyson Fury on Dec. 1. https://www.boxingscene.com/anthony-joshua-asks-tyson-fury-why-i-shthouse--132145 Lineal champion Tyson Fury erupted in the direction of Anthony Joshua, after watching the unified champion's stoppage win over Alexander Povetkin. https://fightnetwork.com/news/6676824:deontay-wilder-vs-tyson-fury-set-for-december-1-on-ppv/ Deontay Wilder will defend his title against lineal champion Tyson Fury in a blockbuster matchup of undefeated heavyweights Saturday, December 1 live on pay-per-view. https://www.sportingnews.com/au/boxing/news/anthony-joshua-deontay-wilder-tyson-fury-joshua-vs-povetin/1iqz7lby3fmiz11u83rkmzrh5l Fury, the lineal heavyweight champion, returned in June after nearly a two-year layoff due to personal issues to defeat Sefer Seferi and Francesco Pianeta in August. https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/live-anthony-joshua-vs-alexander-povetkin-for-ibf-/3531556/ Wilder announced a fight with lineal champion Tyson Fury in the US in early December. Joshua said he wants Wilder in April next year. https://www.ringnews24.com/2018/09/01/lennox-lewis-rates-tyson-fury-vs-deontay-wilder-as-the-superior-fight-to-anthony-joshua-vs-alexander-povetkin/ Boxing’s last great heavyweight champion Lennox ‘The Lion’ Lewis 41-2-1 (32) has voiced his opinion on the upcoming title fights between lineal heavyweight champion Tyson Fury and WBC titleholder Deontay Wilder http://www.sportingnews.com/ca/boxing/news/kubrat-pulev-to-face-hughie-fury-in-ibf-eliminator/aynfrz6mjsjf1ak6ye5pvgfvv Fury, who is the cousin of lineal heavyweight champion Tyson Fury, is as excited as could be for the fight. https://www.******.com/537472-tyson-fury-wins-comeback-bout-against-sefer-seferi-in-farce-but-what-did-we-really-learn/ It’s a fourth-round stoppage victory for Fury, who remains the lineal heavyweight champion dating back to his first fight before the layoff, an upset decision victory over future hall of famer Wladimir Klitschko.

I actually know the answer to this, but I can't say. Furys team have a confidentiality agreement where they can't say anything about the contract until next Monday so I can't tell you guys, sorry. Watch the press conference next Monday, they will say everything then

There's nothing funny about it. Rematch clauses are supposed to be kept secret as to not damage the commercial interest in the first fight. There are many ways to structure a rematch clause. It doesn't necessarily have to be immediate and you can negotiate exceptions. I simply speculated when the Wilder/Fury talks first emerged that it was likely a two fight deal. I answer you, you don't like the answer, and then you just lie and claim I didn't answer you. Pretty pathetic tactic. My original account is over a decade old. I stopped posting from it because it uses my real name and I don't want people to know who I am. Rematch clauses are nearly always made public in fights of this magnitude. I can't think of a big fight or super fight in the last 10 years that has featured a clause and it not be made public much earlier and certainly not by the b-sides trainer. You answered once and it was a lie.. I even replied with your direct quote to the other forum member which was My original zero account goes back many years. they are your actual words and I proved them to be false..very easily in fact by simply looking at the profile. The only liar here is you.

Funny how the mutual rematch clause has now only surfaced from Davison..a somewhat credible source..after AJ's victory. There's nothing funny about it. Rematch clauses are supposed to be kept secret as to not damage the commercial interest in the first fight. There are many ways to structure a rematch clause. It doesn't necessarily have to be immediate and you can negotiate exceptions. I simply speculated when the Wilder/Fury talks first emerged that it was likely a two fight deal. You still haven't addressed why you lied about your account ..so I'll ask you again for a fourth time. I answer you, you don't like the answer, and then you just lie and claim I didn't answer you. Pretty pathetic tactic. Why did you lie about the active age of your account and claim it to be much longer than it really is? My original account is over a decade old. I stopped posting from it because it uses my real name and I don't want people to know who I am.