The hate/bias boxingscene and most press have against Mexican fighers

list is now up to 60 that have canelo winning the fight

It is all about the personalities. Canelo and Mikey behave like divas, so many people will dislike them. Guys like Humberto Soto, Barrera, Morales will always be among my favorites. Hell that cat Jose Ramirez is already becoming one of my current favorites

Canelo Won! You can look at their record when its a Mexican fighter vs a fighter from another country...in this case canelo vs ggg- boxingscene has posted articles of ggg supporters almost everyday since the fight but the only one for canelo...from the wbc president. None pointing out how most of the top fighters/former fighters some now trainers had canelo beating ggg...today they posted a nacho article for ggg but no Mayweather SR. For canelo...here is a list... M Tyson G Foreman JC Chavez M Cotto R Garcia J Arce W Monroe C Traux A Trout C Bundridge A Ward A Khan MA Barrera Mikey G Andy Lee Martin Murray E Spence Sergio Mora B Hopkins J Linares P Quillin T Bellew D Haye F Mayweather SR E Morales D Lemieux J Williams P Smith L Smith J Charlo Fighters of all races and nationalities...aside from all of this, articles on good things ggg did but few if any pointing out canelo's good work. It is obvious what websites like this one try to do and most websites post the same biased garbage from the same "writers" and show no neutrality...and if you're a true fight fan call them out! Some people will remain ignorant their entire lives. Cinnamon promotes warmth, healing, peace, happiness, and wealth$$, Canelo won!

What a stupid post. Very stupid. Mexicans are the more objective fan base. A lot of mexicans were cheering for GGG. How many people from phillipines were supporting Marquez? Mexicans were mad in the first fight of Canelo against GGG. How many people from Argentina were mad in the huge robbery of Martínez against Murray? A lot of mexicans are haters of Canelo, a lot... How many blackamericans were haters of Floyd? Stop saying sh.it. That's what I'm saying. You know the people I'm talking about who are your race make YOU look bad. Every race has a bunch of idiots who make everyone look bad. Imo there's a ton of Mexicans here who ruin the sport for everyone including members of their own race. When I watch a fight they might as well be same color mannequins doing battle. But I feel that some Mexicans just cheer because they're Mexican and these "fans" are just casuals who dont know the sport.

As a minority myself the Mexicans on this site are the worst. They might as have Mexican pride tattooed on their face and wear the Mexican flag everywhere they go that's how obnoxious they are. Then the got the balls to say you hate Mexicans when they're the one talking **** about anyone not mexican. I mean come on, you're only Mexican boxing fans because you are Mexican. And then your shout to the heavens how great your race is and if anyone opinion isnt the same as yours they're racist. I dislike boxers like Mikey Garcia because just like his fans he talks a big ass game and doesnt even deliver the goods. How much does a guy need to name drop? When is he actually gonna fight real champs and not paper champs? The difference between Mikey and someone like Loma is that Loma has fought everyone put in front of him. He doesnt name drop like mikey. The dude is far more humble. I'm not saying hes better, though imo, I believe he is. Im not trying to discredit the guy but the only think he has on Lomachenko is size. Maybe a stiff jab, but that's about it. Linares is bigger than Mikey too and has the same slow ass footwork. But Linares said himself he trained for 2 full fights to fight lomachenko. Has Mikey? But nah. Ya'll always make it about race. Always. Im sitting here trying my best to be objective but ya'll always whining calling people haters because they hurt your feelings. Real talk. Be a fan of the sport and not your race. What a stupid post. Very stupid. Mexicans are the more objective fan base. A lot of mexicans were cheering for GGG. How many people from phillipines were supporting Marquez? Mexicans were mad in the first fight of Canelo against GGG. How many people from Argentina were mad in the huge robbery of Martínez against Murray? A lot of mexicans are haters of Canelo, a lot... How many blackamericans were haters of Floyd? Stop saying sh.it.

Exactly. Most of fans dont know **** about this I don't know about some of these polls because in person its not lopsided but check out a video on You tube its called "Andy Lee ethers ggg fanboys who hate canelo's win". Great description of the biased commentary and the effects it can have on fools or people that have their minds made up before the fight and we all know some is just racial/nationalistic hate.

I've seen plenty pointing to Canelo doing well but the reality is that there's a significantly larger number of people who think GGG won. I don't see a huge bias in general against Mexican boxers or Mexican boxing. They get good press in general. Canelo gets a lot of heat but he did fail multiple tests and didn't act with grace. He's also definitely got more favorable treatment than most fighters so naturally people don't like that type of stuff. The press did say Marquez was robbed in Pacquaio III for example and a lot of idiots then said "well the judges said this", "well Pacquaio landed more shots". Re: this site being biased against Mexicans. It goes a number of ways and it does exist. A lot of posters really don't like Mexican and black fighters but a lot of posters really hate white fighters/European fighters. I think there's more troll threads and posters tearing down active European boxers than anything else and that's just a fact. It's blind ignorance to act like it doesn't happen. A lot of noobs especially Pacquaio one's hate Mexican fighters because Marquez had the audacity to not go down without a fight. It's sad that it's come to that and people have taken things deeper than the sport we are supposed to love and be here to discuss. You can spot them a mile off I said I think GGG won and one idiot poster who's been here years (lizard man) said I'm a Pacquaio fan who was still upset that Marquez KO'd him when here on planet earth Marquez is my all-time favorite fighter and I've followed his career since the 90's and spent thousand$$$ watching him live a ton of times and actually got ****face drunk celebrating that KO and I hate Pacquaio lol that's proof most posters don't even read they just write their BS (kinda like that fight club line about not listening just waiting for your chance to talk). Pacquaio fans paint me as a Mayweather fan because I say Marquez is a great fighter. There's a lot of stupid fans that are caught in a Mayweather-Pacquaio war and some make it racial. Anytime somebody says "my race/my country has the best ___" you know they are a racist and are insecure. Most boxing fans are casual fans and a large number of them are stupid and bigoted. This place maybe more so than most and IMO the board needs a re-vamp. Create a noob section and posters have to be approved by others with good reputation and can't start a thread until x amount of green k or approved posts. As a minority myself the Mexicans on this site are the worst. They might as have Mexican pride tattooed on their face and wear the Mexican flag everywhere they go that's how obnoxious they are. Then the got the balls to say you hate Mexicans when they're the one talking **** about anyone not mexican. I mean come on, you're only Mexican boxing fans because you are Mexican. And then your shout to the heavens how great your race is and if anyone opinion isnt the same as yours they're racist. I dislike boxers like Mikey Garcia because just like his fans he talks a big ass game and doesnt even deliver the goods. How much does a guy need to name drop? When is he actually gonna fight real champs and not paper champs? The difference between Mikey and someone like Loma is that Loma has fought everyone put in front of him. He doesnt name drop like mikey. The dude is far more humble. I'm not saying hes better, though imo, I believe he is. Im not trying to discredit the guy but the only think he has on Lomachenko is size. Maybe a stiff jab, but that's about it. Linares is bigger than Mikey too and has the same slow ass footwork. But Linares said himself he trained for 2 full fights to fight lomachenko. Has Mikey? But nah. Ya'll always make it about race. Always. Im sitting here trying my best to be objective but ya'll always whining calling people haters because they hurt your feelings. Real talk. Be a fan of the sport and not your race.

The obvious answer, is obvious: Americans hate Mexicans.

Most boxers and trainers had Canelo winning. But the great mayority of people had GGG winning. Hate to say it but one group knows more about boxing. The rest DKSAB Exactly. Most of fans dont know **** about this

mexicans are basically being holocausted by the media, we can't stand idly by and let this happen

had it 6-2 after 8 rounds for canelo ggg won every round but the 12th on my scorecard looks to me like ggg was getting his offense offset by the canelo body work and he would have to reset with the jab(thats why he was jabbin so much) bc he likes to have room to extend his punch canelo didnt give him that option. that alone shows ring generalship for canelo and the man who had over 300 am fights got the pace dictated to by the smaller fighter ggg looked his age in this fight. but if they gave the fight to ggg i wouldnt be mad neither fighter showed TRU separation in this fight.

Most boxers and trainers had Canelo winning. But the great mayority of people had GGG winning. Hate to say it but one group knows more about boxing. The rest DKSAB

Saul Canelo Alvarez in my judgement lost the fight but was awarded the decision by the three official judges scorecards. Just live with it and move on. At least I have. In addition, it was far from a robbery as there were many close rounds that were too hard to score. Canelo made it a very close fight, however by adding several wrinkles to his game. He threw more combination punches in bunches, he went to the body more and stayed off the ropes by forcing Golovkin to fight off the back foot, as he was the aggressive fighter throughout the fight coming forward. Even though he was consistently getting caught flush in the face by Golovkin's jab earlier in the fight.

Saul Canelo Alvarez in my judgement lost the fight but was awarded the decision by the three judges scorecards. Just live with it and move on. At least I have. In addition, it was far from a robbery as there were many close rounds that were too hard to score. Canelo made it a very close fight, however by adding several wrinkles to his game. He threw more combination punches in bunches, he went to the body more and stayed off the ropes by forcing Golovkin to fight off the back foot, as he was the aggressive fighter throughout the fight coming forward. Even while he was consistently getting caught flush in the face by Golovkin's jab.

Your stating your opinions and thats ok but not everyone agrees...for example I think canelo beat Lara clearly...you think Estrada vs Rungvisai was fair but chocolatito thinks Estrada won clearly ...and thats the point this website would post your opinions because it fits the nerrative. And then if it went against your bias spin masters like you would say "Oh well Chocolatito just jealous of Rungvisai because he lost and he beat Estrada so it makes him look better". I had the fight 115-113 Estrada live and then watched on TV I had it 114-114 but I totally understood 115-113 Rungvisai. That was a razor thin either way type fight and given the general consensus not just my view Rungvisai deserved to defend his belt either via draw or narrow win.

They have no use for Mexican fighters now that fighters who closely resemble them have become more prominent in America. LMFAO this comment is ****ing hilarious american fighters are too timid to get in a toe to toe fight buddy they rely too much and their ****ty am background and poit shot like *******

The only opinion for canelo there is Ward even though there are over 35 from fighters and trainers for canelo. But check this out...all truly even fights all decisions against Mexicans Estrada vs Rungvisai Estrada vs chocolatito Cuadras vs chocolatito Santa Cruz vs Frampton 1 Just 4 examples, in 2 Mexican champs in 2 Mexican challengers All writers/articles I saw on here had nothing but praises for the winners of those decisions no clamoring rematch no crying about or disagreeing with the decisions...coincidence or pattern?...you have to go on YouTube to see neutrality. But this must be called out by true fans of boxing. Exactly. Thats the truth.

He lost the fight but was awarded the decision. Just live with it and move on. At least I have. He made it a very close fight by adding several wrinkles to his game. Like throwing more combination punches in bunches, going to the body more and staying off the ropes by forcing Golovkin to fight off the back foot as he was the aggressive fighter throughout the fight coming forward; Even though he was consistently getting caught flush in the face by Golovkin's jab.

All those except Estrada-Rungvisai were clear-cut correct decisions. Close fights with clear winners with no real way you could score to the loser. I'm a big Estrada fan and I was at those fights (apart from LSC-Frampton I) and saw them on TV too but he lost clear to Chocolatito as did Cuadras. I felt Rungvisai was a draw but can see 7-5 either way though the general feel was it was a decent enough verdict. Not to mention all of these fights combined weren't of the magnitude of GGG/Canelo II. Not too many people kicked up a fuss over Canelo-Lara which Lara won six rounds clearly and a lot of fans feel it should have gone Lara's way. On the flip side the type of fans that are adamant Canelo won clearly also scored those fights for the Mexican and claimed robbery. Your stating your opinions and thats ok but not everyone agrees...for example I think canelo beat Lara clearly...you think Estrada vs Rungvisai was fair but chocolatito thinks Estrada won clearly ...and thats the point this website would post your opinions because it fits the nerrative.

The only opinion for canelo there is Ward even though there are over 35 from fighters and trainers for canelo. But check this out...all truly even fights all decisions against Mexicans Estrada vs Rungvisai Estrada vs chocolatito Cuadras vs chocolatito Santa Cruz vs Frampton 1 Just 4 examples, in 2 Mexican champs in 2 Mexican challengers All writers/articles I saw on here had nothing but praises for the winners of those decisions no clamoring rematch no crying about or disagreeing with the decisions...coincidence or pattern?...you have to go on YouTube to see neutrality. But this must be called out by true fans of boxing. All those except Estrada-Rungvisai were clear-cut correct decisions. Close fights with clear winners with no real way you could score to the loser. I'm a big Estrada fan and I was at those fights (apart from LSC-Frampton I) and saw them on TV too but he lost clear to Chocolatito as did Cuadras. I felt Rungvisai was a draw but can see 7-5 either way though the general feel was it was a decent enough verdict. Not to mention all of these fights combined weren't of the magnitude of GGG/Canelo II. Not too many people kicked up a fuss over Canelo-Lara which Lara won six rounds clearly and a lot of fans feel it should have gone Lara's way. On the flip side the type of fans that are adamant Canelo won clearly also scored those fights for the Mexican and claimed robbery.