This guy is a bias idiot and a motormouth. He can't say 5 words in a row without saying alright or ok or right. Hearn is a very rich successful promoter. This guy is a dummy who loves a captive audience so he can build up boxers he likes like Wilder and Jermall while trashing champions like GGG and AJ who he hates. The guy is bias and unfair to the point of absurdity. Everything he has to say can be thrown out as totally worthless. He is just an uneducated stupid fanboy with his own boxing site.
Watch this video too:
Don't be a bitch about it.
This guy is a bias idiot and a motormouth. He can't say 5 words in a row without saying alright or ok or right. Hearn is a very rich successful promoter. This guy is a dummy who loves a captive audience so he can build up boxers he likes like Wilder and Jermall while trashing champions like GGG and AJ who he hates. The guy is bias and unfair to the point of absurdity. Everything he has to say can be thrown out as totally worthless. He is just an uneducated stupid fanboy with his own boxing site.
Why should Hearn give a **** about Wilder vs Fury. I guarentee that Joshua vs Povetkin will generate more money.
but it won't be in the spotlight, and Hearn can't say that Wilder only fights nobodies when AJ has been saying Fury's name the whole time Tyson was on hiatus.
Maybe I should share a post from DumpkinsPlus5, rather than someone who has the WBC champion's ear and 57k subs along with millions of views.
Should I do that?
Wow, you sure told me...because being personal friends with Wilder doesn't indicate any bias. Neither does refusing to say anything negative about Wilder in this situation across 100 videos.
My goodness! 57k subs with millions of views!?!?!?!? Same thing could be said about Floydhype oh excuse me Fighthype and we all know they do honest work without a hint of bias.
For the record, I didn't disagree with you. There are reasons Hearns wouldn't want the fight to happen. But if you want to make believers out of people with an OBJECTIVE mind, you may not want to use "evidence" that comes from someone who hasn't shown an iota of objectivity when it comes Wilder and Joshua/Hearns
While this may be the case, posting a video made by a bonafide Wilder fanboy may not be the best supporting evidence.
Maybe I should share a post from DumpkinsPlus5, rather than someone who has the WBC champion's ear and 57k subs along with millions of views.
Should I do that?
Of course he is. He knows if Wilder beats Fury on ppv and becomes lineal champion, he'll get a lot more leverage. Then the fact that the fight was made so easily exposes Hearn.