Spence Crawford overrated

Retard alert. Who's better than Spence or Crawford at welterweight? A loaded division. Who you got? Thurman?? Please. Please say Thurman. Jesus.

Spence and Crawford are raw talent that are not tested yet. They can be a lemon are a true diamond in a rough. Heck, I'm in the minority here, since boxing is a young man's sport. But I can see Pac's Vet wisdom in the ring putting this 2 in a tough fight with him and winning it. Which is another topic I was thinking of making. What if These 2 young hungry lions all of sudden loses to Pacquiao? Will their career decline? Or it won't affect them?

Ive been saying this for a while now, not really impressed by crawford or spence. spences best wins are algerie and brook. and crawford don't even get me started on that crackhead looking mofo,lmfao Yeah its strange, yet the same ones praise spence and crawford **** on every pacquiao fight, spence and crawford fans got that black privledged entitlement.

Unless you have a magicball and can see into the future you can't call someone overrated until they're exposed. This talk of overrated fighters is getting stale and boring tbh.

Brook giving Spence a'll that he can handle. Lol. Thanks for the laugh op.

Garcia always looks marked up after fights he bruises easy. He beat Peterson clear. Peterson had a bad gameplay that he should of implemented sooner and I was rooting for Garcia. According to who? Thurman was in most peoples opinion. Brook has one decent win in his career. Your right he beat a guy who Thurman barley beat never wanted a rematch. While Thurman did surpass him he was still one of the top.

Who have these two beat that are actually good? Crawford = undersized guys and bums. Spence = Damaged goods Brook who was giving him all he could handle before the stoppage.No they are not overrated. You are just a very poor judge of boxing talent. Keep on believing Thurman, Garcia and Porter are better than Spence and Crawford but they are no where near as good as these two aces. That's why Spence and Crawford are on PFP best lists and your guys are not.

Never said Peterson gave Spence all he could handle but he did Garcia... did you see his face? Garcia always looks marked up after fights he bruises easy. He beat Peterson clear. Also Brook was still number 1 in his division and only fought Spence cause he had too. According to who? Thurman was in most peoples opinion. Brook has one decent win in his career.

Ive been saying this for a while now, not really impressed by crawford or spence. spences best wins are algerie and brook. and crawford don't even get me started on that crackhead looking mofo,lmfao

Peterson was never anything but B minus, Garcia beat a fresher Peterson clearly. Stop this nonsense about Peterson giving Spence all he could handle, Peterson just tried to spoil the fight by dancing around like a clown and did nothing meaningful. Brook was damaged goods, not only that he was coming down in weight which he undoubtedly struggled to make. Both these guys haven't proven ****. Never said Peterson gave Spence all he could handle but he did Garcia... did you see his face? Also Brook was still number 1 in his division and only fought Spence cause he had too. Like I said they have an aura around them. How can you prove yourself if the good guys don’t want too fight you???

Brooke had gotten dropped, an eye socket broke and basically beaten into submission. As the fight ended, Spence looked unmarked. So what is your definition of "giving him all he could handle?". Spence was never in danger of going down, never hurt, and contrary to the commentators, every judge had it in Spence's favor at the time Brook quit. So no, this wasn't a close fight and Brook knew it wasn't close that's why he quit instead of taking another 4 minutes or so of abuse. Brook was getting the best of him the 1st 3 rounds but that was about it. He was countering everything Spence threw and making him miss. After that...well, you know what happened

They are both really good and in Crawford’s case will prove to be great. I don’t know why people are so eager to label fighters overrated or garbage all the time. These guys are fighting the guys that will fight them and looking good. I agree there’s a double standard out there that’s racially motivated (Spence resume isn’t as good as Loma, GGG or Usyk but it’s ignored when they all got **** for their work) but I think Crawford and Spence in general are rated accordingly - Crawford as a top 2 or 3 pound for pound guy and Spence a top 10 guy searching for a big fight. But yeah it’s not fair that a standard is “Loma gotta beat Crawford to prove himself” but Spence doesn’t have to and Mikey is accepted as the litmus test. That’s unfair.

Who have these two beat that are actually good? Crawford = undersized guys and bums. Spence = Damaged goods Brook who was giving him all he could handle before the stoppage. Im a big fan of both Spence and crawford, but the bias and double standards are weird, I never criticize them but the same ones who give these guys praise are the same ones on youtube who diss Pac, loma, ggg opponents and skills. They are Black so they cannot be overrated, its funny how people especially whites think also subconsciously Black equals good, when Floyd fought Pacquiao they said he schooled him when the fight was a stalemate but because they dont know **** and they are conditioned to think blacks are athletic and good and you cannot question them or you are a racist they just believe it its like when you in school and everyone picsk the black guy first even if he isn't athletic because their mind is preconditioned. the only ones you see get called overhyped, bums or jokes with no skill are non black boxers, if you call a black boxer hype or untested or flawed you are automatically racist its pre conditioning years and years of saying black are victim this why boxing has become a joke. Just look how they give all these guys like Spence and Crawford a pass, Pac fights Horn he a scrub no name school teacher, Crawford fights him its an amazing win~ wow did you see Crawford skills? Spence fights Algieiri wow he stopped him Pac couldn't stop him, yes Pac could have but he whooped Algieri worse, the ref just decides in Pac fights not to stop them so they go to the decision, Algeri got dropped badly and the fight could have been waved off Spence fights Ocampo no criticism from the black fans. If Pac fights Bradley, Vargas, Lucas, Algieri, Horn everyone says cherry picked fight bull**** also why do they never say a black fighter fights a tailor made opponent only when a non black does.

Before he was hurt it was pretty much 50/50. Brook was always overrated anyways. competitive how? As in Brook was doing the same thing to Spence that was being done to him? Ok, I'll ask you this, from rounds 1-10, which fighter would you NOT have want to be in his place?

Here we go again

Brooke had gotten dropped, an eye socket broke and basically beaten into submission. As the fight ended, Spence looked unmarked. So what is your definition of "giving him all he could handle?". Spence was never in danger of going down, never hurt, and contrary to the commentators, every judge had it in Spence's favor at the time Brook quit. So no, this wasn't a close fight and Brook knew it wasn't close that's why he quit instead of taking another 4 minutes or so of abuse. Before he was hurt it was pretty much 50/50. Brook was always overrated anyways.

Who have these two beat that are actually good? Crawford = undersized guys and bums. Spence = Damaged goods Brook who was giving him all he could handle before the stoppage. Holy hell. Brook is a good fighter. It was competitive. So what?

Overrated? No untested? You can argue that in Spence’s case I give him credit for Brook and Peterson who gave Garcia all he could handle. Peterson was never anything but B minus, Garcia beat a fresher Peterson clearly. Stop this nonsense about Peterson giving Spence all he could handle, Peterson just tried to spoil the fight by dancing around like a clown and did nothing meaningful. Brook was damaged goods, not only that he was coming down in weight which he undoubtedly struggled to make. Both these guys haven't proven ****.

Brooke had gotten dropped, an eye socket broke and basically beaten into submission. As the fight ended, Spence looked unmarked. So what is your definition of "giving him all he could handle?". Spence was never in danger of going down, never hurt, and contrary to the commentators, every judge had it in Spence's favor at the time Brook quit. So no, this wasn't a close fight and Brook knew it wasn't close that's why he quit instead of taking another 4 minutes or so of abuse.

Overrated? No untested? You can argue that in Spence’s case I give him credit for Brook and Peterson who gave Garcia all he could handle. They both have a Aura around them. Spence because no one wants too fight him including Brook who cashed out vs GGG. Crawford because he easily gets his opponents out of there.