I always thought so but I think most top guys are.
If he is, whatever he's taking he needs to get his money back because it sure as hell isn't showing in his punching power
Floyd may or may not have been. Refusing the clean testing program is a good indicator.
But Kell also obviously looks like a roider.
Floyd was offered up VADA but stuck with USADA, and did not sign up to any round year testing, even though many boxers were doing so.
How many welters are on the sign up sheet?
I guess Mayweather was juiced to the eyeballs as well, as he refused VADA testing.
Floyd may or may not have been. Refusing the clean testing program is a good indicator.
But Kell also obviously looks like a roider.
that ***** is the biggest racist and biggest troll on here. He trolls
on almost every white fighters articles every time.
He hates all UK fighters
I'm guessing hes some pakistani/ south asian running a corner shop in USA vexed that his race are hopelessly embarrassingly awful at boxing so he latches onto blackboys - the second best race at boxing after whites.
In fact I bet hes not even american. I bet he loves in the UK.. these pakky losers in the uk are all anti british.
LOL. Racist white losers throwing hissy fits. Pathetic but funny.
if you go by cons lip flapping, youd think hes been going around laying waste to all the top guys.
1x - 28 fights
best wins - swift, porter, ghost. nothing too epic
pac is pac
garcia - relatively new to the scene. made con dance all over the ring.
con refuses to fight brook
spence and bud are newer than danny so their resumes are a work in progress.
personally, i dont think con will beat another top guy again.
And yet you go on avoiding the question.
Don't bother wasting either of our time by responding.
con hasnt done anything worth mentioning in YEARS but talk about how great he is and leading brook on.
that list proves it.
You're thick aren't you? Shame.
I never said Khan was great nor did I say he'd done anything recently. I just said he has a better overall resume than all Americans fighting today. Which is true. The only one who could challenge that is Crawford.
Understand now? If not, who has a better overall resume?
the rest of the world is in no position to laugh at us in the sense that we're the least laughable of any country.
again, you f#ggots won't offer up any better country and explain your standards. In reality you know that what i am saying is true.
You're the least laughable of any country??
I'll leave this because you're a typical American in the sense that you're completely deluded. Your president alone gives the world a laugh, and that's before we go into the nutty public that has the world laughing and scratching their head.
Go and do some research for quality of life in each country if you want to know the pros and cons of each country. I'm not your skivvy.
you rambled off a list of mediocrity.
you swear lamont fought con with a different energy level than he has vs any other opponent.
no matter what name i give you, your love for con will not let you see the truth.
2011, doe
seems as if it were just yesterday
I'm saying what i'm saying because I love Khan and not because i'm talking truth?
Haha.
The problem with this site is it is full of weirdo's.
Haha, Then you're a prat. No wonder the world laughs at you idiots. Seriously, stop being complete knob heads.
the rest of the world is in no position to laugh at us in the sense that we're the least laughable of any country.
again, you f#ggots won't offer up any better country and explain your standards. In reality you know that what i am saying is true.
Pretty sure he has 2 losses on his record, but why let facts get in the way of things.
Besides, look at the nature of his losses. Going up 2 weights to fight the best MW of his era, who just happens to be a brutal puncher. Then he dropped 2 divisions to a division he already could barely make, after coming off a beating and eye surgery to fight Spence, rather than duck him and vacate.
If more boxers had the balls that Brook does, the sport would be far far better.
I'll take a fighter that takes on a challenge and loses some fights than a fighter that refuses to step up when a challenge is put in front of them.
It’s a shame that there’s people on here that will disagree with this and they, along with their way of thinking, are only serving a detriment to the way a lot of stuff gets dealt with in modern boxing. Usually casuals that think a loss makes you worthless...does nothing but encourage big fighters/Promotions to tread lightly.
Didnt bother to read it all but the same happened to Errol Spence, he was removed from the rankings in April because he refused to sign up for the Clean Boxing Program.
Spence is probably the hardest juiicer in the sport right now.
Good point but I still think he should enroll so he can be ranked. That to me makes him suspect as heck but you are totally biased to ukfighters
No I'm just educated on them.
Also, he did sign up.
He doesn’t supposedly get tested, he gets tested year round. Once you understand that then we can take it further.
Brook isn’t fighting for the wbc titles I suppose so he doesn’t need to enroll.
Good point but I still think he should enroll so he can be ranked. That to me makes him suspect as heck but you are totally biased to ukfighters
I've seen people defend such decisions on here in the past with other fighters.
i.e : He's not going down the WBC route, so why pay the fees.
I'm glad no ones said that here though, and it's good to see Brook signed up now. In an ideal world all the fighters would.
so, since con has been CLEARLY dominating ww since 2011, he cant even accidentally bump into a title :lol1: ?!?!?!?
As I say, you can't even give me a good answer.
but of all those guys Maidana is really the only great win and even then he scraped by.
And even the Maidana win really is bob bob.
Oh they're not great wins, they're just good wins. All of them were in the top ten when Khan beat them. The other list is just the decent wins.