Wilder Now Saying He Will Only Ever Accept 50/50 Split - Pricing Himself Out Forever?

Both Parker and Wilder wanted 50% , the difference one team WANTED the other DEMANDED . No there's no difference. Both were publicly posturing and quickly changed their tunes to 60/40 when actual talks started. I'm not going to argue about your personal opinion of a fighter. The general consensus was that Parker was a safer fight than Wilder. Hearn isn't an idiot. He has the biggest cash cow. You don't rush to the most dangerous fight. To suggest Parker was the most dangerous fight is to suggest that Hearn is incompetent and doesn't know what he's doing. Nothing could be further from the truth. Wilder was getting 12.5 and 4 belts Can't take you seriously when you say AJ has 4 belts. IBO is not a world title. Yes, it's literally a belt, but Wilder likely has more than 4 belts in his closet. If it's not a world title belt, who cares? In the end it was 15 Million where Parker got 6 /7 Million but he got a worse deal ?? What a F'ing idiot you truly are . lol Let's say you're right and Parker only got 6 million. He got a one third split, so that would mean AJ was only paid 12 million. If AJ was only paid 12 million, why did he turn down 50 million? Your position doesn't make any sense.

Boxrec didn't have Parker in the top 5 due to his weak resume. Klitschko, by your own admission was removed from many top ratings after taking 18 months off after a loss. Thank you for your opinion. Boxrec said otherwise. If nobody thought he was anything special, why did all of the world's leading experts have him ranked #2 or #3 in the world? Boxrec :lol1: Man you're just a complete clown. You yourself just said "I don't use Ring, I use TBRB" - Which is fine, but just admit that you're a big fat fuking liar and we can all move on. I called you out on your c0ck sucking agenda, and now you're starting to talk about Boxrec. Regarding Stiverne - Because he won a belt. Otherwise, please explain how someone can beat Arreola and rightfully be number two? :lol1: GTFO midget

You literally said he hadn't fought any top 4 opponents Boxrec didn't have Parker in the top 5 due to his weak resume. Klitschko, by your own admission was removed from many top ratings after taking 18 months off after a loss. Parker's resume craps on both Stiverne and Ortiz's Thank you for your opinion. Boxrec said otherwise. Let's not mention bum ass Stiverne who nobody ever thought was anything special. If nobody thought he was anything special, why did all of the world's leading experts have him ranked #2 or #3 in the world?

Maybe you don't know what words mean? I never said AJ hadn't fought an opponent that was highly ranked by somebody. I said he never fought a consensus top ranked guy. Which he hasn't. Parker's resume was extremely weak, reflect by the fact that Boxrec didn't even have him in the top 5. As for Klitschko, if you don't fight for a really really really long time, you get removed from most respected ranking systems. So again, he wasn't a consensus top ranked guy either. You consistently argue against things nobody said while ignoring things that are actually said. Classic troll strategy. You just continue to lie again and again: Wilder has two top 4 wins on his resume. AJ has zero. You literally said he hadn't fought any top 4 opponents :lol1: And you speak about consensus top opponents now, yet Wilder's win over Stiverne was against a guy who was barely a top 10 fighter if at all before being lucky to fight for a vacant WBC belt vs Chris Arreola. Absolutely laughable. As for resumes, Parker's resume craps on both Stiverne and Ortiz's, those are irrefutable facts. Those guys' combined best win is a UD against Chris Arreola and Bryant Jennings :lol1: And of course we don't even have to talk about Klitschko . But since we are, yes Klitschko didn't fight for long time - through no fault of his own. he was scheduled to fight in July 2016 vs Fury, but of course that didn't happen. He was the CONSENSUS #1 ahead of Wilder and Ortiz, which is proven by him being reinstated as #2 by everyone incl TBRB after the fight, and of course also by the fact that he was #1 all the way up until a month before. Let's not mention bum ass Stiverne who nobody ever thought was anything special. You continue to lie and twist everything to suit your pathetic c0ck sucking agenda. We use rankings when it suits you, but when it doesn't suit you it's the people's opinion that matter. Try again little boy.

Parker ranked #3 :lol1: http://www.tbrb.org/2018/03/14/13-march-2018/ You continue to lie. Maybe you don't know what words mean? I never said AJ hadn't fought an opponent that was highly ranked by somebody. I said he never fought a consensus top ranked guy. Which he hasn't. Parker's resume was extremely weak, reflect by the fact that Boxrec didn't even have him in the top 5. As for Klitschko, if you don't fight for a really really really long time, you get removed from most respected ranking systems. So again, he wasn't a consensus top ranked guy either. You consistently argue against things nobody said while ignoring things that are actually said. Classic troll strategy.

You're the one that brought up Ring ratings, not me. I don't recognize Ring ratings because Ring is owned by HBO's lead promoter and was exposed by Ring employees for corrupting the ratings. Just because I caught you lying about Stiverne's rating doesn't mean Ring is what I go by. I simply proved that not only do you go by corrupt ratings, but you lie about them as well. Parker ranked #3 :lol1: http://www.tbrb.org/2018/03/14/13-march-2018/ You continue to lie. Yeah of course because it suits your pathetic agenda :lol1: Even trying to half insinuate that Wilder's resume is anywhere near Joshua's just show how unbelievably dumb you are. And remember even in March 2017, Klitschko was ranked #1 by TBRB - Just for a ridiculous rule to leave him totally out of the rankings. And of course he was installed as #2 (ahead of Wilder) straight after the fight.

So now you dont recognise ring ratings ? lol What a clown you are ! Ring Magazine is now owned by Oscar De La Hoya, HBO's lead promoter. Since buying the magazine, he's been caught interfering in rankings and championships numerous times, resulting in a large portion of the ratings advisory board quitting in disgust to start TBRB instead. The championship rules have been changed to no longer recognize lineage, so that mandatories can be selectively enforced to strip Showtime fighters, while the same rules aren't applied to HBO fighters. Seems like if there's a clown, it'd be whoever is dumb enough to still respect Ring Magazine.

Nope you're lying . Wilder DEMANDED 50% or no fight before the Parker fight ,that was his starting point It was also Parker's starting point. Didn't stop the fight from happening. Everybody starts high and comes down. So Parker is sitting there asking 50/50, Wilder is sitting there asking 50/50, and you say Hearn going after Parker had nothing to do with every expert on the planet considering Parker the safer fight?!? GTFOH Now, Wilder agrees to a WORSE deal than Parker, and Hearn still ducks him to go after Povetkin instead? And you think that had nothing to do with every expert on the planet considering Povetkin the safer fight?!?

Why are you? :lol1: http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_2017 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_2016 Ring Magazine had Klitschko #1 and Parker #3 You constantly lie. It's embarrassing. You're the one that brought up Ring ratings, not me. I don't recognize Ring ratings because Ring is owned by HBO's lead promoter and was exposed by Ring employees for corrupting the ratings. Just because I caught you lying about Stiverne's rating doesn't mean Ring is what I go by. I simply proved that not only do you go by corrupt ratings, but you lie about them as well.

"So why was AJ so eager to fight Parker but so reluctant to fight Wilder? " Because Wilder was asking for 50% just like the vlown is back to doing now ! :dunce: You're lying. Wilder offered 60/40 in the UK and Hearn said no, flat fee only. Hearn said that figuring there was no way Wilder would accept. Wilder accepted anyway. With his bluff called, Hearn simply refused to do the fight until next year.

You're blatantly lying. Ring had Stiverne #2, not #6. http://web.archive.org/web/20141219101112/http://******.craveonline.com:80/ratings/heavyweight Why are you lying about easily verifiable fact? Why are you? :lol1: http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_2017 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_2016 Ring Magazine had Klitschko #1 and Parker #3 You constantly lie. It's embarrassing.

Had Hearn put in the contract that the fight would be next, Wilder would have signed. That's the only actual deal breaker here. That means that hearn had been doing the rounds in the media for months talking about wembley and maybe cardiff in october or november building it up, hes sent contracts, waiting for finkle, no response, comments answered, waiting he says, 7 or whatever extensions for mandatory, cant wait any more, fight with povetkin. All that and you are saying he sent a contract with no date deliberately to then say HAH we have u now, u signed but the fight is not NOW ha ha, its whenever i say it is!!!! im eddie slick hearn, that why i can do this. Thats a major risk policy wise, u must be either cracked in the head or evil. That could backfire badly on him. Its a very odd tactic.

Maybe Joshua overpaid Parker? Joshua had 2 belts fighting Parker, he now has 3 going into a fight with Wilder. Although I disagree with your opinion I have no problem as long as you apply it fairly. If the GGG/Canelo winner offers Billy Joe Saunders 5x times his highest purse and he turns it down because there is a 1 way rematch clause I expect to see you call out GGG/Canelo for ducking BJS. AJ vs. Wilder is a much much bigger fight than AJ vs. Parker because Wilder is a bigger star than Parker, Wilder has the most valuable belt (Parker had the least valuable belt), and Wilder brings the US market, which is much bigger than the New Zealand market. So why was AJ so eager to fight Parker but so reluctant to fight Wilder? Because Parker was a safe fight and Wilder is a dangerous fight. Plain and simple. Doesn't mean Wilder definitely wins. I view it as a 50/50 fight if it took place in a neutral location. But it does mean from a business perspective that you do everything possible to get Parker in the ring, while you do everything possible to delay Wilder. Hearn is just being a smart business man. This fight fell apart over one thing. And it had nothing to do with a rematch as Finkel already said they'd agreed to AJ's rematch demands. This fight fell apart because Hearn didn't want to do it next. He wanted to do it after Povetkin. Had Hearn put in the contract that the fight would be next, Wilder would have signed. That's the only actual deal breaker here.

Maybe Joshua overpaid Parker? Joshua had 2 belts fighting Parker, he now has 3 going into a fight with Wilder. Although I disagree with your opinion I have no problem as long as you apply it fairly. If the GGG/Canelo winner offers Billy Joe Saunders 5x times his highest purse and he turns it down because there is a 1 way rematch clause I expect to see you call out GGG/Canelo for ducking BJS. Hearn has claimed he did overpay Parker to get the fight done. Oh, and he won't defend either Golovkin or Canelo because they are not Haymon fighters. He's paid to defend them only.

If you won't answer my question, I won't answer yours. You won't answer because you don't have an adequate answer. No B side earned more than 15 mill. And no B side got a rematch clause or even so much as asked for one... because that would be *****ing stupid. Keep defending the bum basher while Joshua takes on the important fights in the division. Keep defending Wilder making peanuts while Joshua makes serious bank.

I can't answer because your premise is false. Wilder is a MUCH stronger B-side than Parker was and Parker was given 33%. Why can't you answer which kid was your favorite of all of the kids that you molested? Maybe Joshua overpaid Parker? Joshua had 2 belts fighting Parker, he now has 3 going into a fight with Wilder. Although I disagree with your opinion I have no problem as long as you apply it fairly. If the GGG/Canelo winner offers Billy Joe Saunders 5x times his highest purse and he turns it down because there is a 1 way rematch clause I expect to see you call out GGG/Canelo for ducking BJS.

Is that all you've got? Are you finding it difficult defending all the bull***** moves Wilder is making? Sad case. If you won't answer my question, I won't answer yours.

Why are you refusing to answer my question? After you answer my question, I will answer yours. Of all of the children you've violently assaulted and molested, which one was the most sexually satisfying? Is that all you've got? Are you finding it difficult defending all the bull***** moves Wilder is making? Sad case.

Parker never got over 15 mill Wilder is being offered. Parker also didn't want a ridiculous rematch clause the way Deontay does. Why are you refusing to answer my question? After you answer my question, I will answer yours. Of all of the children you've violently assaulted and molested, which one was the most sexually satisfying?

I can't answer because your premise is false. Wilder is a MUCH stronger B-side than Parker was and Parker was given 33%. Why can't you answer which kid was your favorite of all of the kids that you molested? Parker never got over 15 mill Wilder is being offered. Parker also didn't want a ridiculous rematch clause the way Deontay does.