Rate these Middleweight resumes from Best to Worst?

Taylor with GGG a close second. I give Golovkin credit for a win over Canelo.

I'd argue that Geale is Golovkin's 2nd best win. Even though Lemy would beat Geale because of style matchup. Why list Spinks for Taylor but not Canelo for Golovkin? Cory Spinks was the RING magazine, unified (IBF, WBA and WBC) Welterweight champion for a period, and a Super Welterweight champion. Saul Alvarez's time at the lower weights consists of a lot of cherry-picking and shady scoring.

I'd argue that Geale is Golovkin's 2nd best win. Even though Lemy would beat Geale because of style matchup. Why list Spinks for Taylor but not Canelo for Golovkin?

Cotto, not even close given that Martinez was fighting off a long lay off and had only one leg. The Canelo, though I don't believe Khan is a MW threat to anyone, even at 155.

Personally, I'd say: 1.) Jermain Taylor 2.) Sergio Martinez 3.) Gennady Golovkin 4.) Kelly Pavlik 5.) Miguel Cotto 6.) Saul AlvarezCotto and Canelo were the two worst champs and never defended at the proper 160 pounds but I rank Canelo better than Cotto because he didn't take a year vacation while champion and he beat Cotto easily in my opinion.Canelo defending against Khan when GGG was trying to fight him was a bad show.

we are pretending canelo drew with ggg still or did that joke become reality?

Yea I would say Sergio had by far the most impressive performances. If we're going solely off names, I'd say Taylor's two wins over B-Hop hold the most value. Pavlik since he has Taylor x2. Taylor with the 2 B-hop wins but that's it. Soliman was 40 & hobbled. GGG without counting Alvarez a win really hurts him here. Sergio is the only one on the list with 2 names that weren't really MW's, Williams & Dzinziruk. Are we really rating Chavez & Barker highly? Saul Miguel.

Yea I would say Sergio had by far the most impressive performances. If we're going solely off names, I'd say Taylor's two wins over B-Hop hold the most value. Yeah definitely, and thats why i dont know which resume is better lol

GGG BEST Martinez 2nd Pavlic 3rd Taylor 4th Canelo 5th Cotto 6th. Cotto and Canelo were terrible pretend middleweight champs who never once defended the middleweight title at the full 160 pounds. If not for crooked judging GGG would have a win over Canelo as well. You think GGG has better wins than B-Hop x2?

Rate the following fighters from Best to Worst, based off their top 5 wins: Jermain Taylor Bernard Hopkins I Bernard Hopkins II Cory Spinks William Joppy Sam Soliman Kelly Pavlik Jermain Taylor I Jermain Taylor II Edison Miranda Marco Antonio Rubio Gary Lockett Sergio Martinez Kelly Pavlik Paul Williams Serhiy Dzinziruk Darren Barker Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. Miguel Cotto Sergio Martinez Daniel Geale N/A N/A N/A Saul Alvarez Miguel Cotto Amir Khan N/A N/A N/A Gennady Golovkin Daniel Jacobs David Lemieux Kell Brook Martin Murray Daniel GealeGGG BEST Martinez 2nd Pavlic 3rd Taylor 4th Canelo 5th Cotto 6th. Cotto and Canelo were terrible pretend middleweight champs who never once defended the middleweight title at the full 160 pounds. If not for crooked judging GGG would have a win over Canelo as well.

Canelo and Cotto's resumes are the worst of any lineal middleweight champion ever. It us hard to pico between Pavlik and Taylor since Taylor beat Hopkins and then Pavlik destroyed Taylor. Sérgio Martinez looked sensational in every outung on HBO. He was also an excellent 154 pounder. Yea I would say Sergio had by far the most impressive performances. If we're going solely off names, I'd say Taylor's two wins over B-Hop hold the most value.

Canelo and Cotto's resumes are the worst of any lineal middleweight champion ever. It us hard to pico between Pavlik and Taylor since Taylor beat Hopkins and then Pavlik destroyed Taylor. Sérgio Martinez looked sensational in every outung on HBO. He was also an excellent 154 pounder.

Personally, I'd say: 1.) Jermain Taylor 2.) Sergio Martinez 3.) Gennady Golovkin 4.) Kelly Pavlik 5.) Miguel Cotto 6.) Saul Alvarez