This is what a p4p fighter looks like. Not a 12 rd ud snooze fest with 3 pitty patty punches thrown each rd. Andrade got dropped by vanes and struggled in a sd win. Charlo struggled as well. Lara did twice as well. GGG goes in and takes a big dump on all 3 and shows why he's p4p. These 3 fighters are worshipped by many posters on this forum. GGG gets it done in 2 rds in stopping a fighter who has never ever been dominated.
This is what a p4p fighter looks like. Not a 12 rd ud snooze fest with 3 pitty patty punches thrown each rd. Andrade got dropped by vanes and struggled in a sd win. Charlo struggled as well. Lara did twice as well. GGG goes in and takes a big dump on all 3 and shows why he's p4p. These 3 fighters are worshipped by many posters on this forum. GGG gets it done in 2 rds in stopping a fighter who has never ever been dominated.
I told you brother, GGG is doing what others guys aren't willing to do!!!
Too many posters on this forum worshipping boring cheating cowards like Bernard Hopkins who ducked his entire jail sentence like a god damn disgraceful irresponsible little child!!
Makes me so god damn angry, GGG is the king of this sport its about time ppl step up and pay respect.
they all beat him, except the one draw on TD. they all beat him, they are the same as GGG, not different, there is no requirement to ko someone to beat them.
But GGG's win was the most spectacular.
goes to show how average they are. the weight and lay off would have nade a difference but not THAT big of a difference. unless people think if he was a bit more active and heavier, he'd have gone from getting ko'd in 2 to 'exposing' golovkin. cause people have said all 3 of the other fighters would have exposed golovkin lol
Vanes is almost 6 1. I cringe when people bring up size into play here. They are almost the same size.
When Hopkins fought Joppy, Joppy was coming off a 14 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Hakkar, Hakker was coming off a 10 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Carl Daniels, Daniels was coming off a 13 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Keith Holmes, Holmes was coming off a 12 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Echols (the first fight), Echols was coming off an 11 month lay-off.
Hopkins fans are doing disservice to him. When they start ****ting on GGG using Hopkin's resume, it is no surprise that Hopkin's would also be closely scrutinized but the fact is, most boxers pull some kind of **** that can be criticized without context.
GGG gets no credit because we as true boxing fans and some of us actually box and train in martial arts and boxing or jujitsu actually know that being a professional fighter and taking a 2 year layoff and being retired and not being that good but elusive in the ring a long time ago, that your skills actually fade and without constant sharpening and fights at that high level and when you move up and fight the middle weight champion who hits like a mac truck you better be in tip top shape and not retired and just a okay 154 pound fighter who used to be slick, buts that's it.
When Hopkins fought Joppy, Joppy was coming off a 14 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Hakkar, Hakker was coming off a 10 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Carl Daniels, Daniels was coming off a 13 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Keith Holmes, Holmes was coming off a 12 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Echols (the first fight), Echols was coming off an 11 month lay-off.
Only a biased golovkin hater would give him no credit for koing a guy no one came close to doing or even dominating him.
This is the problem with being a male groupie. Any viewpoint that doesn't agree with you is considered "hate". Take GGG's dck out your throat man. Why does GGG get credit for doing something EVERYBODY predicted he would do? do the Warriors get credit for beating the Lakers? no. Why? Lakers are trash.
Zero credit. None. This fight was the equivalent of a Youtube ad. Hopefully next fight the competition is from a higher tier. That's not hating that's called being a fan and wanting to see top guys face each other.
The GGG defence force is pathetic.The GGG haters are the pathetic ones. He is the longest reigning champion in boxing today He just tied Hopkins's record for successful middleweight defenses and in two years less time. He has never lost. He doesn't need defending. He defends himself very well. He has the best record of any middleweight fighting today. He is ranked top 5 or higher PFP on every credible pound for pound list including Ring, Boxrec, HBO, ESPN and Boxing Scene. Jermall and Bread Man Edwards both called him an all time great middleweight.
Oh damn I thought the GGG haters wont be watching this "terrible" fight. Jeez your favorite fighters Lara, Andrade and Charlo all got exposed after tonight. You gotta find somebody else now to "expose" GGG. Hahaha, pls never mention these chumps again.
They're the same size. Vanes is also taller with longer reach. If you think ggg is much bigger than vanes you are blind.
Ggg is a natural mw vanes isn’t. That’s why they are called weight classes and not height classes
154. a whooping 6 pounds lighter. If Lara and Andrade had been six pounds heavier how likely would they be to knock him out when they couldn't hurt him at 154? GGG is only 4% heavier than Lara and Andrade were when they fought Vanes. He just hits with a lot more power and accuracy. Vanes fought all of them and he knows who is the best.
The uppercut ggg landed to start the onslaught from long distance takes an enormous amount of skill. Not too mention his jabs and feints threw vanes off. GGG is on another level with his boxing. Even vanes said post fight.
Vanes didn't need to cut any weight and ggg was not 6 lbs heavier. He was only 3 lbs heavier fight night. Size wise they are almost even. Nice try though. Epic fail.
Dude just stop. Ggg bullied a smaller inactive fighter. Complete garbage and everyone knows I’m a ggg fan. I call it like I see it.
They're the same size. Vanes is also taller with longer reach. If you think ggg is much bigger than vanes you are blind.
Vanes is a semi retired JMW with a two year layoff coming off a loss. GGG gets zero credit for this. Zero. Consider this fight a commercial in Golovkin's career. It came and went now its time to get back to the program.
Only a biased golovkin hater would give him no credit for koing a guy no one came close to doing or even dominating him.
In what year and what weight division did those fights take place?154. a whooping 6 pounds lighter. If Lara and Andrade had been six pounds heavier how likely would they be to knock him out when they couldn't hurt him at 154? GGG is only 4% heavier than Lara and Andrade were when they fought Vanes. He just hits with a lot more power and accuracy. Vanes fought all of them and he knows who is the best.
Vanes is still in his prime. For the first time he didn't have to cut weight. He's at the best he's ever been.
GGG ducking Lara, Charlo and Andrade tho. LMAO
You are one dumb mother fu*ckin' c0cksmoker