Wow! Eddie Hearn lying Again "We Are Not Asking For Proof Of Funds"

:rofl: Old but gold.

Always been like this with Hearn... Hearn: Khan has turned down 8mil to fight Brook. Khan: No one said anything about 8mil, if you can guarantee that then you've got a fight. Hearn: OMG Khan is DEMANDING 8mil for the Brook fight, he's priced himself out! Hearn: If Wilder comes here to fight Whyte, his name would be much bigger and it'll set up the AJ fight. Wilder: Guarantee me AJ after Whyte and I'll do it. Hearn: Doesn't work that way mate. Just two examples but it's always been like this and the Hearn fanboys love it. hahaha exactly these guys over in the united queendom have such an inferiority complex it leads them to believe in such characters and twist their own words as if they were eddies himself

7:07 https://youtu.be/NQNDE43VqR8 This is what he has been ranting about for over a week, now he is acting dumbfounded that people think he wants proof of the money. Wtf? (Someone embed it please I cant on my phone) You are an imbecile.

Always been like this with Hearn... Hearn: Khan has turned down 8mil to fight Brook. Khan: No one said anything about 8mil, if you can guarantee that then you've got a fight. Hearn: OMG Khan is DEMANDING 8mil for the Brook fight, he's priced himself out! Hearn: If Wilder comes here to fight Whyte, his name would be much bigger and it'll set up the AJ fight. Wilder: Guarantee me AJ after Whyte and I'll do it. Hearn: Doesn't work that way mate. Just two examples but it's always been like this and the Hearn fanboys love it.

I know this is hard for you guys, but use all your might and try to focus on how those two statements are different. In America, we had this song for children, "one of these things is not like the other." Maybe there's some American children that can help you understand. BTW, the principle here is very simple. I can't be repeating it to you guys all day so re-read as many times as you need if you require clarification. You are literally offering nothing. Seriously, what are you talking about?

Why are you wasting your time going back and forth with that complete and utter moron. Eddie Hearn could literally say anything and that cuck would slurp it up and defend it without shame. I have misplaced hope in humanity and believe I can get through too some people lol..

Hearn must have seen some type of proof if he proclaimed there was a 70% chance the fight gets done. The dude is full of crap as usual.

Are you deliberately being stupid? 1. Proof of funds hasn't been provided. 2. Finkel said no proof will be provided until an offer is accepted. No offer has been accepted. If proof has been provided, maybe Finkel is the liar seeing as he said that wasn't going to happen? 3. Hearn may have revised his approach by getting answers to his questions, THEN accepting a money offer THEN getting proof of funds. So he may not request proof of funds right now, but when Finkel and Haymon are happy that Hearn and Joshua are happy to press ahead. I know this is hard for you guys, but use all your might and try to focus on how those two statements are different. In America, we had this song for children, "one of these things is not like the other." Maybe there's some American children that can help you understand. BTW, the principle here is very simple. I can't be repeating it to you guys all day so re-read as many times as you need if you require clarification.

"bu bu bu but wilder fans dont want the fight"

Look at the minions trying to distract from the subject. :lol1: Hearn says he needs proof of funds. Hearn says he is not asking for proof of funds. I know you guys are a little short on mental capacity but even you can see the issue there. Maybe it's time to stop embarrassing yourself for some douchebag who doesn't know you exist and just say, "hey, he's full of shyt! " Are you deliberately being stupid? 1. Proof of funds hasn't been provided. 2. Finkel said no proof will be provided until an offer is accepted. No offer has been accepted. If proof has been provided, maybe Finkel is the liar seeing as he said that wasn't going to happen? 3. Hearn may have revised his approach by getting answers to his questions, THEN accepting a money offer THEN getting proof of funds. So he may not request proof of funds right now, but when Finkel and Haymon are happy that Hearn and Joshua are happy to press ahead.

Are you totally retarded ? Proof of funds arent relevant if they cant answer the questions hes sent them . Proof of funds would then be looked at bc negotiating would start if it checks out . You CANT have a fight if no stipulations are giving first . Proof of funds are legally required , all hes asking is the 5 questions he wants answered at this point bc Finkel refused to even meet last week . Many of these Wilder loons are definitely not that intelligent. It is obvious what is going on here. Hearn wants ALL the terms and conditions (and rightfully so) and these thinking impaired morons think that’s not reasonable. Hearn wants proof of funds AMONG OTHER THINGS

Look at the minions trying to distract from the subject. :lol1: Hearn says he needs proof of funds. Hearn says he is not asking for proof of funds. I know you guys are a little short on mental capacity but even you can see the issue there. Maybe it's time to stop embarrassing yourself for some douchebag who doesn't know you exist and just say, "hey, he's full of shyt! "

this is too much smh, lets see how the hearn fanatics spin this one after crying about proof of funds for 2 weeks. 1. He has confirmed he has received no proof of funds. There is no confirmation from Finkel or Haymon of proof of funds, if there was they will have called Eddie on any bullsh*t. 2. He has said all along there are many things to find out about, besides proof of funds before they can agree on an offer, hence why he is asking these questions and Haymon is answering. He is not changing the story here. 3. Wilders offer expired after 24hrs. They are quite possibly discussing a new offer right now that doesn't require proof of funds until all other terms are met. Seriously, take Wilders nuts out of your mouth. Hearn and Haymon are clearly trying to make the fight. You make out like Hearn lies about everything and moves the goal posts yet Haymon appears happy to be working with him. I see no quotes from Wilders team that Hearn is being unreasonable right now.

Not really sure why the wilders defenders have an issue with this interview. To me this reads positive news; sounds like rather than a load of chat through the media the teams are actually discussing privately and let’s be honest - that’s how the deal would get done. If we keep hearing media clippets of discussions it’s unlikely . Wilder's camp have apparently shown Hearn that the money is there to cover what Joshua asked for. That should be the end it, the handshake should've been done, and everyone would then sit down to talk over how to maximize the event. That doesn't seem to be what's been put forward to the press; rather than shaking hands on moving onto the details, Eddie Hearn's public posture is that he's not willing to agree to anything, even on a handshake, before all of the details are filled in, over some nonsense about public image. Team Wilder, with the event under their control, wants to create the biggest event possible. There's nothing in the UK that would take the fight away from MGM Resorts, and there's near nothing that would take the fight away from Showtime in the US, but everything else seems negotiable. Nothing in the UK brings more money to the pot off of TV than Sky Box Office, so odds are good that Sky gets the UK rights. The main event sponsor tied with Team Wilder is Corona, and that's likely going to stay the same; if Hearn has sponsors that also want to host the fight in addition to Corona, I don't see Team Wilder saying no. TSN will get the rights to the fight in Canada (unless Bell puts the fight on PPV), and TV Azteca seems set to have the rights to the fight for Mexico, but it's basically a free-for-all in almost every other TV market (Canal Space for the rest of Latin America, SuperSport for nearly all of Africa, Polsat in Poland, PPV in Australia seem to be the only set relationships that Team Wilder has for Wilder's fights); any other TV money that Hearn could bring to the table won't get shunned, lol. If the fear is that a handshake agreement can be made, but he may have to walk away from the deal because he couldn't convince Team Wilder to use StubHub instead of Ticketmaster to host tickets for the event, he needs to make that clear

7:07 https://youtu.be/NQNDE43VqR8 This is what he has been ranting about for over a week, now he is acting dumbfounded that people think he wants proof of the money. Wtf? (Someone embed it please I cant on my phone) this is too much smh, lets see how the hearn fanatics spin this one after crying about proof of funds for 2 weeks. Hearn literally just lied too your face and you still defend him??? We had dozens of arseholes here shouting, "They don't even have proof of funds" because Hearn said it. Now, he's re-written the script so his little puppets are doing the same. What clowns. These Eddie Hearn slurpers are unbelievable. First they say the $50 million is a PR stunt. Now that proof was provided they switch to "but but five questions doe".. Fckn brainless neanderthals. Simple explanation for you simpletons: AJ and Hearn were sent an offer by Wilder and Finkel, and told they had 24 hours to accept it. Hearn said he couldn't accept the offer without seeing the details, including proof of funds, and asked to meet with Finkel to discuss it. Finkel refused to discuss anything with Hearn unless AJ accepted the offer first. That was more than 24 hours ago. A lot more than 24 hours ago. Since then, Hearn has by-passed Finkel and opened up a dialogue with Al Haymon, which he describes as "very productive" The questions he was talking about in that video are for Haymon, not Finkel, and whether AJ's $50million exists is not one of them, because Haymon isn't asking him to accept a $50million+ offer without knowing the details. Simple innit.

Surely even wilder's super fans now know that all this 50 million crap was just promotional BS to whip up interest in the brazil fight?

Not really sure why the wilders defenders have an issue with this interview. To me this reads positive news; sounds like rather than a load of chat through the media the teams are actually discussing privately and let’s be honest - that’s how the deal would get done. If we keep hearing media clippets of discussions it’s unlikely . Has nothing to do with "Wilder defenders". I say negative stuff about Deontay all the time. We have a legion of annoying fanboys here who take their script directly from Hearn's twitter and get militant with it. If I gotta see these clowns quoting me every day using the "proof" argument, you can sure bet I'm going to laugh at the idiots when they get exposed like this. Hearn is a promoter. That means he's lying scum just like Arum and DLH. Why anyone would become a fan of a promoter is beyond me. Embarrassing way for a person to be a boxing fan. :lol1:

Not really sure why the wilders defenders have an issue with this interview. To me this reads positive news; sounds like rather than a load of chat through the media the teams are actually discussing privately and let’s be honest - that’s how the deal would get done. If we keep hearing media clippets of discussions it’s unlikely .

These Eddie Hearn slurpers are unbelievable. First they say the $50 million is a PR stunt. Now that proof was provided they switch to "but but five questions doe".. Fckn brainless neanderthals.

He asked for proof of funds saying he never received it then Finkle says he sent it. Now he’s saying he never asked for it........ again he’s lying too you and your ok with it??? Why are you wasting your time going back and forth with that complete and utter moron. Eddie Hearn could literally say anything and that cuck would slurp it up and defend it without shame.