Bigger hypejob Pacquiao, Golovkin, Broner, Mora or Lomachenko?

Not saying he was on his last legs, but at the time, everyone thought that he was close to being done, especially moving up. Tha'ts what the big deal was, the surprise that he did so well. If it was expected those wins wouldn't have had so much fanfare. Literally no one on the planet thought he was close to done in 2008. LITERALLY. He was considered damn near invincible post Oscar.

I have not once said that. I am saying he wasn't finished as he clearly was not. As for being on his "last legs" in 2008/09 that is just ridiculous and completely untrue. Not saying he was on his last legs, but at the time, everyone thought that he was close to being done, especially moving up. Tha'ts what the big deal was, the surprise that he did so well. If it was expected those wins wouldn't have had so much fanfare.

Smh. Sacrifices I made were not for fun. Know your place. Customer. Sure. Sure. Keep telling us that. Nobody cares. So you put your entire life in and are a badass but accomplished absolutely nothing in Boxing and then you go around calling hall of fame fighters frauds and bums. You are a disgrace. Pulling a fake rank on a forum to prove a point? That's looserville status. Don't respond. Your going on ignore, clown.

I've fought before but not a great amount. 5-6 years just training and sparring for fun nothing too deep. I probably have spent $100k or more on traveling the world to watch fights. Not a great amount but not sure the relevance to that and scoring a fight. You had Bradley beating Pacquaio and agreed with Lewis-Holyfield and Whitaker-Chavez I thought all three were bogus. Not sure why this is all relevant maybe your just trying to pull a fake rank to feel better about yourself? Your a trash poster and everyone knows that. A waste of an account. A fanboy and a hater. Smh. Sacrifices I made were not for fun. Know your place. Customer.

Now I'm an alternate account? That's the best you can do? Smh. Look idiot, answer this truthfully - what have you sacrificed in your life for the sport? I've fought before but not a great amount. 5-6 years just training and sparring for fun nothing too deep. I probably have spent $100k or more on traveling the world to watch fights. Not a great amount but not sure the relevance to that and scoring a fight. You had Bradley beating Pacquaio and agreed with Lewis-Holyfield and Whitaker-Chavez I thought all three were bogus. Not sure why this is all relevant maybe your just trying to pull a fake rank to feel better about yourself? Your a trash poster and everyone knows that. A waste of an account. A fanboy and a hater.

Never went to Lewis-Holyfield stop lying. So your "guarantee" is a load of ****. Been to a ton of fights though. I mentioned Pacquaio-Bradley as an example of I even wanted Bradley to win and put money on Bradley (you know in Las Vegas you can bet on sports) and even I knew Pacquaio won easy. Never collected a "rookie card" either and not into the posters thing. Maybe that's the closest you've got to the fights hence why you bring it up. Sorry you don't get to that many fights they are a lot of fun. Also LOL at the fake rank you pull implying you've actually boxed. Nobody cares if you did or didn't. But to use a fake rank to act like you know how to score a fight better is comedy. Nobody cares what you say period you alt. Now I'm an alternate account? That's the best you can do? Smh. Look idiot, answer this truthfully - what have you sacrificed in your life for the sport?

Nowhere near as much as the other turds. lol hey is that really Oscar in the hamburglar suit?

Have you ever had a debate where you didn't mention you were at some fight? Is that where a convo with you always leads to? I'm assuming you brought up the other fights because @ some point you would say "I was ringside for Holyfield Lewis!" Assuming - I can guarantee that was your intentions. Listen idiot. You're on a boxing forum - not a YouTube video. No one here cares how many rookie cards or posters you've collected. Probably never took the headgear off. Never went to Lewis-Holyfield stop lying. So your "guarantee" is a load of ****. Been to a ton of fights though. I mentioned Pacquaio-Bradley as an example of I even wanted Bradley to win and put money on Bradley (you know in Las Vegas you can bet on sports) and even I knew Pacquaio won easy. Never collected a "rookie card" either and not into the posters thing. Maybe that's the closest you've got to the fights hence why you bring it up. Sorry you don't get to that many fights they are a lot of fun. Also LOL at the fake rank you pull implying you've actually boxed. Nobody cares if you did or didn't. But to use a fake rank to act like you know how to score a fight better is comedy. Nobody cares what you say period you alt.

GGG and Loma,, everyone always knew broner was sh1t nobody hyped him up This post was hilarious

LOL I'm far from a Pacquaio fan and I was actually at that fight and made money with a drunken bet on Bradley but it's hard to give Bradley more than 3 rounds on an objective scorecard which is what I had. Pacquaio lost 4 to Marquez but he didn't lost to Bradley. He handled him easily each time. Have you ever had a debate where you didn't mention you were at some fight? Is that where a convo with you always leads to? I'm assuming you brought up the other fights because @ some point you would say "I was ringside for Holyfield Lewis!" Assuming - I can guarantee that was your intentions. Listen idiot. You're on a boxing forum - not a YouTube video. No one here cares how many rookie cards or posters you've collected. Probably never took the headgear off.

You're all over the place. Responding to your own questions and answers. Get it together. Focus. You said "Manny handled Bradley easily in 2012." I pointed out your blatantly false statement as an example as to why Manny is considered a hypejob. Because delusional Pact@rds refused to acknowledge Mannys failures. Do it long enough the failures turn into "handled easily". LOL I'm far from a Pacquaio fan and I was actually at that fight and made money with a drunken bet on Bradley but it's hard to give Bradley more than 3 rounds on an objective scorecard which is what I had. Pacquaio lost 4 to Marquez but he didn't lost to Bradley. He handled him easily each time.

You lost credibility here. I can't believe you think chavez-Whitaker, Holyfield-Lewis 1 were fair decisions. Stop it. 95+% people had the fight scored correctly. Judges often get fights wrong. You're all over the place. Responding to your own questions and answers. Get it together. Focus. You said "Manny handled Bradley easily in 2012." I pointed out your blatantly false statement as an example as to why Manny is considered a hypejob. Because delusional Pact@rds refused to acknowledge Mannys failures. Do it long enough the failures turn into "handled easily".

GGG and Loma,, everyone always knew broner was sh1t nobody hyped him up

Who the hell ever hyped up Mora? He won the contender and got hyped up

Yes. Bradley clearly and definitively out boxed Manny their first fight. Executed a flawless game plan ( that he did not implement in the 2nd and 3rd fight and lost.) Guess who else agreed with me? The judges. You're just a fan and are entitled to your opinion if you feel Manny won - but that is just YOUR opinion. Not a fact. Stop acting as if YOUR opinion is a fact. Its time to acknowledge it for what it is - an official loss. And why the hell was Manny struggling with a B level in house fighter anyway? Nevertheless you said Manny handled Bradley easily - stop it. You lost credibility here. I can't believe you think chavez-Whitaker, Holyfield-Lewis 1 were fair decisions. Stop it. 95+% people had the fight scored correctly. Judges often get fights wrong.

pacquiao.......

Which boxer was hyped up but crumbled on the biggest stage? Manny pacquiao Ggg Adrien bronee Sergio mora the latina snake Or lomachenko? Lmao at Pacquaio being a hype job. Did this be@ner just watch boxing yesterday?

You really think Bradley won? Dude I was happy he got robbed and won some drunken money I placed in Vegas that night but nah. Let me guess you think Chavez got a legit draw with Whitaker and Lewis was really only 1-0-1 against Holyfield and that Williams beat Lara? You also think Pacquaio really won fight 3 with Marquez? God your dumb. You are a horrible judge. Pacquaio lost all the Marquez fights but he clearly beat Bradley 3 times. Yes. Bradley clearly and definitively out boxed Manny their first fight. Executed a flawless game plan ( that he did not implement in the 2nd and 3rd fight and lost.) Guess who else agreed with me? The judges. You're just a fan and are entitled to your opinion if you feel Manny won - but that is just YOUR opinion. Not a fact. Stop acting as if YOUR opinion is a fact. Its time to acknowledge it for what it is - an official loss. And why the hell was Manny struggling with a B level in house fighter anyway? Nevertheless you said Manny handled Bradley easily - stop it.

No man, YOU put Mosley on a pedestal in 2010. YOU put Ortiz on a pedestal in 2011. Remember? I know you do :lol1: Floyd fans don't need to put his opponents on a pedestal when clowns like you do it just fine. Bwhahahahahaha

Broner.. When was mora ever hyped besides shortly after the contender, and he never was pushed by the major players. Broner easily... Manny, loma, and ggg have all proven to be the goods