The irony of TROY KING destroying GGG's record on Ego's

He bashed GGG's record on this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rjLsHHDf7Y For the record, GGG has beaten Brook, Ouma, Jacobs, Lemieux, Geale wich means 5 pro world champions. That's not an awesome ATG record by any means but still a very good record. I agree GGG could have fought better opp, but you gotta respect his record too. Let's have a look at Troy King's opposition, dude is undefeated with 8 wins. 2016-03-26 Carlos Martinez 1W 6L 2015-12-19 Juan M. Rodriguez 5W 10L 2015-11-07 Luis Alfredo Lugo 14W 23L 1D 2015-08-29 Carlos Martinez 1W 3L 0D 2015-07-11 Jesus Michel debut 2015-05-30 Jonathan Sanchez 0W 1L 0D 2014-09-26 Miguel Angel Galan debut 2014-02-07 Victor Acosta debut So, he still has to fight a fighter with a winning record after 8 pro fights, yet has the nerve to throw GGG's record to the trash. So my question to conclude is, how can you bash a record like GGG's who is a unified champion when you're YOURSELF A PRO FIGHTER, and has been fighting only loosing or debut records fighters for your whole career. My answer, is, the hatred that some have towards "european" fighters makes them so blind that they actually come with such closet analysis. Troy King said in another video that he would be a champ with the right promoter and called triple "just a jabber". I guess his promoter can't find him opponents with winning records. Typical overconfident guy who has only been fighting beginners and mexican journey men. I hope he can't step up soon from mexican village level to show us how he's a better fighter than triple.

Comments (20)

BillyBoxing

Stopped reading after the first line because only a delusional clown would make an argument like that. That is such a high school level argument. Embarrassingly bad. Yet coming back with insult like Clown but no argument himself. Typical "I don't get it my own way" sissy btching answer from Red, disappointing bro. We can disagree, but I'm not here to insult you because I disagree, or being accusing of being a "liar" when I didn't lie in the first place. You can tell Brook is a sht win, was too small, but saying he's a world champ is not a lie.

8y ago

BillyBoxing

What are you not sure about? That there are racially motivated white boxing fans in the US? I'm sure, but I would say that there are not less racially motivated black boxing fans. There is a double standards bro. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeELKWqEGlM Look just at Tabiti takes on nelo's positive, "I wouldn't surprised if GGG takes it too","I don't need it I got that african blood". Typical racist closet stuff, discrediting GGG at the same time. Imagine if a guy said something like that for exemple "I don't need to cheat at school, I got that european blood". I'm european, I have no beef with afro americans, but man, many of those guys on medias sound racist as fck, I'm just telling you

8y ago

KingHippo

I'm not sure about that, Joshua seems to be more popular worldwide or in the US than Klit has been as a dominant figure. People sure don't like garbage idiots throwing dollars away in a night club and getting convicted for women assault like Broner or Floyd, and this is not related to their colour IMO. What are you not sure about? That there are racially motivated white boxing fans in the US?

8y ago

uppercut510

In all honesty who is this guy and why should I care about his opinion? he used to be on boxingego channel alot

8y ago

Redd_Foxx

There is no lie in counting Brook as a boxing world champ, I never said he was "a 160 champion" wich would be a lie. Hagler fought Hearns, Duran and Leonard who were all WW. Floyd fought Marquez who jumped 2 divisions, Loma fought Rigo, Ruiz fought 2 divisions smaller Jones jr and lost. I don't see them getting their wins bashed in the same way by the Red Foxx and Troy King of the world, except Loma maybe, wonder why.... Stopped reading after the first line because only a delusional clown would make an argument like that. That is such a high school level argument. Embarrassingly bad.

8y ago

BillyBoxing

TS is counting Brook as "beating a world champion"???? I can't wrap my head around that kind of stupidity. The guy jumped 2 divisions for the first time ever and never returned. He was not a world champ at 160 or even the division below it. When you have to lie to try to make a point, that should tell you that you were wrong to begin with. There is no lie in counting Brook as a boxing world champ, I never said he was "a 160 champion" wich would be a lie. Hagler fought Hearns, Duran and Leonard who were all WW. Floyd fought Marquez who jumped 2 divisions, Loma fought Rigo, Ruiz fought 2 divisions smaller Jones jr and lost. I don't see them getting their wins bashed in the same way by the Red Foxx and Troy King of the world, except Loma maybe, wonder why....

8y ago

BillyBoxing

How is Broner rated? The guy was a 3 division champ at the height of his popularity and riding off Mayweather's coatails who is one of the greatest boxers to have ever boxed. Not to mention that Broner wasn't from Zimbabwe, but from America. American fighters used to have special push, but now it's turning to Eastern Europeans because many American and world boxing fans like the idea of a dominant white boxer more than a black one. I'm not sure about that, Joshua seems to be more popular worldwide or in the US than Klit has been as a dominant figure. People sure don't like garbage idiots throwing dollars away in a night club and getting convicted for women assault like Broner or Floyd, and this is not related to their colour IMO.

8y ago

satiev1

there were better fights out there that golovkin could've easily pushed for, but he was simply set on chasing a payday, and that's been his mo since he missed out on being paid by universum. Cry about the style matchup all you want, erislandy lara and demetrius andrade were both sitting around, in need of good fights, when golovkin and his camp cherry picked gabriel rosado to have his first fight at middleweight for golovkin's paper belt (and even that didn't go smooth). he fought a welterweight for ****'s sake (and even that didn't go smooth). Hindsight will be what it is, but golovkin is finally being shown for the fighter that he and his camp tried to hide for as long as they did; you put him in with a fighter with any kind of boxing craft and some confidence and golovkin ends up looking ordinary. How do folks justify the fact that he's defended his interim belt all of 17 times, yet you can only point to maybe 3 of those defenses where he was in with a middleweight worth fighting? that's a lie.

8y ago

TAKEOVER7209

Who the fook is Troy king?

8y ago

strykr619

He's a professional boxer with an opinion...automatically more credible than opinions of armchair warriors (like YOU) lmfaoooo Huh so because he has fought professionally that means our opinions don't mean ****, that's like me saying because i did two combat tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan only my opinion counts when it comes to war fighters and no one else does. Pretty stupid logic.

8y ago

boxinggod101

And tbh before he beat Jacobs and Canelo, GGG wasnt P4P level that's for sure

8y ago

boxinggod101

He's a professional boxer with an opinion...automatically more credible than opinions of armchair warriors (like YOU) lmfaoooo Actually he looks like a race baiter. My non bias opinion makes more sense.

8y ago

Redd_Foxx

8y ago

Scipio2009

Canelo, Jacobs just last year. He beat them by the way if you ask me or any person who knows sht about boxing. The truth is Canelo is PED cheat Vegas protected Golden Boy cash cow and he get a gift draw in a fight where 90% of pro boxers for exemple thought he widely lost (Malignaggi, Crawford, JMM, Badou Jack, Jacobs, Quillin, Saunders) Agree or disagree on the official outcome, Jacobs was a 7-5 fight, Alvarez was a 7-5 fight, and even Kell Brook was able to box Golovkin pretty much even until the eye completely went. The second fight will likely happen in a couple months time, but even now, we're likely talking about another 7-5 fight if Alvarez's stamina fails him again. You put Billy Joe Saunders in there with Golovkin, based on what we've seen him show against folks worth fighting, and it's a quite likely possibility that he could end up getting skunked in that fight. Alvarez was popped for trace amounts of the substance nearly a full actual fight camp removed the actual fight. If you want to hang on that, so be it

8y ago

Scipio2009

How about just everyone in his division who would fight him. Is that not enough for you or should he chase everyone In every division for a fight also? He can only fight who's there, he can't manufacture ATG opponents to line up across from him. There were better fights out there that Golovkin could've easily pushed for, but he was simply set on chasing a payday, and that's been his mo since he missed out on being paid by Universum. Cry about the style matchup all you want, Erislandy Lara and Demetrius Andrade were both sitting around, in need of good fights, when Golovkin and his camp cherry picked Gabriel Rosado to have his first fight at middleweight for Golovkin's paper belt (and even that didn't go smooth). He fought a welterweight for ****'s sake (and even that didn't go smooth). Hindsight will be what it is, but Golovkin is finally being shown for the fighter that he and his camp tried to hide for as long as they did; you put him in with a fighter with any kind of boxing craft and some confidence and Golovkin ends up looking ordinary. How do folks justify the fact that he's defended his interim belt all of 17 times, yet you can only point to maybe 3 of those defenses where he was in with a middleweight worth fighting?

8y ago

KingHippo

Same for Broner? How is Broner rated? The guy was a 3 division champ at the height of his popularity and riding off Mayweather's coatails who is one of the greatest boxers to have ever boxed. Not to mention that Broner wasn't from Zimbabwe, but from America. American fighters used to have special push, but now it's turning to Eastern Europeans because many American and world boxing fans like the idea of a dominant white boxer more than a black one.

8y ago

UNBIASED_BOXING

there's no need for the dick slurping homie. this is boxing talk. keep it civil. Dickriding is unnecessary. put the dildo back in the closet and lets discuss like gentlemen. we can go round for round I'll tell you which rounds I gave Jacobs and you tell me which rounds you gave GGG. go read the comments on the fight on Youtube I'm not the only one that had DJ winning. ESPN 115-112 Golovkin HBO 115-112 Golovkin The Ring Magazine 115-112 Golovkin The Guardian 115-112 Golovkin International Business Times 115-112 Golovkin LA Times 114-113 Golovkin Boxing Scene 114-113 Golovkin Associated Press 114-113 Golovkin Bad Left Hook 114-113 Golovkin CBS 114-114 Telegraph 114-114 Yahoo 114-113 Jacobs Box Nation 114-113 Jacobs USA Today 115-113 Jacobs Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs 15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs close disputed decisions ALWAYS deserve a sequel. Period. that is boxing tradition. Except for: Lara vs Canelo Thurman vs Porter Pacquiao vs Horn Danny Garcia vs Herrera etc...

8y ago

BillyBoxing

Euro trash can't even get a grip on ISIS to the point of BREXIT. Defend that "mate" Ggg is ordinary lmfao and 0-3 his last 2 fights...lost to Danny, lost to Ca$h, and now taking another L by saying Canelos muscles are too big LMFAOOO Yeah keep dreaming

8y ago

BillyBoxing

People like you don't understand from where this ressentment comes from. I believe Golovkin is overrated and that race plays a part in it. And I'm pretty sure this is where Troy's criticism comes from, his record is inconsequential in that case. Same for Broner?

8y ago

_original_

Just to expose with an exemple the usual bias coming from some afro americans towards european fighters. Why make it about race, though? The other black dude in the video posted here picked Lomachenko to beat Walters.

8y ago