NSB Pick'em#11 Dillian Whyte vs Lucas Browne

NSB Pick 'em #11 Dillian Whyte vs Lucas Browne Saturday March 24 2018 BETTING ODDS: Whyte 1/4, Browne 11/4. No multiplier on either fighter. Ways fighters can win: Decision: Wide or Close KO: 1-4; 5-8; 9-12 Examples of the ways you can state your decision: Quote: PICK EM CREW,Brown dec wide PICK EM CREW,Whyte ko 5-8 If you are using no multiplier (1X), and not picking a draw, just type username,DRAW. I will assume you want 1X unless you post otherwise. NOTES: -Draws are worth 120pts. A perfect pick without a multiplier is 30pts. -CLOSE is <12 pts difference, or anything closer than 116-112 on all three scorecards. WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider. -If you'd like to change your pick before the fight starts, post in this thread to do so. Ideally tag me so that I don't miss it. -2X doubles your points and 3X triples your points. Everyone starts with 5 doubles and 3 triples to use throughout the year. If you forget how many you have left, check the leaderboard in the master thread. Sticky me -MEGA- BostonGuy

Comments (20)

SceneBoxer

I deleted a post of mine on this thread to test and it seems there's no trace at all of a deleted post except for the change in post numbers. Anyone has a screenshot of this thread just before this fight started? If so, take note of the post numbers in that screenshot and compare it now if there's a difference. If the post numbers differ then someone posting before the screenshot was taken deleted his post. If post numbers are the same then noone deleted a post. In behalf of, NSAC :D

8y ago

TonyMontana

8y ago

SceneBoxer

Place Robbieterol on 365 24/7 testing... :rofl:

8y ago

john_l

I get that, man, and it ain't about me doubting you - in fact I completely trust you here - but about not wanting to be seen to act without tangible evidence... Like I say, I think the best course is to put it to a poll of the players I agree I would want same benefit then just a couple guys who could be alts saying I cheated.I just hope people know I would not say it otherwise.It should be stickyed if that a word otherwise It will drop quik and now my word is on line also.

8y ago

Citizen_Koba

There was no missed # of posts but I know he did and Drama show too.If no proof then fine but don't think you need to be caught cheating twice to get DQed imo.Once is enough in my book.I just hope everyone knows I would NEVER do this if I was not 1000% sure.I would never want someone to ?s my integrity.But I just know on this. I get that, man, and it ain't about me doubting you - in fact I completely trust you here - but about not wanting to be seen to act without tangible evidence... Like I say, I think the best course is to put it to a poll of the players

8y ago

john_l

Thing we got is that john doesn't think Robbie used a mult so it's hard to fathom why he'd delete... nonetheless we've got john who's dead sure and siablo and Drama saying he made a pick too. I'm very reluctant to take it any further without solid evidence, but it's probably one of those occasions where the will of the players should be heard. No he did not use a xs(which if I was out to get him I would say he used a x3)but it goes to show if he would cheat just to have a better % he would cheat at ANYTHING.But agree its hard to do something like a DQ(which I think you should get 1st time cheating)if we don't have proof or a couple more who remember idk its tough but in all honesty I would bet my life on it or would not have said anything.

8y ago

Citizen_Koba

Tricky Nobody has proof robbie cheated but everybody agrees he did He picked browne so for him to cheat he must have used a multiplier Anybody caught cheating need to be disqualified But there needs to be evidence Thing we got is that john doesn't think Robbie used a mult so it's hard to fathom why he'd delete... nonetheless we've got john who's dead sure and siablo and Drama saying he made a pick too. I'm very reluctant to take it any further without solid evidence, but it's probably one of those occasions where the will of the players should be heard.

8y ago

john_l

I was wondering about the post numbers. Posts following a deleted post should keep their original numbers I woulda thought, leaving a gap in the post numbering, although I could be wrong. I meant to experiment with it, but I've been putting my boy to bed. Is there any gaps in post numbering in the pick 'em thread? Anyways. I do trust john in what he says, but I'm reluctant to take any action in the absence of proof - in fact even with proof I'd be reluctant to, that ain't really what this ish should be about - mainly it should be enough that a player is being watched and that he'd have lost the trust and respect of his fellows. A second attempt should probably result in a DQ though. There was no missed # of posts but I know he did and Drama show too.If no proof then fine but don't think you need to be caught cheating twice to get DQed imo.Once is enough in my book.I just hope everyone knows I would NEVER do this if I was not 1000% sure.I would never want someone to ?s my integrity.But I just know on this.

8y ago

Citizen_Koba

Technicians need to only allow them to delete their content but not the fact that they posted. I was wondering about the post numbers. Posts following a deleted post should keep their original numbers I woulda thought, leaving a gap in the post numbering, although I could be wrong. I meant to experiment with it, but I've been putting my boy to bed. Is there any gaps in post numbering in the pick 'em thread? Anyways. I do trust john in what he says, but I'm reluctant to take any action in the absence of proof - in fact even with proof I'd be reluctant to, that ain't really what this ish should be about - mainly it should be enough that a player is being watched and that he'd have lost the trust and respect of his fellows. A second attempt should probably result in a DQ though.

8y ago

siablo14

8y ago

TonyMontana

8y ago

john_l

Hold on. But when did he delete the pick, before or after the fight? Well he already gave up that excuse because he just came on and said he did not vote.And I looked about 30 mins before fight so that would have been possible but why?And like I said he just boxed himself in by saying he never voted.

8y ago

siablo14

Hold on. But when did he delete the pick, before or after the fight? Most likely after when he saw the result.

8y ago

siablo14

doesnt really bother me but i dont think fights like kelly v molina or price v povetkin are needed. 99 percent of people would pick kelly and povetkin and they arent big fights really. i think if theres a dearth of match ups then you could do them types of fight, but best to keep it to the bigger fights for the most part. True. Parker-Joshua is okay by itself for this week.

8y ago

siablo14

Explain what? How i didn't make a pick? I kinda remember you picking Browne too.

8y ago

Szef

Explain what? How i didn't make a pick? I know he did and WOULD NEVER say that otherwise.Morels and honesty is VERY important to me a he ll of a lot more then this game and would NEVER give that up. Hold on. But when did he delete the pick, before or after the fight?

8y ago

siablo14

All good. I'll update the front page of the pick 'em masterthread and we'll mention it at the start of each pick 'em thread. It'll probably take a while for it to filter through to everyone, but I reckon it's worth it. Now: Joshua - Parker is obviously gonna be a pick 'em this week, but what else, if any do we like? Povetkin - Price is the obvious complementary HW match-up but Kelly vs Molina holds a lot of intrigue too. Kelly:1/33;Molina:12/1 To me those odds are too wide for a Pick 'em but over to you and John. Price:7/1;Povetkin:1/16 kind wide too but I am okay with this.

8y ago

john_l

Explain what? How i didn't make a pick? Your lying and YOU KNOW IT.You picked late but YOU PICKED.

8y ago

john_l

All good. I'll update the front page of the pick 'em masterthread and we'll mention it at the start of each pick 'em thread. It'll probably take a while for it to filter through to everyone, but I reckon it's worth it. Now: Joshua - Parker is obviously gonna be a pick 'em this week, but what else, if any do we like? Povetkin - Price is the obvious complementary HW match-up but Kelly vs Molina holds a lot of intrigue too. did not think we were gonna do regional fights and PEDetkin vs Price is a joke of a fight.

8y ago

john_l

I'm not usually interested in other posters' picks so no, but I believe you when you say he did it. Robbie Barrett you got some splainin' to do :rofl: I know he did and WOULD NEVER say that otherwise.Morels and honesty is VERY important to me a he ll of a lot more then this game and would NEVER give that up.

8y ago