The myth of Canelo and GGG, are they really that good?

First off, we need to the take the apples off our eyes and call it what it really is. Are Canelo and GGG really great fighters? These 2 fighters are ranked high on some p4p list even up to 1 and 2 which is ridiculous to me. Before I go further let me say this, I am not a fan of first round KOs, not a fan of 1 punch KOs. I prefer to see a fighter show his stuff rather than just win. I also always felt Kovalev was a better fighter than GGG, hence I never argued when I saw Ward vs Kovalev as 1 and 2 in some p4p list. Starting with GGG, the first time I saw GGG for what he really was is against Rosado who landed about 6 straight punches flush on the head of GGG at the center of the ring while GGG barely ducked, dodged or even covered up. He simply leaned back and received it all. GGG's master defense backed by compubox numbers showing he rarely gets hit is mainly by opponents throwing "stay away" punches. His offense is all about raw power, he lands flush on his opponent and fear kicks in. His incredible ability to cut off the ring can be credited to an injured, sub par opponent who has received those powerful punches and barely steps away. All GGG has to do is step as well thereby cornering the opponent easily. Against opponents with alil bit of upper body movement, footwork and head movement, you can see GGG sliding left and right the ring especially when said oppoenents are on the ropes when he throws punches and misses clean so I'm wondering where this footwork is. Examples will be the Kell Brook, Jacobs and Canelo fight, he went off balance so many times simply by missing punches. Reduce that power and he will be another tough face-first fighter, on the level of Provodnikov. Then when you look at Canelo with 52 fights already, what has he really done? Of course he has improved since the Floyd fights but then what? Barely scraped a win by Lara, didn't look impressive against Cotto...the only worthwhile fight he looked good would be Angulo fight but there are those who say Angulo was done after the Lara beatdown, I think Canelo had a hand in making Angulo look that way with the way their fight started - that huge right hand Canelo started with would give any fighter nightmerish flashbacks. This current great Canelo people are getting pumped over, did a good job against GGG which greatly impressed me but then again, GGG is a fighter who looks good when he can land flush on his opponent. If Canelo does a good job against Saunders, Charlo, Andrade or Jacobs then I can say maybe, if he cleans them all, then yes he is truely an amazing fighter. I feel the love for Canelo and GGG is what is getting them this mythical skills and ability that some of us just don't see. Winning a fight is good but when we are looking at greats or P4P list, it's goes beyond just winning. The P4P list, I don't see how Canelo or GGG ranks higher than Spence, Crawford or Loma even Rigo can be argued. The eye test says Canelo and GGG can't beat those guys, can't even look good against them, maybe Spence but thats it. And those guys can't be considered great yet. What about recent greats, P4P and prime for prime? Pacquiao, Floyd, Ward... Can GGG or Canelo beat those guys? A big No. So what are we so crazy about? Someone kindly explain. I am very open minded to this topic so feel free to convince me.