Does genetics limit south asian (indian) success in boxing?

At least Asians have Pacquiao, Donaire, and Taishan Dong. What do whiteys have except Algieri?

I am Indian and let me tell u, i will remov ur pant from ur ass and SEX U UP BIG TIME!!!! U FCKING *****! India is superpower in 2020, u wont be luaghing then wil u *****!!?? no i think not, tel ur mom i lik her in her ass and ur sister i slap my BIG *** on HER BOBBIES!!! Don't hold back now, tell'em how you really feel.

I am Indian and let me tell u, i will remov ur pant from ur ass and SEX U UP BIG TIME!!!! U FCKING *****! India is superpower in 2020, u wont be luaghing then wil u *****!!?? no i think not, tel ur mom i lik her in her ass and ur sister i slap my BIG *** on HER BOBBIES!!!

Strong username to thread content ratio.

Of course it does. If you were raised on the same diet, environment and with the same training as Usain Bolt, are you going to break world records like him in the 100m sprint? Of course not Why? Because you don't have the same genes there in lies the difference. You don't need a scientific study to prove that Another big mistake your mind tricked you into making. Usain Bolt is a freak of nature and even the differences between him and other elite sprinters from all around the world are marginal. So no, I wouldn't be a world record holder but I'd be an exceptional sprinter for sure.

Until there is proof no sane person would make a claim such as yours. So if you're really that interested in genetics and their influence in athletic ability, go to uni, stay there, get funded, present your results. And don't fix them if the results don't match your expectations. Until then, try to find existing with scientific proof instead of getting caught up in pseudo-science and woowoo bs. Of course it does. If you were raised on the same diet, environment and with the same training as Usain Bolt, are you going to break world records like him in the 100m sprint? Of course not Why? Because you don't have the same genes there in lies the difference. You don't need a scientific study to prove that

This would only explain why Mexicans don't have heavyweight champions, so they dominate lower weight divisions.

There is no denying that genes play an imperative role in athleticism, coordination and strength. Until there is proof no sane person would make a claim such as yours. So if you're really that interested in genetics and their influence in athletic ability, go to uni, stay there, get funded, present your results. And don't fix them if the results don't match your expectations. Until then, try to find existing with scientific proof instead of getting caught up in pseudo-science and woowoo bs.

Mary Kom lol Vijender Singh on the elite Olympic Level. And if you wanna go South Asian, then Amir Khan. Pakistan is right on the border of Indian bruh. Kom won literally everything, Singh medaled in the Olympics and Khan won world titles in multiple weight divisions. And athletically, Khan is one of the most athletic and fastest fighters to step into the ring. He just couldn't take it to the jaw bruh Amir khan is pakistani. 1 boxer from a population of 193 million Mary kom is of different genetics from most indians and looks chinese Vjiender singh is complete trash. If he is the best boxer india has produced it is not saying much. Did you watch his last fight? he got dominated by a nobody from china. He was only gifted the decision because indians can't handle losing to chinese in their own backyard. Vjiender was pathetic in that fight. He displayed not athleticsm whatsoever and nearly got knocked out

Mary Kom lol Vijender Singh on the elite Olympic Level. And if you wanna go South Asian, then Amir Khan. Pakistan is right on the border of Indian bruh. Kom won literally everything, Singh medaled in the Olympics and Khan won world titles in multiple weight divisions. And athletically, Khan is one of the most athletic and fastest fighters to step into the ring. He just couldn't take it to the jaw bruh

Samoans are 56 times more likely to get into the NFL grasp that statistic for a minute

Look at Ukraine - after the Klitschko's, all of a sudden we are getting lots more Ukrainians. India doesn't have a boxing culture. Imagine if only ten million of them started training, sure a few of them make it big and inspire more Indians to box - increases the talent pool hundredfold. It's why some sports are dominated by some countries and some not at all. A country where 50 million people swim from a young age is going to produce more great swimmers than a country where only 100 people swim. You would have a point if indians were genetically the same as ukrainians but they are not and don't have the same genetic potential. There is no denying that genes play an imperative role in athleticism, coordination and strength. Why is 74.4% of the NBA black or 68.7% of the NFL black? Why is it that west African descent athletes dominate in the 100 meter sprint? Surely this cannot be accounted for solely by nutrition or training. All other races in the US have access to the same training facilities and nutrition as american blacks yet blacks have the natural advantage of have more fast twitch muscles and explosiveness. Also here in New Zealand Samoans and polynesians tend to be genetically huge and strong. Quote from 60 mins documentary "It is estimated that a boy born to Samoan parents is 56 times more likely to get into the NFL than any other kid in America" from 60 minutes documentary So are the samoans/polynesians the only children training harder then other boys and have better nutrition or is it their genetics that give them this advantage?

It doesn't take a scientist to conclude that higher lean body mass equates to more strength and power. Women on average have less lean muscle mass than men too hence why they are weaker Are you really that resistant to intelligent thinking? Where does higher lean body mass some individual have compared to others come from? Working out or sitting at home with "better genes"?!

Look at Ukraine - after the Klitschko's, all of a sudden we are getting lots more Ukrainians. India doesn't have a boxing culture. Imagine if only ten million of them started training, sure a few of them make it big and inspire more Indians to box - increases the talent pool hundredfold. It's why some sports are dominated by some countries and some not at all. A country where 50 million people swim from a young age is going to produce more great swimmers than a country where only 100 people swim.

It doesn't take a scientist to conclude that higher lean body mass equates to more strength and power. Women on average have less lean muscle mass than men too hence why they are weaker

Here is some genetic causation for you buddy https://i.imgur.com/LgsIp3E.jpg This is a private company that charges people for woowoo garbage to make them feel better. Try to do a better job.

You don't seem to understand science. You found some studies that look at people and then try to draw conclusions from it without understanding why and assuming things instead That's NOT science. A scientific approach would look entirely different. You'd have to gain a massive sample size of DNA and then look how those different genes react and how they could cause 1) low or high muscle mass and skeletal mass 2) low cardio vascular and lung capacity 3) high body fat and low lean muscle mass 4) grip strength or how the DNA can alter achieving high or low values in either of those categories. IN A LAB, chemical reactions, not scales and calipers. Look up correlation vs causation. show me one indian that can fight on a elite level in any fight sport and I will stop. You get to pick from 1.4 billion people

You don't seem to understand science. You found some studies that look at people and then try to draw conclusions from it without understanding why and assuming things instead That's NOT science. A scientific approach would look entirely different. You'd have to gain a massive sample size of DNA and then look how those different genes react and how they could cause 1) low or high muscle mass and skeletal mass 2) low cardio vascular and lung capacity 3) high body fat and low lean muscle mass 4) grip strength or how the DNA can alter achieving high or low values in either of those categories. IN A LAB, chemical reactions, not scales and calipers. Look up correlation vs causation. Here is some genetic causation for you buddy https://i.imgur.com/LgsIp3E.jpg

jajajaj at calling peer reviewed studies by scientist s bull****, just because you don't agree to what they say or or their implications. There is indeed a link between genes and indian lack of athleticism, cardiovascular health, adiposity, insulin resistance and diabetes. Studies have concluded the same thing over and over. 1. indians have low lean muscle mass and skeletal mass. What does this entail? Skeletal mass in essential for movement and physical function, the less skeletal mass you have the less function or ability and strength. 2. indians have low cardio vascular and lung capacity. Obviously the less oxygen you get the less efficient your body will work, making indians physically less fit. 3. Indians are predisposed to have high body fat and low lean muscle mass which makes them prone to diabetes 4. indians have the weakest grip strength in the world Here is a table demonstrating indian genetic weakness South asians (indians) have the weakest genotype on 23andme in the highest numbers You don't seem to understand science. You found some studies that look at people and then try to draw conclusions from it without understanding why and assuming things instead That's NOT science. A scientific approach would look entirely different. You'd have to gain a massive sample size of DNA and then look how those different genes react and how they could cause 1) low or high muscle mass and skeletal mass 2) low cardio vascular and lung capacity 3) high body fat and low lean muscle mass 4) grip strength or how the DNA can alter achieving high or low values in either of those categories. IN A LAB, chemical reactions, not scales and calipers. Look up correlation vs causation. Take two black twins, let one go to the gym twice a week and feed absolute trash with no exercise to the other one for a year, are they gonna look the same? Are they going to have the same results in your tests? No? End of story, all of your research debunked.

How come «anti racists» such as yourself always bring up athletic ability when it comes to genetics but never intelligence. Africans have a very low IQ on average. Let me guess... racist test? Lmao Fact: If start bringing race into athletic ability you should have no problem bringing in intelligence. I bet you arent even black. You just wish you were / want your wife to get rammes by a black bull What are you talking about what has that got to do with the discussion? And let me guess you are buthurtt at the truth? and no I am not black I am polynesian