Which active boxer do you think has the most impressive win resume?

I don;t like Canelos resume because he feasted on primed out big names. I believe he lost his two biggest fights fair and square against mayweather and GGG. I mean he beat an old cotto, ooold mosley.... Struggled with trout........and lara--His resume looks great but if you dig deeper it's Decent and good but not great

Honestly I'm taking a different route. KOVALEV--He competed to to toe with what most people believed to be the best pfp fighter after mayweather retired --andre ward. Manny yes yes, but he is barely active His performance against ward is better than any other boxers resume not named pacman, Ward is an extremely hard fight, the way he fights. Kovalev scored a legit kd in the first fight which was amazing. Ward is cagey fighter

Outside of guys like pac who are in the verge of being done, It’s obviously Canelo. Roman Gonzalez and Donaire also have good resume’s but they may not have long left either. Outside of that I’d say LSC, Mikey and DSG all have solid resumes

So, even though Manny Pacquiao is fighting and making plans for future fights, he should be called inactive? Is that what you're saying? And your only motivation is because you wanted to claim Gennady Golovkin as somehow having the best current resume? Am I wrong? What is driving you to try to call an active fighter inactive? I should have went with my gut instinct of you being retarded two or three posts ago. You’re the definition of a Pac tard there is no plans at this point that’s all chatter by bob, and if he fights again it’s his retirement fight like cotto is having you don’t count that as a current fighter he’s not in the mix for Crawford or anyone relevant.

Who are you the villiage idiot? Naming a semi retired legend as “current” :lol1: I can garuantee you that’s not what this post was about like I said throw Floyd in there too cause he fought sooner and there is no garuantee Pac even fights again moron. So, even though Manny Pacquiao is fighting and making plans for future fights, he should be called inactive? Is that what you're saying? And your only motivation is because you wanted to claim Gennady Golovkin as somehow having the best current resume? Am I wrong? What is driving you to try to call an active fighter inactive? I should have went with my gut instinct of you being retarded two or three posts ago.

Pacquaio is active so bit of a no brainer. After that Chocolatito has a very good resume and I'd say GGG. The Canelo win gives him the edge of Crawford who Id consider the better pound for pounder currently.

Being "active" isn't a subjective thing. Manny Pacquiao has fought within the past four months. He has plans to have another fight within the next eight months. That makes him active. Just facts. You can call him retired once he's retired. Not before. Who is this A.K. chump? Can someone either back me up on this or give me the low down on who this fool is? Seems to be more of them popping up lately. Who are you the villiage idiot? Naming a semi retired legend as “current” :lol1: I can garuantee you that’s not what this post was about like I said throw Floyd in there too cause he fought sooner and there is no garuantee Pac even fights again moron.

Being "active" isn't a subjective thing. Manny Pacquiao has fought within the past four months. He has plans to have another fight within the next eight months. That makes him active. Just facts. You can call him retired once he's retired. Not before. Who is this A.K. chump? Can someone either back me up on this or give me the low down on who this fool is? Seems to be more of them popping up lately. Good point and I agree. I do consider him active, too, albeit a fringe contender.

Canelo. I do have my reservations about him as well. Pac is doing a great job ruining his legacy.

Are you? It’s his going out fight it’s not Crawford or anyone relevant, Horn is a paper champ. Same thing is happening with cotto that is not a active fighter that’s a semi retired fighter you might as well put Floyd’s resume up to since he fought 3 months ago... Being "active" isn't a subjective thing. Manny Pacquiao has fought within the past four months. He has plans to have another fight within the next eight months. That makes him active. Just facts. You can call him retired once he's retired. Not before. Who is this A.K. chump? Can someone either back me up on this or give me the low down on who this fool is? Seems to be more of them popping up lately.

Erm. He fought four months ago. He's talked of plans to fight in 2018. Are you retarded? Are you? It’s his going out fight it’s not Crawford or anyone relevant, Horn is a paper champ. Same thing is happening with cotto that is not a active fighter that’s a semi retired fighter you might as well put Floyd’s resume up too since he fought 3 months ago...

Who still considers Pac active?? He’s on the verge of his last fight or never again same with cotto and all those lesser wins you named are fillers everyone has.. no one has to mention them.. Erm. He fought four months ago. He's talked of plans to fight in 2018. Are you retarded?

Excluding Pacquiao or any other old legend I'd say: Canelo- lara, trout, cotto, smith, Chavez jr, rhodes, Mosley, Khan, Kirkland, angulo, cintron Or Danny garcia- matthysse, Khan, Peterson, guerrero, Herrera, Judah, Morales x2, holt, malignaggi agreed...........

Manny is still labeled active....so......

Manny Pacquiao Major Wins/Draws Marco Antonio Barrera x2 Tim Bradley x2 Miguel Cotto Oscar De La Hoya Ricky Hatton Oscar Larios Antonio Margarito Juan Manuel Marquez x3 Erik Morales x2 Shane Mosley Jorge Solis Lesser Wins/Draws (all World Champions) Chris Algieri Joshua Clottey David Diaz Jorge Eliecer Julio Lehlo Ledwaba Brandon Rios Agapito Sanchez Chatchai Sasakul Jessie Vargas Only counting Wins and Draws. Who still considers Pac active?? He’s on the verge of his last fight or never again same with cotto and all those lesser wins you named are fillers everyone has.. no one has to mention them..

Manny Pacquiao Major Wins/Draws Marco Antonio Barrera x2 Tim Bradley x2 Miguel Cotto Oscar De La Hoya Ricky Hatton Oscar Larios Antonio Margarito Juan Manuel Marquez x3 Erik Morales x2 Shane Mosley Jorge Solis Lesser Wins/Draws (all World Champions) Chris Algieri Joshua Clottey David Diaz Jorge Eliecer Julio Lehlo Ledwaba Brandon Rios Agapito Sanchez Chatchai Sasakul Jessie Vargas Only counting Wins and Draws.

Excluding Pacquiao or any other old legend I'd say: Canelo- lara, trout, cotto, smith, Chavez jr, rhodes, Mosley, Khan, Kirkland, angulo, cintron Or Danny garcia- matthysse, Khan, Peterson, guerrero, Herrera, Judah, Morales x2, holt, malignaggi

If Lemieux beats Saunders it’s easily golovkin for easily handling the ginger and pulling out a narrow one vs Jacobs

Good question maybe Canelo.

Terrence Crawford, undisputed and lineal champion at 140, twice fought the #2 guy there, and lineal/wbo champion at 135. He has so much thrust he's going to be equally great at welterweight. This is going to be controversial, but Kovalev can be argued has the best resume since he was unified and could have gotten the nod against Ward. That second fight was marred with controversy. But I'll have to declare Crawford's resume the best.