Takam better doe

yes and yes. Exactly.takam would probably be leading on the scorecards in the 10

Like I thought... you're an idiot. You got red K because you referred to Joshua as "my boy". I wasn't "riled", you just don't disrespect other posters by accusing them of bias. But.. you're an idiot, so... Oh, I accused you of bias because I implied that you're a Joshua fan, calling him your boy? Man, you're stupid and easily triggered. Now, youre calling me names? Go call them Muslims taking over your country names, since you're so fuçking brave. Oh, that's right. They're not on the internet, they're in real life. Go brush your fuçking teeth

Based on what exactly? Just watching their separate fights.

All I can say from my personal opinion is that Takam is better than Stiverne. Based on what exactly?

How long would Takam have lasted against Wilder? Would Takam have been standing in the 10th? How long would Stiverne have lasted with AJ? Would Joshua been able to dispatch Bermaine in the 1st? He's better than Stiverne. Wilders faced no one with that movement before. Spzilla had similar movement to Takam and he was beating Wilder before the KO. Who knows? Lets just see the main event!

No, I'm saying that the entire concept of triangular logic is ludicrous, and proved it by taking a different comparison between the two and inverting your conclusion. You "proved" that Wilder > AJ by highlighting a spectacular last performance by Wilder against a largely dreadful last performance by AJ. But I just created completely the opposite impression by using another example (some would say more relevant, but that's beside the point) of triangular logic. This kind of stuff can be twisted to mean whatever the person wants it to mean, and we can no more decide how AJ would do against Wilder based on the Takam performance (though AJ doesn't seem great with movement) than we can by looking at how Wilder did against Molina. No need to explain anything. I got you so worked up you red Ked me. You said all you need to say with that. Further, I don't need to prove Wilder is better than AJ. AJ does it for me every time he talks about "maybe 2018 or 2019" and "please fight Whyte first". He speaks volumes with those words. Your boy is scared of the real champ

No, that's clearly NOT what I'm saying, but I appreciate your cognitive skills are limited, so I'll give you a pass. Then what are you saying? Isn't using a third party to compare two other triangle theory by definition? "AJ did better against Molina than Wilder did, therefore AJ is better than Wilder." Is that not what you're saying?

Good thing Bermaine had that 10lbs of braids securing his head down or his sh it would have landed in someone's lap, lol. And I agree with Wilder being able to adapt better. He seems like a more natural fighter, whereas Joshua seems like a more textbook boxer. Lol lol lol...

Takam's head might've landed in the 4th row. That type of style doesn't bode well against Wilder. It did him good against AJ because AJ doesn't have technique when you box him. AJ knows how to throw punches, but not when a guy is using defense. He's ordinary. Wilder will club you with straight and wide punches. He can adapt to a fighters style, Joshua can't. Good thing Bermaine had that 10lbs of braids securing his head down or his sh it would have landed in someone's lap, lol. And I agree with Wilder being able to adapt better. He seems like a more natural fighter, whereas Joshua seems like a more textbook boxer.

I appreciate that 90% of all boxing discussion in NSB is based around triangular logic (the other 10% based around who's the "biggest hater" who "knows nuthen bout boxing") but why do you need to use this triangular logic when both men have already fought a common opponent? Eric Molina. How did that comparison look for Wilder? So basically you're saying you'd rather use different triangular logic, because the triangular logic I'm using doesn't look as good for your boy. Got it

Who is better Kubrat Pulev or Dominic Breazeale? ^^ Those are the next fight for each champion Pulev is better than brezeale in my opinion. He was an excellent amateur and has only lost to klitschko. I would say that brezeale has the better chin of the two though.

What makes Takam beter than Stiverne when Stiverne has beaten better comp and won the WBC title? Keyword: Beaten

How long would Takam have lasted against Wilder? Would Takam have been standing in the 10th? How long would Stiverne have lasted with AJ? Would Joshua been able to dispatch Bermaine in the 1st? Takam's head might've landed in the 4th row. That type of style doesn't bode well against Wilder. It did him good against AJ because AJ doesn't have technique when you box him. AJ knows how to throw punches, but not when a guy is using defense. He's ordinary. Wilder will club you with straight and wide punches. He can adapt to a fighters style, Joshua can't.

Takam is better than stiverne rn but i dont expect Takam to go that many rounds with Deontay as he did with AJ

Takam would have the same success against Wilder as he did against Joshua. Wilder would probably use his jab more but Takam is very durable and can box.

You're using hypotheticals as if you already know. Doe No. Simply trying to have a conversation. No different than "How long would Wilder last against Tyson?" Or "would GGG beat Hagler?" Or "Would Ward have beat prime Roy?" Or any of the other myriad of hypothetical matchup that get discussed here. Maybe you don't like the probable answer and that's why you're trying to insult me.

It's not even close. Takam is much better with his boxing skills and slickness. Takam would have gone more rounds like Szpilka did. Stiverne looked just gross overall last night.

Who is better Kubrat Pulev or Dominic Breazeale? ^^ Those are the next fight for each champion Hope not. But Pulev, obviously.

Who is better Kubrat Pulev or Dominic Breazeale? ^^ Those are the next fight for each champion

Wilder tko 6 on Takam