Why aren't GBP/Canelo getting more backlash regarding Byrd's scorecard?

Firstly there was a backlash at her, secondly where is the proof that they paid her off? This would not be the first controversial scorecard in boxing and it wouldn’t be the last.

If Golovkin won so clearly why aren't fans like you crying about TrellaThey are. The 7th round was clearly won by GGG and even Byrd gave it to him. So Trella scoring it for Canelo looks shady as fcuk. To me, Byrd is just incompetent. Her stupid score became a distraction.

Yea there is something to be said for subtly in your corruption if you are doing some corrupt sh^t lol. You would think someone doing some f#cked up sh^t wouldn't wanna make it such a obvious blatant scoring for the guy their working for. So that's also something making the fault of this being about Byrd and not some darker level of deceit going on. Folks act like press row is infallible. Sometimes, for whatever reason, they get it wrong too. Now, if you have a buch of guys that have spent the last 2 or 3 years talking about how great Triple G is and how much Canelo was avoiding the fight for so long, of course they might score for stuff they really have no business scoring for. A guy coming forward and landing a sometimey jab and a very few clean powershots shouldn't be given 8 rounds by any competent judge if he is also eating cleaner sharper powershots almost every round.

It's because you have a huge anti-ggg bias. Virgil Hunter, Ward's trainer had it 8-4 GGG. Can he be biased towards GGG? I think a lot of folks who originally scored it wide got a chance to see it again and scored it closer. Again, I didn't see 5 rounds I thought Golovkin won. That isn't an anti-GGG bias, I just cant justify it based on the 4 scoring criteria.

Then how can he be selected for this fight?Byrd is a she and not a he. No idea how but she should retire

She went to dinner with Oscar then night prior to fight, in any other sport that's called tampering with serious fines imposed. Source? Link?

This was corruption. This was not a mistake. They paid her to make Canelo win but she was so dumb she made it too obvious. If she scored the fight Canelo 7-5 some assh0les would repeat that phrase "close fight that could've gone either way" but luckily her corruption was to obvious and people know GGG won. Now the boxing world attacked her a lot but not Oscar so much. This is like the 5th time that Canelo receives a completely strange scorecard on his favour. Says who? Talk to the NEVADA State Athletic Commission. If what you're claiming is true, then the corruption is with the ATHLETIC COMMISSION(S). Vote in this thread... Poll: Corruption or Incompetence? What needs to happen, realistically? Credit to Michael Montero putting Bob Bennet on the spot...

If Golovkin won so clearly why aren't fans like you crying about Trella? Because you know it was a close either way fight. :dunce: I know Golovkin won, every reputable analyst and boxer had him winning too. I won't discuss this anymore with you, you have your butt very open and red. You're still wiping the cum out of it.

I heard that this blind witch screws up MMA scores too.

So you admit people are only crying robbery because Byrd is a bad judge? :lol1: I won't discuss with retarded people like you. Not even god knows what twisted argument you're trying to make. I had Golovkin winning the fight. If I’m not mistaken, I had it 116-112. I had Golovkin winning the fight. I thought Alvarez fought well but I thought he fought in spurts. Virgil Hunter.

Byrd is just a shizity judge and has a history in both boxing and ufc of being incompetent about 50% of the time Then how can he be selected for this fight?

I just don't know if this is corruption as much as it is either bad judging, bad eyesight, alcohol, or someone influenced by a promoter treating her with perks. A judge that was truly paid off- and obviously trying to conceal that fact- would have a much closer scorecard. And it would be that close scorecard that was outrageously off. Here, you had a close fight that could be seen either way. I had it 7-5 Canelo and frankly I still can't find more than 5 rounds to give to Golovkin after several viewings. But, I get that others saw it close the other way and had it a draw or 7-5 GGG. I think more than that (ie any 8-4 card or higher) and there is something going on that has nothing to do with what actually happened. It's because you have a huge anti-ggg bias. Virgil Hunter, Ward's trainer had it 8-4 GGG. Can he be biased towards GGG? I had Golovkin winning the fight. If I’m not mistaken, I had it 116-112. I thought Alvarez fought well but I thought he fought in spurts. I thought Golovkin pretty much made the fight.

Cuz ultimately saying Oscar paid off a judge is a bridge too far for most people. And I think Byrd has shown a sketchy enough history that her being corrupt doesn't fit occums razor version of what most likely happened. Although I think it is a thought in peoples mind that there is a lot of sketchiness with Canelo & one judge being highly favoring him in many of his fights which is odd if nothing else more dark is going on. I'd love for there to be some more evidence that promoters are paying off or having some sort of quid pro quo thing with judges doe, but I haven't seen that in this case or most cases (believe there was one case awhile back that had some sh^t like that). You need that sorta evidence to go anywhere real with this sorta stuff doe. Byrd is just a shizity judge and has a history in both boxing and ufc of being incompetent about 50% of the time

I just don't know if this is corruption as much as it is either bad judging, bad eyesight, alcohol, or someone influenced by a promoter treating her with perks. A judge that was truly paid off- and obviously trying to conceal that fact- would have a much closer scorecard. And it would be that close scorecard that was outrageously off. Here, you had a close fight that could be seen either way. I had it 7-5 Canelo and frankly I still can't find more than 5 rounds to give to Golovkin after several viewings. But, I get that others saw it close the other way and had it a draw or 7-5 GGG. I think more than that (ie any 8-4 card or higher) and there is something going on that has nothing to do with what actually happened.

The Byrd scorecard overall just signaled that there was some definite foul play. At least for me, I feel as if a Draw is giving Canelo a pat on the back for not getting knocked out. The 118-110 card was atrocious but I'd also argue 115-113 for Canelo is a borderline **** card too. I saw the fight like 98% of the public (8-4 / 7-5 GGG) in a fight that wasn't very hard to score at all and we've seen several fights just like this without having any bias towards or against either guy (which is really what this all boils down to). GGG vs Jacobs BY FAR is a greater case for a draw or even a 1 point swing for Jacobs. GGG beat Canelo in a moderately competitive fight.

On second thought violence and vandalism might not be a good idea.

The answer to your question is in your post. This is like the 5th time that Canelo receives a completely strange scorecard on his favour. Every Canelo fight that goes the distance and is not a complete blowout in his favor has at least one highly questionable scorecard. Boxing fans are used to it.

Multiple people saw them togather in vegas including teddy atlas, she didn't get suspended for no reason.. Oscar should be punished too but the sport is twisted in politics. would love to see a link

Multiple people saw them togather in vegas including teddy atlas, she didn't get suspended for no reason.. Oscar should be punished too but the sport is twisted in politics. You got links?

where did you read that? Multiple people saw them togather in vegas including teddy atlas, she didn't get suspended for no reason.. Oscar should be punished too but the sport is twisted in politics.