You may be right, but Nas from the 90's would have given them much better fights than the '01 version. Also, I'm a fan of Marquez, but I'm pretty sure Marquez was offered a fight with Nas in '99 or '00 and turned it down.
Just worlds apart in comp level. Look at their resumes, Barrera easily fought way more top level guys. That was Hamed's only real big test and he got walked on.
Wish that fight would have been a couple of years earlier. As people have said, Hamed wasn't taking anything seriously then, he spent the whole camp just losing weight and his hands were shot to bits by then.
They're things that are his own fault though except the hands, so he deserves the loss and can't take anything away from Barrera, he did what he had to.
If Naz was at his best, it would be a very different story i think. Either way, Naseem still doesn't always get the credit he deserves. He was very good and beat some good fighters, his only loss being a UD to Barrera which is hardly anything to be ashamed of.
Nas did achieve a lot in his career - WBC, WBO and IBF champion, should have had WBA as well, I don't know how many world title fight wins off hand, one defeat on points to a hall of famer, and that's not to even mention all the entertainment and excitement he brought to boxing. And professional boxing is ultimately about entertainment for paying customer's, as well as being a sport.
He is definitely one of Britain's best ever fighters. He's now deservedly in the hall of fame (it took a while).
He was a very good fighter. He just wasn't as good as he was always saying he was earlier in his career. I think saying he was gonna be one of the best of all time annoyed some of the media and fans, especially in America, when he clearly wasn't. I think he did initially believe it, but by the time he fought Barerra he had realized that wasn't the case, and had lost some of his confidence. Barrera was the best opponent he faced, and he he couldn't get away with glossing over his weaknesses, like he could against lesser fighters.
Wish that fight would have been a couple of years earlier. As people have said, Hamed wasn't taking anything seriously then, he spent the whole camp just losing weight and his hands were shot to bits by then.
They're things that are his own fault though except the hands, so he deserves the loss and can't take anything away from Barrera, he did what he had to.
If Naz was at his best, it would be a very different story i think. Either way, Naseem still doesn't always get the credit he deserves. He was very good and beat some good fighters, his only loss being a UD to Barrera which is hardly anything to be ashamed of.
No version of Hamed ever beats Barrera. Barrera had mad boxing skill and wasn't at all intimidated by Hamed or anyone for that matter. Hamed actually seemed intimidated by Barreras aggressiveness during the fight.
this. MAB was determined like never before that night. he put on a show that night.
There's a good documentary about that fight called Little Prince, Big Fight. It shows pretty much why Naz lost. He was boasting about training in the lap of luxury while Barrera was training diligently at high altitude. Naz had pretty much lost passion for boxing at that point. Even the Mexican sparring partners for that camp were causing him all sorts of problems and they apparently went and reported everything they saw in the camp directly to Barrera himself. A prime Naz was a much better fighter than the one that fought Barrera. That version would lose to a lot of fighters. His dedication was so low that Emanuel Steward left him after the Barrera fight and they were squabbling all through the camp.. here's what he had to say:
Speaking to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper, he said: "I've decided that I don't want to work with Naseem anymore.
"It's not effective, it's a waste of time and money for everyone. The way he is, I don't think he will fulfil his talent.
"I've seen mistakes being made (but) if you try to make changes they fall on deaf ears. To have my knowledge and not use it is a waste."
Steward believes Hamed is too wrapped up in his own fame, fortune and ego to accept the advice he needs to hear.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/1315855.stm
I think Hamed knew he wasn't the same fighter he used to be, had lost his hunger, and was up against someone who wasn't intimidated by his power. It was like he knew the writing was on the wall from early in the fight, Barerra had his number and he couldn't beat him. Reminds me a bit of Tyson vs Holyfield.
No version of Hamed ever beats Barrera. Barrera had mad boxing skill and wasn't at all intimidated by Hamed or anyone for that matter. Hamed actually seemed intimidated by Barreras aggressiveness during the fight.
Hamed definitely wasn't the same fighter as he was in the mid 90's - however I'm still inclined to think in retrospect that Barerra that night would have the number of any version of Hamed.
I used to be a massive Nas fan, he was exciting and spectacular at his best, but as I learnt more about boxing, I realized he did have technical flaws which could be exploited (providing someone was good enough AND could stand up to his power). Barrera was good enough and tough enough that night. He had the right game plan, drew the leads and counter punched him perfectly, and made him miss with his wild swings and exploited his poor balance.
Nas was at his best 95 - '98 though.
If Hamed had a proper camp and taken barrera more seriously then he would have beaten Barrera and cemented his legacy as the greatest Featherweight of all time. I remember crying like a little ***** from about the 9th till the scores were read out and my Dad going off his nut with me