Nah this is too much man. I'm reading "Mirko Troll Cop" saying he heard Jacobs say Broner won last night.
No wonder he also felt he beat Golovkin.
Shameless from Jacobs.
How could anybody be THAT biased though? If Broner was my own family, i'd still know he lost pretty much every round.
I know scoring is subjective but it's not even like there was many close rounds apart from one or two. You really can't make a case for Broner winning more than 2 or 3 rounds and even that is being generous.
It was about as one sided as you will see in terms of a fight going the distance.
Did anyone even watch the video?
He said "I'm biased, I was going for Broner which is why I had him up".
Nothing more to see here
Yeah, wich is stupid as we said.
This guy is living off a good fight vs GGG and shouldn't be commentating with such retarted statements.
Boxers don't automatically make good judges. Also he even says in the video he is biased because he was rooting for Broner .
My thoughts, exactly. I can't understand how someone who boxes can be so clueless about scoring a fight. And bias is no excuse. If that was a close fight, I would agree; but even a poor judge can see it wasn't even close.
Did anyone even watch the video?
He said "I'm biased, I was going for Broner which is why I had him up".
Nothing more to see here
Larry, Stax and Brush are all biased, and non of them had Broner winning.
Did anyone even watch the video?
He said "I'm biased, I was going for Broner which is why I had him up".
Nothing more to see here
Yes true. But that is exactly why I never trust razor thin 115-113 scorecards from biased guys backing up their fighter.
More often or not they are not honest and bend the reality of the fight to suit their taste.
To me personally, that was a one sided beating if I never saw one. Garcia clearly won the fight. It wasn't even close or controversial. As far as Jacobs is concerned, I'm willing to cut him some slack.
He was judging the fight emotionally and not empirically. He's clearly a fan of Adrien's and wanted him to win and was rooting for him to win. That's why he came up with such a subjective and partial conclusion.
It's called denial.
LOL I just looked that up myself & posted it in the MTC thread cuz it sounded nutso to me.
For full disclosure he does outright say he might be biased cuz he wanted Broner to win or picked him or whatever, but even when I want someone to win or have picked them I don't think I've ever had them winning in a fight so seemingly easy to score + having one way action like this fight was.
With all the commentary Jacobs does these days idk that you can ever have this cat doing a scorecard off of that wacky stance without insuring it gets joked about. No one being reasonable shoulda had Broner winning that fight or I'd even argue winning more than 4 rounds which I thought was a very favorable take for Broner by a judge or two last night with the 8-4 scorecards (I gave Broner 2 rounds). If you gave Broner 5 rounds or more last night & don't own a AB shirt or got his Youtube channel bookmarked YDKSAB cuz being biased I can at least understand, but if you aren't biased wtf were you seeing to think that fight was close?
Anyone who gave Broner more than 2 maybe 3 is biased. He didn't win that much.
Well.. I always thought Jacobs was a smart guy.. but now I just can't see it... It's either ur dumb as a rock or u just trolling.. wich one is it Jacobs?