Spence was lost. Throwing air the whole fight. Slow plodding feet couldn't catch the khazakh who was toying with spence. Brook's feet will be a nightmare for spence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQFmIYgecvw&t=749s
Spence was lost. Throwing air the whole fight. Slow plodding feet couldn't catch the khazakh who was toying with spence. Brook's feet will be a nightmare for spence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQFmIYgecvw&t=749s
That was a good scrap between both of them, that kid was quick, threw combos & had good feet. Do you really think that kid can beat Errol now?? Doubt that.
How are you betting?
I have to be dead honest. I have not studied Spence, felt like I wanted to kick up the hells and enjoy a good fight liking both men.
But looking at it on paper, it's clear that there are some high expectations with regard to Spence. I feel that this is somewhat unproven - Though I do believe that Spence could be goods, I don't necessarily want to invest into speculation. I'm definitely looking the odds for Brook here, he proved he can spoil, box and move real good against Porter and others and I am led to believe that he showed a very durable chin against GGG. Whatever punchingpower Spence is packing, I don't see the fight ending with a KO, yet.
I think it will go to points and if that happens I could easily see the champion and hometurf fighter take it on points. That would be the safe bet with a pretty equaty around 2½ times the money back. If your guy is Spence, and you've seen something I haven't I'd go for him on points or a late KO. (When betting on rounds you should consider betting on the particular round and then maybe place around 3-5 bets on those rounds - If you catch one of them, it'll be worth the bet.)
The odds are pretty ridiculess in my opinion. It should be a 50 / 50 fight, but again, I haven't gone out of my way to study Errol Spence yet.
Kell Brook looks like a superb boxer, in my opinion. Honestly it could happen, because Spence is still untested. But then again, Spence could be a super slick boxer himself. Looking forward to the fight, with these odds. I'm gonna look to earn some cash. Almost can't lose with these odds. Ofcourse if you need a betting advice, come to me. Last 3 bets:
Bellew KO Haye 11th. - 51 times money back.
Thurman over Garcia points - 2-3 times money back.
AJ vs. WK 11th - 17 times money back.
How are you betting?
Kell Brook looks like a superb boxer, in my opinion. Honestly it could happen, because Spence is still untested. But then again, Spence could be a super slick boxer himself. Looking forward to the fight, with these odds. I'm gonna look to earn some cash. Almost can't lose with these odds. Ofcourse if you need a betting advice, come to me. Last 3 bets:
Bellew KO Haye 11th. - 51 times money back.
Thurman over Garcia points - 2-3 times money back.
AJ vs. WK 11th - 17 times money back.
Damn bro. You had to go back 6 years to find a video to support your claim? Lol. A fighter can't improve and get better as their body matures and they gain more experience with better training?
Very few fighters in the history of the sport would be able to move like that over the course of 12 rounds, a big reason why a lot of those decorated amateurs don't turn pro.
Spence was lost. Throwing air the whole fight. Slow plodding feet couldn't catch the khazakh who was toying with spence. Brook's feet will be a nightmare for spence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQFmIYgecvw&t=749s
... That's the idea! :) (in order to sum up)...
That's one of the best amateurs of recent years, who was in his prime, while Spence was like 20/21. A lot has changed since 2011. Not to mention Brook fights nothing like Sapiev, he's nowhere near that mobile.
I started boxrec'ing shit, and this Serik dude beat somebody in the amateur's by the name of.....
Gennady Kovalev.:lol1:
Wow lol imagine if there was a fighter like that!
Had the power, jab, ring IQ, athleticism of Kovalev and the stamina, chin, and footwork of Golovkin!
Scary thought there
I think Spence will win. Brook will be fighting the 2017 Spence, not the 2011 Spence. Did Brook fight as well in 2011 as he does now? Did Brook win all his amateur fights? Didn't Brook have some very difficult pro fights with guys who were not as good as Spence?
Sapiev had 5 times the experience of a very young Spence and is one of the best amateurs maybe even ever, practically impossible to look good against.
He had impeccable footwork and a seriously awkward jittery style to deal with. Absolutely made for the amateurs where Spence even then was more suited to the pro's and hadn't yey found his identity, he was just a kid I don't think you can take much if anything from this.