Truth lol....
Never logical around here. Par for the course! :lol1:
Lol I've gotten over that sh*t by now. I don't pay no mind to those people anymore.
Kell Brook is going to win and myself and several other non-biased posters are going to remind these fat Yank posters at every opportunity how much mad ish they talked in the build up. In 4-5 years they'll be staying, "You still going on about that Brook-Spence fight?"
so when did YOU decide YOU were non biased? Spence is flat out the better fighter and that will become very clear on fight night.
Brook would be exposed as what exactly? He's already proven he's a good fighter and beat the brakes off Porter. So if Spence wins, he beat a really good fighter. Can't it just be left as that?
While Brook certainly deserved to win, your idea of "beat the brakes off Porter" and mine are worlds apart.
Both guys are very skilled but I think Spence's skills are being overlooked. I know he's knocking boys out, but these are lower level guys, he's taking chances to land harder, cleaner shots to get them out of there ASAP. When you're fighting a top level guy like Brook, obviously you're a lot more cautious because every mistake could be your last one. I expect to see Spence's skills on full display in a few weeks, he's a very complete fighter and is comfortable at all ranges.
The difference in this fight will be how good Spence is in the pocket compared to Kell, I don't think Kell gonna be able to smother and clinch Spence, The Truth is a very good judge of distance and will only get close when he's on the attack, if Kell tries to tie him up, Spence is going to be ripping to that body. He's much bigger than Shawn and more technically polished, more accurate and hits harder.
I think the early rounds will be very close but eventually Spence will start taking over, once he settles in, gets used to the crowd, gets a good gauge of Brook's gameplan, he will separate himself to win by clear UD or late stoppage.
Either way, I'm counting down the days for this one. Will be supporting Special K, but I think Spence really is 'The Truth'.
I am picking Spence but it doesn't mean Kell is going to be "exposed". He's proven that hes a very good fighter. You guys are crazy with your "exposed" and "hypejob" sh*t.
Algeri took shots from Pacman and Provotnikov that would put Brook in a Coma.
Algeri isn't the kind to hula dance with something like Shenchenko.
No. Just no.
To wrestle means he has to get in close.
Spence is always in position to punch....remember Spence's body attack.
... Spence will want to get in mid-range close... and in case he is able to dodge Brook's stiff jab (which I doubt), the he would get immediately clinched... That what Brook does...
Algeri is better than Carson Jones and beat better fighters.
Yeah he probably is.
But he is definitely smaller and can't hold a shot as well.
I'm just saying Carson Jones isn't bad and on that day he was very good. And that's not scratching around for excuses for Kell because he came up with a few for himself.
I'd say Kell Brook is possibly my favourite active fighter if I had to have one. But in all honesty I don't care that much if he loses I just like his style and his technique and see him as someone who will likely always be in good fights.
Jones had him busted up in the rematch...the fight was stopped by the ref...UK style...it was hardly a destruction.
Spence is too good to be dragged around by the likes of Carson Jones.
I don't think Carson is a bad fighter though. Sometimes you have to take a look at fighter on a given day and give them credit. He fought out of his skin in that first fight in a career performance albeit he still lost.
Never really understood Jones being used as a stick to beat Brook with. Do fans really want to see fights in which fighter rolls over fighter b indefinitely and face no adversity. You must have absolutely loved boxing in 2016?
Tbh, unless Errol Spence is your actual son ffs, surely you want him to have a gut check and pass it.
When an underdog like Jones turns up a busts up the favourite and gives it a go you thank the boxing Gods.
I think Brook wins because he is a superior boxer than Spence.. But if Spence wins then fair play to him..
Getting beat by a better fighter than you isn't getting exposed.. Brook can still win against other WW like Danny, Porter, Berto but against Thurman he might fall short..
Neither gets exposed if they lose, both hit pretty hard and aren't afraid to get stuck in. I think whoever wins, if they win clearly, then they're a top 3 welter.
Brook would be exposed as what exactly? He's already proven he's a good fighter and beat the brakes off Porter. So if Spence wins, he beat a really good fighter. Can't it just be left as that?
That's not how things are done here at NSB. Lol
Brook would be exposed as what exactly? He's already proven he's a good fighter and beat the brakes off Porter. So if Spence wins, he beat a really good fighter. Can't it just be left as that?
Really he beat the "brakes" off porter lmaoo he was back peddling the whole fight trying to survive.