Gamboa loss not only exposes Gamboa but also Crawford

Arum was dumb for not making Pac/Crawford. Pac would school him Surely Arum wants Crawford to win?

It's sad to say, but Crawford had a hard time with a little guy like Gamboa whereas a guy we've never heard of until 12 or so hours ago with 12 losses on his resume did a much better job on Gamboa than Crawford did. I think It's only fair to say since this is the way things go, Crawford was badly exposed and a lot of doubt remains around how good he really is because he hasn't honestly fought anyone good and he will continue that trend remaining at 140lbs. And for all the doubters please remember Gamboa took this big L to Robinson Castellanos when he was active, at least we can excuse Gamboa on the Crawford fight because he had a year and 3 months absence from the sport, to be honest... I think this active version of Gamboa would have schooled Crawford. So there you have it Gamboa and Crawford both EXPOSED on the same day, damn that must hurt. Real Talk! :boxing::boxing: Quit Playing. You don't believe that yourself.

I think every undefeated fighter is a bit overrated by definition. It's the job of everyone around them, promoter alike to over hype them. I would say outlandish stuff all day to get fighters and fans to read it or view it. It sells fights. When people say a guy is overrated, I say "yeah, his promoters basically create his rating" it's all part of the game. This boxing business rational can be applied to any product, or service in our market place as well. How many times have you bought a product or service and been like "what was this hype all about". We live in smoke and mirror type society, nothing is EVER as it seems to be. The point is the new flavour of the month in boxing is by saying every fighter that they aren't big fans of has been exposed by not losing, but some other means. You know what I said was outlandish, but this kind of **** gets printed and posted out all the damn time, we have all these little Youtube channels selling that narrative as well.

I've been saying this all along. Crawford has one of the worst resumes of a p4p guy. Only decent opponent he beat was postol. Gamboa was coming up 2 weight classes was 6 inches shorter was outweighed by 25 lbs and had 6-7 inches less in reach. Yet, he was outboxing crawford for the first couple of rds. When he beat gamboa FLO-MO NATION jumped up in joy and said the win puts crawford in the p4p list. JUST LOLLLLLLLLLL. Now gamboa loses to a guy with 11 losses. Plus Gamboa had a year and a quarter lay-off, It was a troll/joke thread but a lot of what I said is true and it doesn't make Crawford look that good.

LMAO I don't see how either guy gets "exposed" bc gamboa lost.. The dude is 35 years old, chinny, and his reflexes are starting to slip, and he is undersized at 135.. Gamboa kinda reminds me of roy jones 15 years ago. Once the reflexes and explosive "twitch" started to fade with age, they became more vulnerable in fights.. Castallanos basically did what glen johnson did to roy- get up in his arse and make it a rough fight. When you have always fought naturally with hands down, but then reflexes fade and not use to protecting yourself in traditional ways, so you end up just getting tagged repeatedly..

I was more joking with the thread, yeah. He is obviously good just not P4P top 3 yet. I think every undefeated fighter is a bit overrated by definition. It's the job of everyone around them, promoter alike to over hype them. I would say outlandish stuff all day to get fighters and fans to read it or view it. It sells fights. When people say a guy is overrated, I say "yeah, his promoters basically create his rating" it's all part of the game. This boxing business rational can be applied to any product, or service in our market place as well. How many times have you bought a product or service and been like "what was this hype all about". We live in smoke and mirror type society, nothing is EVER as it seems to be.

off topic question. where is that gif of them fine ass ladies on the beach from?? Gif https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i26rePceQLE Bria Myles https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Bria+Myles

Put some actual thought into the next thread you create.

Crawford has done anything yet , and Gambao was stupid for wasting all those year out of the sport off topic question. where is that gif of them fine ass ladies on the beach from??

Even if we ignore the fact that it's 3 years later and Gamboa has stayed inactive comparing how great a fighter is because of the way he beat or fought common opponents doesn't work. Lucas Matthyssee destroyed Peterson in three rounds while Danny Garcia had a tough fight with Peterson. Yet when Garcia fought Lucas, Garcia won by a good margin.

No way, it all makes complete sense. Pac got double exposed when Marquez killed him, then ended up getting schooled in his next fight. And, Golovkin got exposed when 90% of his former opponents went on to failure. And, Loma got exposed because the guy who beat him went on to win only 1 of his next 4 fights. Anyhow, I think that's how we play this game. I'm having a good laugh seeing how people agree as well as seeing others even bothering to explain anything to TS.

ive told people this for a while, theres a lot more question marks against crawford than people think. Yeah, what questions are those, how he's dominated every single boxer he's ever faced?

It's sad to say, but Crawford had a hard time with a little guy like Gamboa whereas a guy we've never heard of until 12 or so hours ago with 12 losses on his resume did a much better job on Gamboa than Crawford did. I think It's only fair to say since this is the way things go, Crawford was badly exposed and a lot of doubt remains around how good he really is because he hasn't honestly fought anyone good and he will continue that trend remaining at 140lbs. And for all the doubters please remember Gamboa took this big L to Robinson Castellanos when he was active, at least we can excuse Gamboa on the Crawford fight because he had a year and 3 months absence from the sport, to be honest... I think this active version of Gamboa would have schooled Crawford. So there you have it Gamboa and Crawford both EXPOSED on the same day, damn that must hurt. Real Talk! :boxing::boxing: Hahahahaha..... dropped him 4 times and won by KO = EXPOSED LOLOLOL, only on NSB folks!

It's sad to say, but Crawford had a hard time with a little guy like Gamboa whereas a guy we've never heard of until 12 or so hours ago with 12 losses on his resume did a much better job on Gamboa than Crawford did. I think It's only fair to say since this is the way things go, Crawford was badly exposed and a lot of doubt remains around how good he really is because he hasn't honestly fought anyone good and he will continue that trend remaining at 140lbs. And for all the doubters please remember Gamboa took this big L to Robinson Castellanos when he was active, at least we can excuse Gamboa on the Crawford fight because he had a year and 3 months absence from the sport, to be honest... I think this active version of Gamboa would have schooled Crawford. So there you have it Gamboa and Crawford both EXPOSED on the same day, damn that must hurt. Real Talk! :boxing::boxing: This is why I say Lomachenko beats anyone from 140 down including Middleweight Crawford

Crawford fought Gamboa 3 years ago when Gamboa was undefeated and a much better fighter than he is today. Gamboa has become a completely washed up fighter in those 3 years. The Gamboa of today is just a washed up shell of the Gamboa who fought Crawford so Crawford was not exposed by Gamboa's last loss. Crawford went on to easily beat Postol and that was a much more important and impressive win than his win over Gamboa. Completely agree with this. Crawford is out there proving that he is one of the best boxers out there and with a win over Diaz and possibly Indongo down the line, it will lead to him finally moving up to 147

Man, I'm the first poster to say that Gamboa and Postol wins are overrated in Crawford's resume, (not saying that Bud is overrated though, he's the real deal) but let's be real,that version of Gamboa was amazing boxer. At some point, some people were saying Gamboa is more talented than Rigo. You can't compare current washed up version of Gamboa with that monster who gave Crawford hell of a fight.

It's sad to say, but Crawford had a hard time with a little guy like Gamboa whereas a guy we've never heard of until 12 or so hours ago with 12 losses on his resume did a much better job on Gamboa than Crawford did. I think It's only fair to say since this is the way things go, Crawford was badly exposed and a lot of doubt remains around how good he really is because he hasn't honestly fought anyone good and he will continue that trend remaining at 140lbs. And for all the doubters please remember Gamboa took this big L to Robinson Castellanos when he was active, at least we can excuse Gamboa on the Crawford fight because he had a year and 3 months absence from the sport, to be honest... I think this active version of Gamboa would have schooled Crawford. So there you have it Gamboa and Crawford both EXPOSED on the same day, damn that must hurt. Real Talk! :boxing::boxing: I've been saying this all along. Crawford has one of the worst resumes of a p4p guy. Only decent opponent he beat was postol. Gamboa was coming up 2 weight classes was 6 inches shorter was outweighed by 25 lbs and had 6-7 inches less in reach. Yet, he was outboxing crawford for the first couple of rds. When he beat gamboa FLO-MO NATION jumped up in joy and said the win puts crawford in the p4p list. JUST LOLLLLLLLLLL. Now gamboa loses to a guy with 11 losses.

Gamboa is not what he used to be.

Crawford has done anything yet , and Gambao was stupid for wasting all those year out of the sport

This thread is as dumb as the "Wladimir got exposed" thread. :pat: No way, it all makes complete sense. Pac got double exposed when Marquez killed him, then ended up getting schooled in his next fight. And, Golovkin got exposed when 90% of his former opponents went on to failure. And, Loma got exposed because the guy who beat him went on to win only 1 of his next 4 fights. Anyhow, I think that's how we play this game.