GGG won but he definitely owes Jacobs a rematch

I think the strategy will be that they try to get the Canelo fight. If Ward wins again, team Ward will probably go after the Golovkin fight because the risk reward will make sense but then team Golovkin will go back to the unification talk because Ward is too high a risk and pursue the Saunders bout if he still holds the belt. Then with Ward still pushing for the Golovkin match team Golovkin will talk about the importance of the Jacobs rematch, that Jacobs earned the rematch. 3 fights out minimum.

Transitional boxing nor Cyberboxing recognizes GGG as lineal champ but lineal title is now vacent and he has to fight Jacobs again to fill it..no one mentioned Ring Nope he has to fight Candela who was the last man to carry that title. He already beat Jacobs, by a very small margin, but that's still a win. You guys act like it was some kinda Chavez vs Pernell stuff. GGG won a close contest but won.

Please stop acting like he dominated..there were no huge scorecards in his favor and Jacobs is still the fighter he has to face to become Lineal since he is the #2 middleweight in the world The rematch would make more money then the 1st fight and Jacobs earned it ESPN 115-112 Golovkin HBO 115-112 Golovkin The Ring Magazine 115-112 Golovkin The Guardian 115-112 Golovkin International Business Times 115-112 Golovkin LA Times 114-113 Golovkin Boxing Scene 114-113 Golovkin Associated Press 114-113 Golovkin CBS 114-114 Telegraph 114-114 Yahoo 114-113 Jacobs Box Nation 114-113 Jacobs USA Today 115-113 Jacobs Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs 15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs the media saw it almost dead even so lets kill this nonsense That fight was a hell of a good competitive fight between 2 true middleweights (wich didn't happen maybe since Taylor vs Hopkins/Pavlik). Any person who don't want to see a rematch is not a boxing fan. A rematch would be good for boxing and the MW division. That being said, I don't think GGG OWES Jacobs anything. He won a close decision, but still won, in the eyes of the judges but ALSO stats like compubox and most boxing fans. GGG gave Jacobs a first chance to fight for the title as a challenger, so he doesn't OWE him a rematch IMO. But that rematch must happen, I'm just saying GGG doesn't have debts regarding DJ.

Jacobs face looked like he got hit by a mac truck. It was a big stage & GGG wanted to put on a show but he was trying too hard for the knockout which made him look more vulnerable than other fights but I still thought he won the fight comfortably, a rematch isn't needed. I hope Canelo is next.

Good fight, I felt Jacobs won. Would like to see a rematch

i expect a rematch, but i dn't expect it right away. golovkin's people are seeing hte end of the road. t heyre' going to look to get canelo in the ring any way they can and cash out. they've milked this thing long enough.

And Jacobs outlanded Pirog 73-43 before the stoppage, somehow you f a g s say Jacobs was losing that fight. As far as compubox goes, I can tell you right now, whomever was pushing that button was full of schit. I lost count how many jabs Jacobs landed that didn't get counted Watch the fight again and only listen to one guy announcing. Manny Stewart. He thought that Jacobs wasn't winning..

Transitional boxing nor Cyberboxing recognizes GGG as lineal champ but lineal title is now vacent and he has to fight Jacobs again to fill it..no one mentioned Ring Transitional boxing doesn't recognize Canelo's lineal title(whatever that means) because Canelo said in an interview he's not a middleweight, but they have no problem ranking Canelo #3 in their middleweight rankings. What kind of ass backward logic is that?

That app has thousands of users. The link from boxingscene you posted has 158 votes with 70 people voting GGG won. So ignore my proof with thousands of users and rely on your boxingscene poll with 158 total users. Your math ain't adding up. Show me the scores from all these forums you claimi had GGG winning. Maxi "Fake News" The app has thousands of users? maybe they are all from America. Who knows. Polls all over the world saw Golovkin winning. I won't lose my time anymore. You racist ****.

I agree a rematch would be good although I thought GGG won be a comfortable margin. The part about having to beat him twice in a row to become lineal champion is nonsense. He already beat him by UD so he is the lineal champ right now even under Ring's stupid rules. Jacobs was number 2 and GGG was number 1 going into the first fight. Ring doesn't rule boxing. GGG has considered the best middleweight in the world for years now. Canelo may have had some claim to being lineal champ but he gave that up when he vacated the his middleweight title rather than fight GGG. GGG is this mythical lineal champion right now, today to anybody with common sense. Two wins over Jacobs isn't needed for this. A rematch would be good on it's own merits but not because of lineal BS. Transitional boxing nor Cyberboxing recognizes GGG as lineal champ but lineal title is now vacent and he has to fight Jacobs again to fill it..no one mentioned Ring

I'm down with a rematch. These are hilarious though: Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs 15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs Seriously, what 'media' outlets are those? You have to be straight up brain damaged to give 115-112 for Danny.

I agree a rematch would be good although I thought GGG won be a comfortable margin. The part about having to beat him twice in a row to become lineal champion is nonsense. He already beat him by UD so he is the lineal champ right now even under Ring's stupid rules. Jacobs was number 2 and GGG was number 1 going into the first fight. Ring doesn't rule boxing. GGG has considered the best middleweight in the world for years now. Canelo may have had some claim to being lineal champ but he gave that up when he vacated the his middleweight title rather than fight GGG. GGG is this mythical lineal champion right now, today to anybody with common sense. Two wins over Jacobs isn't needed for this. A rematch would be good on it's own merits but not because of lineal BS.

Rematch is needed..all the great ones cleared the air when there was doubt That's ridiculous, there's plenty of examples of great fighters not giving a rematch after a close fight. Classifying Golovkin as a great one is also ridiculous, although anyone can see what your angle is here. Trinidad/Oscar, Calzaghe/Hopkins, Marquez/Barerra, Chavez/ Whitaker, Oscar/ Sturm, etc., Bradley/Provodnikov, Alvarez/Lara, Froch/Direll, Garcia/Herrera...examples of good recent fighters who didn't give a rematch.

Yes I agree. Very close fight

Rematch is needed..all the great ones cleared the air when there was doubt

Please stop acting like he dominated..there were no huge scorecards in his favor and Jacobs is still the fighter he has to face to become Lineal since he is the #2 middleweight in the world The rematch would make more money then the 1st fight and Jacobs earned it ESPN 115-112 Golovkin HBO 115-112 Golovkin The Ring Magazine 115-112 Golovkin The Guardian 115-112 Golovkin International Business Times 115-112 Golovkin LA Times 114-113 Golovkin Boxing Scene 114-113 Golovkin Associated Press 114-113 Golovkin CBS 114-114 Telegraph 114-114 Yahoo 114-113 Jacobs Box Nation 114-113 Jacobs USA Today 115-113 Jacobs Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs 15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs the media saw it almost dead even so lets kill this nonsense First canelo then Sanders. After that Jacobs deserves a rematch if he keeps winning. was a good competitive fight.

Did you see that picture I posted? What does that picture say? The image is not showing for me, throws some error, but I asumed it's from that scoring application. The app is a great idea, but you don't know if all their users are from one country or place. All the forums show that 60%+ of people saw GGG win, so your claim that fans saw Jacobs win is false. Read the post above this...

Liar POS. Boxingscene, 60% of people voted that Golovkin won. 40% voted that Jacobs won. Source https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=740174 The polls on every forum show most fans saw GGG win. Unlike the polls of Kovalev Ward... where 72% saw Kovalev win. Here, and also in other forums. BLH poll 62% Gennady Golovkin (2163 votes) 29% Daniel Jacobs (1027 votes) 9% Draw (312 votes) 3502 votes total Boxing24 poll GGG 287 vote(s) 70.0% Jacobs 123 vote(s) 30.0% Mostly boxingscene and YouTube trolls had DJ winning

Rematch should happen but after the Canelo-GGG fight. Jacobs can face Saunders for the title in the mean time then you can do a unification between Jacobs and GGG-Canelo winner (probably not until 1st half of 2018 anyway).

Please stop acting like he dominated..there were no huge scorecards in his favor and Jacobs is still the fighter he has to face to become Lineal since he is the #2 middleweight in the world The rematch would make more money then the 1st fight and Jacobs earned it ESPN 115-112 Golovkin HBO 115-112 Golovkin The Ring Magazine 115-112 Golovkin The Guardian 115-112 Golovkin International Business Times 115-112 Golovkin LA Times 114-113 Golovkin Boxing Scene 114-113 Golovkin Associated Press 114-113 Golovkin CBS 114-114 Telegraph 114-114 Yahoo 114-113 Jacobs Box Nation 114-113 Jacobs USA Today 115-113 Jacobs Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs 15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs the media saw it almost dead even so lets kill this nonsense First canelo then Sanders. After that Jacobs deserves a rematch if he keeps winning.