Robberies in the UK

Or white beat chisora? I dont think saunders was a robbery, i dont think akaov wrestled a title from a champion and saunders was absolute **** but there wasnt a huge percentage of people, only saunders detractors who were saying robbery. No journalist or boxing expert of note said it was a robbery, they said it was a **** fight which it was. It stunk out the leisure center it was held in. Besides, usually when people cry UK robbery its always about Hearn and his apparent ability to bypass every boxing rule and buy every judge that suits someones opinion. Whyte chisora many had as a draw, but when Whyte won noone cried robbery, it was a fight that could have gone either way. Froch had it a draw, nelson had whyte by one and bellew had chisora by two so it was up in the air. Neither fight is a robbery.. by any sense of the word.

Or white beat chisora?

Did anyone think saunders beat akavov?

If the fight was close like the GGG v Jacobs one, trust me GGG wouldnt get the nod here. This one wasn't even close, so yes am glad the judges reflect that too.

I am not from the UK(obviously:D) but I must say bad judging goes on everywhere, correction, bad officiating. Vegas had the reputation, Germany,, Russia, UK, USA etc. Officials want to work and promoters have a say in who gets the work. Fighters are protected, especially stars. But in defense of boxing this goes on in all sports.

I asked that Red Foxx idiot once to name big fights in the UK that ended in robberies for foreign fighters, because he said there "were so many" but he couldn't name 5 lol The UK has solid judging because the judges panel is normally all international and Hearn doesnt have the reach of GBP or Haymon to seduce judges often enough.

Even the commentating during this fight was brilliant. Adam Smith and Froch gave Linares a lot of praise and credit for what he was doing in the ring.

So to recap, you've said Beltran-Burns four times, two fights that didn't go the distance and the UK fighter lost each time and one fight that took place outside of the UK. You really are a genius. The cases of Brook and McDonnell were the same that Canela vs Floyd and CJ Ross. Stop crying

All the cases are robberies but the foreign fighters(Golovkin, Vargas)were too good to destroy all the tries. That fight of Beltran vs Burns was a complete joke. And that's what I remember but securely there are a lot of more cases that other people could remember So to recap, you've said Beltran-Burns four times, two fights that didn't go the distance and the UK fighter lost each time and one fight that took place outside of the UK. You really are a genius.

Liborio Solís vs McDonnell. It was in a "neutral" place but was organized for that promotion of u.k Youve literally just played yourself by "neutral" .. thats what it was, lol completely neutral!! The judge that scored the only score they appealed to the WBA about ( 117-111 ) was American ? and wasnt assigned by the promoter or anything to do with the BBBofC.. it was a WBA appointed neutral judge :loser: He won a unanimous decision and because it wasnt in the UK, the ref wasnt british and none of the judges were hahahaha funnily enough, the WBA also rejected the appeal lol.

Liborio Solís vs McDonnell. It was in a "neutral" place but was organized for that promotion of u.k

But everyone agreed mcdonell lost.. his promoter agreed he lost and that the scorecard was bad. The BBBofC said the scorecard was bad lol. In order for a robbery, you have to have all parties conspire in that robbery ? lol. Again, Ceja lost that fight you just dont like one score card being so far apart LOL. A Mexican Judge scored Mcdonell winner!!! :dance::bottle: Everyone admits burns beltran was a bad decision, i already have in this discussion with you. You come up with nothing new, just the same old rhetoric. Brook GGG was MD on the scorwcards, the only judge that had brook up was canadian?! lol All the cases are robberies but the foreign fighters(Golovkin, Vargas)were too good to destroy all the tries. That fight of Beltran vs Burns was a complete joke. And that's what I remember but securely there are a lot of more cases that other people could remember

And brook winning the fight vs GGG? Lol. Mcdonell draw vs Vargas? McDonell vs Ceja doing ****, only. Beltran vs Ricky Burns. But everyone agreed mcdonell lost.. his promoter agreed he lost and that the scorecard was bad. The BBBofC said the scorecard was bad lol. In order for a robbery, you have to have all parties conspire in that robbery ? lol. Again, Ceja lost that fight you just dont like one score card being so far apart LOL. A Mexican Judge scored Mcdonell winner!!! :dance::bottle: Everyone admits burns beltran was a bad decision, i already have in this discussion with you. You come up with nothing new, just the same old rhetoric. Brook GGG was MD on the scorwcards, the only judge that had brook up was canadian?! lol

ref said it was due to punch contact, look at the slow mo of the video, clear punch contact. You might not like the refs decision but he based it on rules that are documented.. even if i said ok, my mexican puppet il give you that one.. your current robbery status sits at 2. Burns, who was coincidentally victimised by a ref in texas against a mexican himself, and flanagan.. So burns and flanagan are more robberies than the USA and germany? ok mate :bottle: I advise you take a look at the thread made on this forum that suggest otherwise. And brook winning the fight vs GGG? Lol. Mcdonell draw vs Vargas? McDonell vs Ceja doing ****, only. Beltran vs Ricky Burns.

So a fight that ends with an injury in the shoulder of one of the fighters by a clash of arms IN FU.CKING ROUND 1. Is a win for the other guy? Hahahaha you are a joke! That was a clearly no contest. U.K has the famous of be the empire of the robberies in this sport. You can be here crying 1018373 hours and saying the contrary but all the people knows what it is. ref said it was due to punch contact, look at the slow mo of the video, clear punch contact. You might not like the refs decision but he based it on rules that are documented.. even if i said ok, my mexican puppet il give you that one.. your current robbery status sits at 2. Burns, who was coincidentally victimised by a ref in texas against a mexican himself, and flanagan.. So burns and flanagan are more robberies than the USA and germany? ok mate :bottle: I advise you take a look at the thread made on this forum that suggest otherwise.

Find me quotes of you moaning and crying like a ***** when Martin got handed the IBF belt in the fight with Glazkov, considering they were fightng for a vacant paper belt and technically drawing on the scorecards LOL and i might believe you're impartial and not just someone who dislikes the UK. Oh no.. i dont need to learn about the rules, they are as they are. You just dont like the fact the ref said it was a contact TKO and not accidental :bottle: So a fight that ends with an injury in the shoulder of one of the fighters by a clash of arms IN FU.CKING ROUND 1. Is a win for the other guy? Hahahaha you are a joke! That was a clearly no contest. U.K has the famous of be the empire of the robberies in this sport. You can be here crying 1018373 hours and saying the contrary but all the people knows what it is.

That fight was clearly a no contest, jerk. And Zepeda won the first round. Learn about the rules Find me quotes of you moaning and crying like a ***** when Martin got handed the IBF belt in the fight with Glazkov, considering they were fightng for a vacant paper belt and technically drawing on the scorecards LOL and i might believe you're impartial and not just someone who dislikes the UK. Oh no.. i dont need to learn about the rules, they are as they are. You just dont like the fact the ref said it was a contact TKO and not accidental :bottle:

We get some hometown decisions in the UK but lets not pretend it doesn't happen in the US. Remember Hooker v Perez? :lol1:

You're in a minority on that opinion mr mexican lover.. but i like your one example of a well scored fight to rub out all the robberies on US soil. Zepeda flanagan was ruled because the injury was sustained through contact from the other fighter.. i.e a punch?! therefore when Zepeda retired it was a TKO for flanagan.. do you not know the rules or something? You realise there was a thread with a poll of who has the most robberies, and the USA and Germany dominated the UK on here? lol.. keep tryin doe :bottle: That fight was clearly a no contest, jerk. And Zepeda won the first round. Learn about the rules

McDonnell didn't do anything, only was running and blocking punches with his arms. A draw was the more objective. There is a lot of examples of fights in USA that were good scored, recently the Thai guy vs Gonzalez. And what about the fight of Zepeda vs Flanagan? Hahahahahahaha! Zepeda injury was in the ****ing round 2 caused for a clash of arms, like the 1:30 minute of the round 2 and the fight was declared a win to terry. A win by TKO hahahahahaha. Stop trying to defend the fu.ckin reality. U.K is the empire of robberies, PERIOD. You're in a minority on that opinion mr mexican lover.. but i like your one example of a well scored fight to rub out all the robberies on US soil. Zepeda flanagan was ruled because the injury was sustained through contact from the other fighter.. i.e a punch?! therefore when Zepeda retired it was a TKO for flanagan.. do you not know the rules or something? You realise there was a thread with a poll of who has the most robberies, and the USA and Germany dominated the UK on here? lol.. keep tryin doe :bottle: