Why when we see a boxer with power we assume they cant box?

It's part of the human minds inability to cope with sh*t that isn't black or white. No different to a Catcher in baseball who can't hit - people automatically think he's all glove. But being a bad hitter doesn't make you a good defender. Same in boxing - we think, with the absence or presence or something, there must be a counter-balance to the skillset. That, and people suck.

LOL this. Too many threads get made off of what 3 trolls make a thread a day about. Just send those 3 mfers a message next time instead of making a thread almost no one thinks like. And what's funny is those 3 trolls don't even address the response threads. They probably just sit back and laugh at the reactions they caused.

No, he means boxers, technicians who have power: Golovkin, Kovalev, Wlad, Big Baby, Jacobs, Rigo. And the answer is because those people DKSAB. That's really the only answer, you have to not know what you are watching to make those kinds of assumptions and not distinguish fighters above from true face first brawlers like Ruslan for example. It's the same mistake as people assuming a defensive fighter can't have a great offense (Lomachenko, Mayweather, Fury) So really this thread is dedicated to red bar alt trolls that call fighters like Kovalev face first brawlers? Because nobody being serious has ever said such a thing.

I don't understand. Can you name some specific examples? You mean like boxer/punchers that fall in love with their power and abandon their boxing skills? No, he means boxers, technicians who have power: Golovkin, Kovalev, Wlad, Big Baby, Jacobs, Rigo. And the answer is because those people DKSAB. That's really the only answer, you have to not know what you are watching to make those kinds of assumptions and not distinguish fighters above from true face first brawlers like Ruslan for example. It's the same mistake as people assuming a defensive fighter can't have a great offense (Lomachenko, Mayweather, Fury)

yup. You're also a retard and DKSAB if you disagree with their opinion on those controversial decisions. It only works to their narrative. When Whitaker lost controversial decisions. they are automatically considered wins. When Floyd or Ward or Canelo(son of Floyd) wins controversial decisions. they are automatically considered wins. if you disagree then you're a retard that DKSAB Boxing to close decisions is the only way to display the sweet science fam

Power probably teaches boxers bad habits, we only have to look at David Haye's performance up against Tony Bellew! even though he was winning the opening rounds before his injury! there was no thought or creativity in his work, he was just loading up on shots! (David Haye under the instruction of Adam Booth never used to fight in this manner!).... I expect allot of things to change in David Haye's training, leading up to his aspired comeback!

its only floyd fanboys. pac outboxed floyd and landed the much cleaner punches but he was schooled. when marquez landed the slightly better punches in pac-marq 3 he was robbed said the same people. kov outlanded, landed better punhes, and controlled ward with the jab but ward still outboxed him somehow.

it's the mayweather, canelo and ward's fans coping psychology. if you can't box an opponent to a controversial decision in your hometown, then you are a brawling caveman. this is the sweet science fam.

I dont but most here do. Because a lot of time when fighters load up and sit on their punches, their footwork and control of range go out the window.

I don't understand. Can you name some specific examples? You mean like boxer/punchers that fall in love with their power and abandon their boxing skills?