1) he is suppose to be top 3-4 pound for pound and has 0 wins over elite opposition
2)he is the only fighter in the top ten p4p who has NOT A) unified and fought for all his belts B) defeated an elite opponent C) won a title in more than 1 division
3) 2 out of 3 of his belts he never fought for....PAPER CHAMP
4) Guys that get crapped on this site have won more titles and defeated more champion....taken more risks like amir khan, danny garcia, adrien broner, hell guys in their 20s have a better resume than this guy
thoughts? commments?
this is gonna be good
Its Floyd who was considered no1 so didn't take risks to be higher echelon atg.
Didn't want to risk zero so barely ever fought toughest opponents avsailabke. Avoided brook, Thurman to fight berto
https://s18.postimg.org/ukwat1heh/addtext_com_MDIy_Mz_Uz_NTA0_MTc1.jpg
^^^^^they don't expect him to but aren't man enough to admit it...they need a hero....fvck a hero I like competitive fights with the best fighting each other
my comment is you should not use alts
i havent made a thread about this guy in a long time....the butt hurt is real when it comes to GGG fans
What is all this alt talk with you weirdos? change the record a bit yeah.
I'm not a die-hard GGG fan. I'm just a fan like I am with most fighters out there. So you failed with that one.
.....for the response....and the Garglers to chime in....you're not slow bro...
no body was saying "move the **** on" when yall were saying roy jones dont fight nobody, floyd mayweather dont take risks
the same posters dick riding this guy trashed them....Floyd and roy had better resumes and took more risks than this guy when both were 25 years old....thats pathetic
Floyd Mayweather didn't take risks. Roy Jones took steroids.
1) he is suppose to be top 3-4 pound for pound and has 0 wins over elite opposition
2)he is the only fighter in the top ten p4p who has NOT A) unified and fought for all his belts B) defeated an elite opponent C) won a title in more than 1 division
3) 2 out of 3 of his belts he never fought for....PAPER CHAMP
4) Guys that get crapped on this site have won more titles and defeated more champion....taken more risks like amir khan, danny garcia, adrien broner, hell guys in their 20s have a better resume than this guy
thoughts? commments?
this is gonna be good
"just kick you" fffffin flowmo:bottle:
1) he is suppose to be top 3-4 pound for pound and has 0 wins over elite opposition
2)he is the only fighter in the top ten p4p who has NOT A) unified and fought for all his belts B) defeated an elite opponent C) won a title in more than 1 division
3) 2 out of 3 of his belts he never fought for....PAPER CHAMP
4) Guys that get crapped on this site have won more titles and defeated more champion....taken more risks like amir khan, danny garcia, adrien broner, hell guys in their 20s have a better resume than this guy
thoughts? commments?
this is gonna be good
Amir and Danny have better wins than GGG but not Broner.. Broner took more risk, yes, but failed everytime. Other than that, I agree. GGG is overrated until proven otherwise. But its nothing new. Now the new sensation is Spence. Spence here in NSB, would KO, destroy, dismantled every fighter he faces, while is biggest fight is Algieri. Nothing new under the sun....But GGG isnt top 5 P4P thats for sure.
Sadly, I got to agree with this. Hes being avoided, yes but something needs to happen. Hes a very talented guy but hes overrated at the moment. I cant see him being this high P4P. He NEEDS to fight someone. I know alot of guys are ****ing but hey, give them more money. No choice... Something needs to happen ASAP!!!
can you dispute what i said with facts of your own...not excuses...but FACTS AND STATS....I will wait
Only one thing you pointed out was factual.
1) he is suppose to be top 3-4 pound for pound and has 0 wins over elite opposition
2)he is the only fighter in the top ten p4p who has NOT A) unified and fought for all his belts B) defeated an elite opponent C) won a title in more than 1 division
3) 2 out of 3 of his belts he never fought for....PAPER CHAMP
4) Guys that get crapped on this site have won more titles and defeated more champion....taken more risks like amir khan, danny garcia, adrien broner, hell guys in their 20s have a better resume than this guy
thoughts? commments?
this is gonna be good
1.) This is subjective and not factual.
2.) Not factual and P4P lists vary. Besides, Ward was ranked P4P for 4 years and he only fought at one weight class. Weight jumping class is a sufficient condition not a necessary condition.
3.) And? Two of the opponents he was supposed to fight ended up vacating the belts (Geale and Canelo). Again, the belts are not a necessary condition to him being ranked p4p, they are sufficient.
4.) Guys that have been crapped on have also been exposed and have losses... Khan, Danny Garcia, Broner etc. Your second sentence is also subjective.
1) he is suppose to be top 3-4 pound for pound and has 0 wins over elite opposition
2)he is the only fighter in the top ten p4p who has NOT A) unified and fought for all his belts B) defeated an elite opponent C) won a title in more than 1 division
3) 2 out of 3 of his belts he never fought for....PAPER CHAMP
4) Guys that get crapped on this site have won more titles and defeated more champion....taken more risks like amir khan, danny garcia, adrien broner, hell guys in their 20s have a better resume than this guy
thoughts? commments?
this is gonna be good
https://media.giphy.com/media/GSxllNr3GuP6M/source.gif
Grrrr GGG I hate you. Why can't you just retire. I can't stop thinking about you 24/7. You're in my mind. bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahaha ggg takes up your whole day.
i havent made a thread about this guy in months bro....whatever other posters do is their business
you know you're not required to reply or enter the thread....right?
So why start again? Just because you haven't done something in any particular amount of time doesn't suddenly erase events prior.
No ****. You know you're not required to start a new thread or respond to everybody's opinion...right? You started the thread saying this was your opinion. You've heard mine. It's a two-way street my friend. Good day.
You can have a better resume than someone but don't mean you beat the poerson with trash resume.
Nelo supposedly has better resume than GGG, but GGG is rated higher and expected to destroy nelo. Nelo echoes those thoughts as well he's not ready for GGG he said. Or maybe nelo is now. Nelo has better resume.....supposedly. But he barely won those fights. Everything is taken into consideration.
GGG stops everyone so the standards for GGG is higher than mere mortals. GGG is the new PAC. He's expoected to ko fighters as well as outbox them
You are free to trash GGG to your heart's content and nobody can stop you. You can be as unfair and unreasonable as you want. You are so angry at GGG for being highly regarded and highly ranked but how is that his fault? If Ring, Boxing Scene, HBO, ESPN and Boxrec all rate him high on their PFP list how is that his fault. He gets hype because he kicks ass and you just can't stand it. He got off to a very late start as a pro so it's not fair to compare him with Thurman who turned pro at a much younger age. You again blame him for winning two belts without fighting for them instead of blaming the champions who gave him those belts without fighting for them. You are about as unreasonable and unfair as it is possible to be. Your so called facts are just a pack of lies.
what is fair and unreasonable about stating facts?
has he beaten anyone elite? no......do you have to defeat elite competition to be considered p4p......yes
to be the man you have to unify all the belts or beat the lineal champion....has he done that? no...2 of his belts he didnt even fight for
has he beat any of the top 3 middleweights....no?
for now he is a paper champion and a hype job until he proves he is the best and takes more risks.....deal with it
None of those fighters ducked Thurman, which is why they're on his resume. Your comparison is useless. But go ahead and keep making a fool of yourselves and keep denying the guy is being ducked like a plague.
just keep ignoring he is a hypejob and paper champion who is billed as p4p yet doesnt have the wins to merit placement...nor has he proven he is the best at 160....its all speculation....deal with it
None of those fighters ducked Thurman, which is why they're on his resume. Your comparison is useless. But go ahead and keep making a fool of yourselves and keep denying the guy is being ducked like a plague.
nobody was calling out thurman....thurman/porter shouldve happened years ago.
that ducking excuse is beating a dead horse...dudes been on HBO 3 years straight...3 years..its a lot deeper than "they ducking him doe"
My comment is that you should seek help.
Stop with these threads all the time. Give it a rest you sad nutter.
my comment is you should not use alts
i havent made a thread about this guy in a long time....the butt hurt is real when it comes to GGG fans
I can't tell if you're upset. I can only go by how many threads and posts I see dedicated to one person (yes you do have others, but there is a significant amount). What you said wasn't all facts so don't get it twisted, even reading what you've been saying up till now. It's whatever though. You do you. I just get irritated seeing so many threads about GGG, especially when it's **** that's been said multiple times. Keep it in threads already made. I want to see what else is going on without having to scroll past needless threads. And that goes for both sides.
i havent made a thread about this guy in months bro....whatever other posters do is their business
you know you're not required to reply or enter the thread....right?