If you last more than 5 rounds against ggg and win 2 rounds and land an uppercut you've basically won the fight. No other fighter has this type of standard to hold up to. Mayweather throughout this career has lost many rounds and had close fights and looked subpar against average level fighters and everyone called it a masterpiece. Other come to mind like pavlik struggling with bums and being dropped, martinez being dropped by bums, hopkins going 12 with tomatoe cans, toney being out boxed twice by a 5 7 midget in montell griffin. GGG finishes everyone and hardly loses a round but if his opponent wins a round or goes more than 6 rounds everyone start saying how the other guy did such a great job. I don't think any fighter in the history of boxing has had this problem. If jacobs wins 2 rounds everyone will say ggg is a hypejob and jacobs is a great boxer and ggg got lucky. Those are the FACTS.
who ducked Brook besides Khan??? and why do you keep saying Floyd ducked him?? when did that happen?? post a link please
Why u saying Khan ducked brook? Brook wanted Floyd real bad. Floyd wanted berto. If it looks like a duck. Probably is a duck.
The only reason Brook hasn't fought Floyd isn't because of Brook.
Why u keep talking resume? Brook might have weaker resume than PAC or Garcia. But he was expected to do better than Garcia or PAC would against ggg. Brooks resume is weak as he is ducked just like ggg is. Floyd ducked the test
No he wasnt...he was expected to get beat up and stopped
You can have a weak resume but be considered a better fighter. So stop mentioning Brooks resume. Brook has no control over duckers. Brook can't help that Floyd ducked him
who ducked Brook besides Khan??? and why do you keep saying Floyd ducked him?? when did that happen?? post a link please
Brook is known for only fighting IBF mandatories and was mocked and laughed at for it..now all the sudden he fights GGG posters liek you wanna act like he has some great resume...wow
Why u keep talking resume? Brook might have weaker resume than PAC or Garcia. But he was expected to do better than Garcia or PAC would against ggg. Brooks resume is weak as he is ducked just like ggg is. Floyd ducked the test
champs at 147
Thurman-WBA
Pacquiao-WBO
Garcia-WBA
Brook-IBF
NOW TELL ME WHICH ONE HAS THE WORST RESUME
You can have a weak resume but be considered a better fighter. So stop mentioning Brooks resume. Brook has no control over duckers. Brook can't help that Floyd ducked him
]Brook beats berto in 3 rounds actually not 4. Floyd don't take toughest tests. Floyd just wants too pad his CV out with weakest champs. Floyd would take 18 months off and then would fight an opponent which made people question what's that all about, puzzled about his opponents and choices. But fkoiyd knew what hecwas doing all along. He wanted to beat more weak champions than anyone ever did. Whilst avoiding toughest and most dangerous foes.
Brook takes toughest tests as he wanted tiotio show hoiw great he was by beating GGG. Floyd's not about that. Floyd wants to boast stats that nobody cares about
Brook is known for only fighting IBF mandatories and was mocked and laughed at for it..now all the sudden he fights GGG posters liek you wanna act like he has some great resume...wow
All your posts reek of hatred, bias and stupidity. I really feel sorry for you.
champs at 147
Thurman-WBA
Pacquiao-WBO
Garcia-WBA
Brook-IBF
NOW TELL ME WHICH ONE HAS THE WORST RESUME
Is that the same poster is who mad because Money didn't fight GGG? I remember seeing a post awhile ago from him wanting Floyd to challenge himself but not the other guy.
yep..exact same guy
He is not held at a higher standard. you keep trying to sh1t on Floyd for fighting Berto in his fair well fight..yet Berto has a better resume and is more accomplished then anyone GGG has ever fought period.
Is that the same poster is who mad because Money didn't fight GGG? I remember seeing a post awhile ago from him wanting Floyd to challenge himself but not the other guy.
when have i ever gave a damn about eubanks jr? Who the hell has be beaten?
All Floyd fans like yourself criticised ggg for fighting Brook rather than eubankni! Don't deny it!
you wanted to see eubank v ggg. Eubank lost to bjs and then you said what the hell has bjs did that makes him a good win for ggg?
when have i ever gave a damn about eubanks jr? Who the hell has be beaten?
Brook is the weakest and least proven champ at 147 hands down, he has by far the weakest resume...did you sell your account?? because you are posting absolute rubbish..Like i said name one fighter on GGG's resume who has accomplished more then Berto and is more proven...
]Brook beats berto in 3 rounds actually not 4. Floyd don't take toughest tests. Floyd just wants too pad his CV out with weakest champs. Floyd would take 18 months off and then would fight an opponent which made people question what's that all about, puzzled about his opponents and choices. But fkoiyd knew what hecwas doing all along. He wanted to beat more weak champions than anyone ever did. Whilst avoiding toughest and most dangerous foes.
Brook takes toughest tests as he wanted tiotio show hoiw great he was by beating GGG. Floyd's not about that. Floyd wants to boast stats that nobody cares about
Brook is the weakest and least proven champ at 147 hands down, he has by far the weakest resume...did you sell your account?? because you are posting absolute rubbish..Like i said name one fighter on GGG's resume who has accomplished more then Berto and is more proven...
All your posts reek of hatred, bias and stupidity. I really feel sorry for you.
Brook is the weakest and least proven champ at 147 hands down, he has by far the weakest resume...did you sell your account?? because you are posting absolute rubbish..Like i said name one fighter on GGG's resume who has accomplished more then Berto and is more proven...
You wanted to see eubank v ggg. Eubank lost to bjs and then you said what the hell has bjs did that makes him a good win for GGG?
Funny to see the dummygraphic talking about "resumes" and literally exposing themselves as being boxrec fans and not actual boxing fans. Can't see and gauge a fighter with their eyes and ignore the facts, just hating to ride with their bias and Agenda. This forum is just a cancerous pile of trash, 90% of the regular decent posters left or just barely go here anymore. Thats what's left is pretty disgusting.
Brook is the weakest and least proven champ at 147 hands down, he has by far the weakest resume...did you sell your account?? because you are posting absolute rubbish..Like i said name one fighter on GGG's resume who has accomplished more then Berto and is more proven...
Brook has weaker resume than khan but every expects brook to ko khan. Floyd don't take toughest fights. Doesn't take the fights people want to see
Brook bests berto in 3 rounds actually not 4. Floyd don't take toughest tests. Floyd just wants too pad his CV out with weakest champs
Brook is the weakest and least proven champ at 147 hands down, he has by far the weakest resume...did you sell your account?? because you are posting absolute rubbish..Like i said name one fighter on GGG's resume who has accomplished more then Berto and is more proven...
What fighter on GGG's resume has a better resume and accomplished more then Berto??
Brook beats berto in 3 rounds actually not 4. Floyd don't take toughest tests. Floyd just wants too pad his CV out with weakest champs. Floyd would take 18 months off and then would fight an opponent which made people question what's that all about, puzzled about his opponents and choices. But fkoiyd knew what hecwas doing all along. He wanted to beat more weak champions than anyone ever did. Whilst avoiding toughest and most dangerous foes.
Brook takes toughest tests as he wanted tiotio show hoiw great he was by beating GGG. Floyd's not about that.
Lollllll Bull****.
Yes Larry x is a diehard Floyd fan. I usually don't post too much. But this is a thread I thought ID hang around in. I'm realizing I'm going to have to camp my ass here because these guys will argue without making a valid poi t to the bitter end
Brook would ko berto in 4 rou nds.
What fighter on GGG's resume has a better resume and accomplished more then Berto??
Lollllll Bull****.
Yes Larry x is a diehard Floyd fan. I usually don't post too much. But this is a thread I thought ID hang around in. I'm realizing I'm going to have to camp my ass here because these guys will argue without making a valid poi t to the bitter end
He is not held at a higher standard. you keep trying to sh1t on Floyd for fighting Berto in his fair well fight..yet Berto has a better resume and is more accomplished then anyone GGG has ever fought period.
Brook would ko berto in 4 rou nds.