scoring aggresion

How would u score the 3nd half of the Oscar Trinidad fight? Oscar was backpedall ing and landing jabs while Trinidad pursued.

yea it was weird that all 3 saw it like that,they can protect theyr decision doe. Yea prospects often wins even when they lose,i swa Hooker fights where he was better imo he was head hunting,he can do better,but i agree he will lose soon. have a good day sir,Green given for fair and honest talk:boxing: Cool. I've greened you at some point so unfortunately I can't return the favor until I spread it around some. Lol

Do you watch those FS1 cards with the prospects? The Hooker decision is common with prospects because they don't want to derail the kids career with a loss. You hear stories about promoters telling them just finish on their feet and they are good. Not trying to justify it because it was a horrible decision. But that's common with up and coming fighters. He clearly doesn't have "it" and will get his coming for him soon. Kovalev vs Ward I look at it as the range of possible scores was 115-112 for Kovalev to 114-113 for Ward. I find it odd that all 3 judges had the balance beam tilted in Wards favor but the scores themselves were justifiable. I think a split draw or majority draw would be the most likely outcome in such a close fight. yea it was weird that all 3 saw it like that,they can protect theyr decision doe. Yea prospects often wins even when they lose,i swa Hooker fights where he was better imo he was head hunting,he can do better,but i agree he will lose soon. have a good day sir,Green given for fair and honest talk:boxing:

Yea but we are not judges,and boxing showed that judges can be biased or " influanced" ,you watched this Hooker fight? we can argue about Kov-Ward it was controversial,but Hooker fight was stright robbery i was worried from this moment and maybe thats why its harder for me to accept the verdict(another bias factor lol hard to be objective) Do you watch those FS1 cards with the prospects? The Hooker decision is common with prospects because they don't want to derail the kids career with a loss. You hear stories about promoters telling them just finish on their feet and they are good. Not trying to justify it because it was a horrible decision. But that's common with up and coming fighters. He clearly doesn't have "it" and will get his coming for him soon. Kovalev vs Ward I look at it as the range of possible scores was 115-112 for Kovalev to 114-113 for Ward. I find it odd that all 3 judges had the balance beam tilted in Wards favor but the scores themselves were justifiable. I think a split draw or majority draw would be the most likely outcome in such a close fight.

I don't like boxers who are wannabes slickers but try pickpocketing and steal a win! Kovly prob felt ward was doing nothing so kovy didn't do as much as he could have. Whilst ward wasn't doing much the judges had other ideas and were actually scoring that bs.. So in actual fact it's conning kov at end of the day. Kov is just doing as much as he thinks he needs to do. He didn't think ward was doing anything so brings his level down to wards. But the judges are actually scoring ward? be cerefull man some ppl made a war from this fight:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: 2nd part of fight wasnt good at all

I agree. Seeing a fighters previous fights can bias your scoring. You see Kovalev not landing as much as usual and Ward getting hit more than usual it can sway the rounds in one direction. It's hard to throw out pre-fight biases when scoring a fight. Yea but we are not judges,and boxing showed that judges can be biased or " influanced" ,you watched this Hooker fight? we can argue about Kov-Ward it was controversial,but Hooker fight was stright robbery i was worried from this moment and maybe thats why its harder for me to accept the verdict(another bias factor lol hard to be objective)

I don't like boxers who are wannabes slickers but try pickpocketing and steal a win! Kovly prob felt ward was doing nothing so kovy didn't do as much as he could have. Whilst ward wasn't doing much the judges had other ideas and were actually scoring that bs.. So in actual fact it's conning kov at end of the day. Kov is just doing as much as he thinks he needs to do. He didn't think ward was doing anything so brings his level down to wards. But the judges are actually scoring ward?

If gets hit but throw back i have no problem to give him rounds,its just some concept that agressor need to do "More".And this narrative "if it goes to distance Ward wins if KO Kovalev win" its some BS regardless who won,and in which way its going,its wrong in both situations I agree. Seeing a fighters previous fights can bias your scoring. You see Kovalev not landing as much as usual and Ward getting hit more than usual it can sway the rounds in one direction. It's hard to throw out pre-fight biases when scoring a fight.

It goes both ways though. When a defensive fighter gets touched he automatically loses the round because defensive fighters aren't supposed to get hit cleanly. They have zero margin for error. If gets hit but throw back i have no problem to give him rounds,its just some concept that agressor need to do "More".And this narrative "if it goes to distance Ward wins if KO Kovalev win" its some BS regardless who won,and in which way its going,its wrong in both situations

Its fair, but ppl like to talk about this uneffective aggresion ,its BS imo ,if opponent is not doing much either It goes both ways though. When a defensive fighter gets touched he automatically loses the round because defensive fighters aren't supposed to get hit cleanly. They have zero margin for error.

I try not to complicate things. I just try my best to see who's landing cleaner whether they are the aggressor or running the 100 meter dash Its fair, but ppl like to talk about this uneffective aggresion ,its BS imo ,if opponent is not doing much either

I try not to complicate things. I just try my best to see who's landing cleaner whether they are the aggressor or running the 100 meter dash