People are praising Jacobs for beating Quillin, but how good was Quillin?

When Danny knocked Quillin off, he was legit #2 (even though Danny's trainer is on record saying Lemieux was a better win than Quillin). The fight ended before it was a fight. If they had a rematch, and Quillin's head was on right, Danny would be the underdog once again. Quillin was good. N'dam is a good boxer, especially when they fought. And Quillin schooled N'Dam. I wouldn't say that. N'Dam would be winning rounds boxing Pete's ears off and then get floored. That fight, coming off the Wright and McKewan wins, was Quillins career peak. Guerrero was a soft fighter and Quillin had problems in that fight, then had real problems vs Rosado, looked flat vs Koneckny, and vacated vs Korobov, struggled hard with Lee.

Golovkin has beaten at least 3 fighters as good or better than Quillin. Hell, Rosado was arguably beating Quillin in their fight before that ridiculous stoppage. People have always overrated Quillin.

Danny Jacobs thinks one Golovkin is worth more than 2 Quillins. :lol1:

Quillin would've been GGG's best win by far.

Quillen would be the biggest name on GGG resume sadly. Even thoughQuillin himself was vastly overrated. He was getting beat by Rosado if it wasnt from that eye... What made Quillin better than Lemieux or Murray? Please explain.

Quillin was good. N'dam is a good boxer, especially when they fought. And Quillin schooled N'Dam. But I personally don't give Danny any credit for the Quillin win. Quillin has been struggling with weight for a WHILE. He started his career fighting above MW, and couldn't make weight for a title fight with Andy. During his camp leading up to the Danny fight, there were several articles talking about how Quillin is seriously struggling making weight. The fight itself tells us nothing either. Quillin threw like 5 punches and was the first guy who got caught when they were both throwing haymakers. There was little defense in that fight, and only thing we saw was that Danny has power and connected first. Post fight is no better - Quillin talked about moving up to 168 afterwards and then went on an almost year-long break. He was overhyped and at one point in boxing world there was a pretty big demand for Quillin vs Golovkin. The main reason why he was considered a top MW though was his WBO belt. Which he later on vacated to duck one fighter, only to fight for it against a fighter he was more comfortable with :lol1: He's a clown. Fans never cared about Quillin or beloved he was anything special. Only person who fell for that was Showtime. Haymon actually convinced Showtime that Jacobs and Quillin were stars. And that when they fought each other it Would be a big fight. Not even 300k people tuned in haha. Quillin is just another pointless Haymon creation that no one cares about. Thanks for your feedback, good arguments here. :hail::hail:

Fans never cared about Quillin or beloved he was anything special. Only person who fell for that was Showtime. Haymon actually convinced Showtime that Jacobs and Quillin were stars. And that when they fought each other it Would be a big fight. Not even 300k people tuned in haha. Quillin is just another pointless Haymon creation that no one cares about.

How many boxers can say they fought on even terms with the great Gabe Rosado?

He was overhyped and at one point in boxing world there was a pretty big demand for Quillin vs Golovkin. The main reason why he was considered a top MW though was his WBO belt. Which he later on vacated to duck one fighter, only to fight for it against a fighter he was more comfortable with :lol1: He's a clown.

Quillin was good. N'dam is a good boxer, especially when they fought. And Quillin schooled N'Dam. But I personally don't give Danny any credit for the Quillin win. Quillin has been struggling with weight for a WHILE. He started his career fighting above MW, and couldn't make weight for a title fight with Andy. During his camp leading up to the Danny fight, there were several articles talking about how Quillin is seriously struggling making weight. The fight itself tells us nothing either. Quillin threw like 5 punches and was the first guy who got caught when they were both throwing haymakers. There was little defense in that fight, and only thing we saw was that Danny has power and connected first. Post fight is no better - Quillin talked about moving up to 168 afterwards and then went on an almost year-long break.

lemieux got his title by beating ndam.. and beat him 3 yrs after quillin did.. so prob just as good as david

quillen was a good win he was ranked top 5, Quillen is a limited fighter with power n both hands and no amature background he will never beat any of the top. it was a good win, everyone praises GGGs top 10 list u cant do that and then trash the quillen win who was top 5, if GGG koed quillen first it would be mentioned that he beat a top 5 MW

People were excited about it because no one really likes Quillin

Please let someone post who has the IQ to understand my thread and is able to give valid reasons what made Quillin a great win for Jacobs. ? Was I wrong? Was he not a top 5 mw? How do you praise ggg for his top 10 mw wins but not agree quillen was a good win for Jacobs?

Quillen would be the biggest name on GGG resume sadly. Even thoughQuillin himself was vastly overrated. He was getting beat by Rosado if it wasnt from that eye... Kell Brook has more punch resistance than Quillin

Quillin is okay but a bit of a weight bully funny how Jacobs sparked him out. Watch him against Andy Lee he struggled a bit.

Quillen would be the biggest name on GGG resume sadly. Even thoughQuillin himself was vastly overrated. He was getting beat by Rosado if it wasnt from that eye...

Quillen was a top 5 mw. Can't praise all ggg wins over top 10 mw then disregard Jacobs win over quillen. Please let someone post who has the IQ to understand my thread and is able to give valid reasons what made Quillin a great win for Jacobs.

Quillen was a top 5 mw. Can't praise all ggg wins over top 10 mw then disregard Jacobs win over quillen.