This is my P4P top 5 in the world right now.
1) Andre Ward. This guy is leagues above everyone else when it comes to speed and skills and when he has schooled Kovalev, who is no better than Kessler and Froch, then the truth will be clear to everyone.
2) Roman Gonzales. The guy is undefeated in a lot of fights, with a high KO percentage, and he has just moved up in weight and defeated an undefeated champion there. His resume is not on par with Ward's, but he's definetely number 2 in the world right now.
3) Terrence Crawford. Undefeated and with impressive wins against Gamboa and Postol, Crawford is in the same category as Ward and Gonzales as being among the "inevitable 3" that one has to feature in any serious P4P top 3.
4) Tyson Fury. Undefeated and has looked untouchable in his last 3 fights. He is the current king of heavyweight and since he defeated Klitschko, it should be criminal to leave him out of a P4P top 5.
5) Sergey Kovalev. This guy punches very hard and his resume is far from bad. I'm sure Ward is gonna school him, but it ain't done till it's done and at the moment, it would be unfair to leave this undefeated KO machine out of a P4P top 5 list. He's at the bottom, though, as his skills are not on par with the other 4 on the list.
Switch Ward & Kovalev and I'll take that list.
I can't until Ward defeats him. Kov has looked like the best fighter in the world to me for the past couple of years
my unbiased top 10
Lomachenko
Golovkin
Fury
Wlad
Frampton
Honorable mention: The white guy from the Subway commercials (Mark Lee or whatever his name is) and Peter Quillin (needed a black dude for my honorable mention list so I don't look racist)
Lmfao!
:rofl:
why do you keep talking about education? lol i consistently post facts and shut your dumb arguments down.. then you respond with something something floyd something something crying
and how would i know youre lying about being in sweden? you sure act like a cuck so i would assume you were
My god do you actually take a chance to read any of this dribble that you type out?
my unbiased top 10
Lomachenko
Golovkin
Fury
Wlad
Frampton
Honorable mention: The white guy from the Subway commercials (Mark Lee or whatever his name is) and Peter Quillin (needed a black dude for my honorable mention list so I don't look racist)
Someone who has no education talking about other peoples IQ I'm sure you can see the Irony in that.
why do you keep talking about education? lol i consistently post facts and shut your dumb arguments down.. then you respond with something something floyd something something crying
and how would i know youre lying about being in sweden? you sure act like a cuck so i would assume you were
Red cyclone literally has the lowest boxing iq on this forum. Guy is a dunce
Someone who has no education talking about other peoples IQ I'm sure you can see the Irony in that.
Leo Santa Cruz is better than TC latest win
Gamboa beating Gamboa is kind of overrated not saying Gamboa isn't a good fighter but Terence on the night of the fight had atleast a 10+lbs advantage on the little guy plus a year of inactivity and his natural weight being more geared towards 125-130.
In essence I'm saying Lomachenko beating Rigondeuax out of Rigo's natural weight limit should be something we shouldn't take so seriously because we know Rigo isn't naturally a big guy that and he's fairly short.
Aside from Gamboa TC doesn't have a better win than Santa Cruz and Quigg.
Definitely don't think he is a better fighter Carl has more talent.
You think LSC is better than Victor Postol? I disagree. Wildly disagree. Add to that, Gamboa, Burns, Beltran, Lundy, Dulorme, Jean etc. These are all good fighters.
I would say that the likes of Gamboa, Postol, Burns, Beltran are vastly more proven than Scott Quigg. LSC has one good win in his career. Good fighter, nothing special.
But it's his list and his top five, not yours. You have a low opinion of Canelo and that's your right. Canelo is on many top 5 and top 10 pound for pound lists. Who are you to LOL at his choice of Canelo being top 5? Leave Canelo off your list but you shouldn't force your opinion on someone else.He also has a right to make his own choices.
Soooooooo, I forced my opinion on someone else?? Sure didn't. Here's what I do know though, 154 has a murderous row of top notch talent. I don't even think he's the best in the division he retreated to, to avoid GGG. And so what??:purity:
hmm, i don't think so. Terence Crawford has a better resume imo + is just a better fighter.
Leo Santa Cruz is better than TC latest win
Gamboa beating Gamboa is kind of overrated not saying Gamboa isn't a good fighter but Terence on the night of the fight had atleast a 10+lbs advantage on the little guy plus a year of inactivity and his natural weight being more geared towards 125-130.
In essence I'm saying Lomachenko beating Rigondeuax out of Rigo's natural weight limit should be something we shouldn't take so seriously because we know Rigo isn't naturally a big guy that and he's fairly short.
Aside from Gamboa TC doesn't have a better win than Santa Cruz and Quigg.
Definitely don't think he is a better fighter Carl has more talent.
To be fair I know you're trolling but If Terence Crawford is number 3 rated and in the top 5 then Frampton should honestly likely be ahead of him, Frampton best wins are better than all of TC's and he has constantly fought guys similar size to him.
hmm, i don't think so. Terence Crawford has a better resume imo + is just a better fighter.
Boy, you really like pure(boring) boxers. I can see you reading a dictionary and bookmarking in chapters....
i just think those five would be the most difficult to beat
i actually prefer golovkin and kovalev to all of them but lomachenko
I like Spence and I doubt that any good welterweight dares to fight him. But people who put him in their top 10 P4P lists, relax a bit, brothers. It's far too early to rank him there. When he has defeated Thurman, we can maybe start talking about it.