Chilemba is known as a very tricky fighter to look good against though so i don't see much of a comparison. If you ever wanted a fight to showcase your skill and look good, Chilemba would be someone you would stay away from.
Brook is a different fighter altogether, he isn't that type of fighter that goes out there to try and survive, he goes out there to win and knock people out if he can. He might be forced to survive tomorrow, but it won't be his Plan A, i'm sure of that.
i didnt think kovalev looked bad against chilemba. chilemba has a good chin and he knows how to fight and survive. he just can't punch, and at LHW that's a big problem.
that fight was much more about getting ready for andre ward than it was "looking good." i thought htat was the perfect opponent for him to prep for november.
brook is two weight classes below golovkin. chilemba had been a mid level contender at 175 for years.
Summed up perfectly; word for word
/thread
i didnt think kovalev looked bad against chilemba. chilemba has a good chin and he knows how to fight and survive. he just can't punch, and at LHW that's a big problem.
that fight was much more about getting ready for andre ward than it was "looking good." i thought htat was the perfect opponent for him to prep for november.
brook is two weight classes below golovkin. chilemba had been a mid level contender at 175 for years.