Overrating and underrating

You really are a stupid SOB. I said your are were bias in favor of BOTH black boxers and English boxers and you clearly are. You are pro Froch and Fury because they are English. You are pro Walters and Ward because they are black. Do you understand that? You probably still don't get it because you are really an incredibly stupid MFer. It's not a theory that you are bias in favor of English boxers and black boxers. It's a fact that you prove daily by the contents of your posts. Bro. The best boxers in the world today tends to be black and/or British. Show me a proven fighter with a good resume from any country and it will have my interest. The guys I like don't get a pass for just being black or british. They have proven themselves. That's something Golovkin and Lomachenko still haven't done. I can't accept their greatness before they prove it. I used to be a big fan of Kessler, who is not British, and Arthur Abraham, who is not british. And neither of them are black. I also really liked Pacquiao's fights. And I think Golovkin and Lomachenko could be good fighters, but they need to start proving it. For some reasons, british fighters and black fighters just seem more willing to prove themselves. Lomachenko refused to fight Walters, so he blew his chance. Golovkin refused to fight Ward, so he blev his chance. I don't give a **** about them not being British or Black. I just rate fighters based on their achievements, not based on losing to Salido or looking good when beating bums in Deontay Wilder style. Kovalev is a guy that Golovkin and Lomachenko could learn a lot from. Kovalev tried to fight Stevenson and he now got the balls to fight Ward, which is something Golovkin would never have the guts to do.

So you think I have some preference for English boxers? Last time I checked, Walters and Ward weren't English. So you think i have some preference for black boxers? Last time I checked, Froch and Fury weren't black. Your theory contradicts itself.You really are a stupid SOB. I said your are were bias in favor of BOTH black boxers and English boxers and you clearly are. You are pro Froch and Fury because they are English. You are pro Walters and Ward because they are black. Do you understand that? You probably still don't get it because you are really an incredibly stupid MFer. It's not a theory that you are bias in favor of English boxers and black boxers. It's a fact that you prove daily by the contents of your posts.

As a boxing expert... What weaknesses do you see in loma & ggg. I think it would be great to read the observations of an expert. Perhaps your observations could inspire confidence in the professional fighters that rate & duck both fighters

You aren't a boxing expert. You are just a very bias fan who I have to assume is a black Englishman judging by your extreme bias in favor of black boxers and English boxers and against boxers who aren't either English or black. GGG is the best middleweight in the world. He doesn't have to beat 175 pound boxers to prove himself to you. He never refused to fight Ward because Ward never made him a serious legal written offer to fight he could respond to. Ward just made a verbal challenge through the media at a time when GGG had a contracted fight coming up in a few weeks. Right after GGG beat Lemieux Ward was injured and out of action for about a year and he was no longer fighting at 168 anyway. You praise black boxers Ward and Walters and Englishmen Fury and Froch while you trash two excellent non black, non English fighters, GGG and Loma. Real boxing experts and not self proclaimed ones have both GGG and Loma on their top 10 best pound for pound boxers in the world. GGG is often ranked number 1 in the world pound for pound and he is almost never ranked lower than 3rd. I hope you enjoy GGG destroying your countryman Brook tomorrow. So you think I have some preference for English boxers? Last time I checked, Walters and Ward weren't English. So you think i have some preference for black boxers? Last time I checked, Froch and Fury weren't black. Your theory contradicts itself.

You aren't a boxing expert. You are just a very bias fan who I have to assume is a black Englishman judging by your extreme bias in favor of black boxers and English boxers and against boxers who aren't either English or black. GGG is the best middleweight in the world. He doesn't have to beat 175 pound boxers to prove himself to you. He never refused to fight Ward because Ward never made him a serious legal written offer to fight he could respond to. Ward just made a verbal challenge through the media at a time when GGG had a contracted fight coming up in a few weeks. Right after GGG beat Lemieux Ward was injured and out of action for about a year and he was no longer fighting at 168 anyway. You praise black boxers Ward and Walters and Englishmen Fury and Froch while you trash two excellent non black, non English fighters, GGG and Loma. Real boxing experts and not self proclaimed ones have both GGG and Loma on their top 10 best pound for pound boxers in the world. GGG is often ranked number 1 in the world pound for pound and he is almost never ranked lower than 3rd. I hope you enjoy GGG destroying your countryman Brook tomorrow.

brooks a massive welterweight and golovkins a small middleweight, will come down to skill as to who wins, not size What a load of crap, the best middleweight in the world is supposed to crush the 3rd or 4th best welterweight and that is what's going to happen.

Same goes for Rigondeaux then. How the hell is he ranked so high when his biggest win is Donaire? Donaire was a good win, but I agree, Rigo is too overrated. He needs to prove himself some more instead of fighting nobodies. Rigo's chin is also suspect. Everyone and their grandmas are knocking him down.

Same goes for Rigondeaux then. How the hell is he ranked so high when his biggest win is Donaire?

Golovkin DOES look unusually awesome when beating all his bum opponents. It makes one curious about how he would do against a good opponent. That's my sentiment about the guy and why I'm so frustrated w/ him. It's like watching James Spader on Blacklist. Great actor surrounded by hacks.

We got guys like Lomachenko, whose best win is Russel Jr. and who lost to Salido, while having done nothing else, except blatantly ducking Walters. Now he's satisfied fighting bums. He gets hyped like he's the greatest technician of all time. Source: http://www.boxingscene.com/team-lomachenko-we-zero-interest-walters--92521 We got guys like Golovkin who, while certainly looking impressive, has only fought bums and refused to fight Ward, which was his big chance to prove himself. Looking impressive is simply not enough, you have to look impressive against other guys who are also impressive. Not ***** like Daniel Geale, lol. Yet, people hate on guys like Ward, Crawford, Fury and Froch, who have all proven themselves through hard fights against tough opponents. A new guy comes and starts beating bums and ducking dangerous fights and suddenly, the new guy is ranked higher than the proven warriors? WTF is wrong with boxing fans? #blacklivesmatter

Yea. It's disgusting how many ignorant fans here say things like, "Ward is overrated, his best win is Froch." (I've seen several people here say that here recently. Mind-blowing levels of stupidity. I do get hyped about certain fighters before they prove themselves (I did that about Crawford) but I'm a huge believer in just being patient and waiting for a fighter to prove himself. Make your fandom and faith known, but don't get all pissed off at people who aren't on your bandwagon and still want to see him beat legit comp. If Golovkin wants a resume on par with the resume of Froch, then he will need to beat all of these: Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs, Lara and at least 1 168lbs champion. Until then, Golovkin is not even worthy of being mentioned in the same sentence as Froch Golovkin DOES look unusually awesome when beating all his bum opponents. It makes one curious about how he would do against a good opponent.

Yea. It's disgusting how many ignorant fans here say things like, "Ward is overrated, his best win is Froch." (I've seen several people here say that here recently. Mind-blowing levels of stupidity. I do get hyped about certain fighters before they prove themselves (I did that about Crawford) but I'm a huge believer in just being patient and waiting for a fighter to prove himself. Make your fandom and faith known, but don't get all pissed off at people who aren't on your bandwagon and still want to see him beat legit comp.

This won't come down to skills. Brook is simply not used to fighting against power punchers like Golovkin. He will crumble. He spared with froch so they are well prepared. Brook is used to it. If he gets koed by GGG its becasuse nobody is used to it.

When pro fighters highly rate other fighters then take note. These highly rated fighters have grown up in the gym, they've been involved in the sport longer than most fans have been following the sport

brooks a massive welterweight and golovkins a small middleweight, will come down to skill as to who wins, not size This won't come down to skills. Brook is simply not used to fighting against power punchers like Golovkin. He will crumble.

Brook, at 160lbs, is a bum. He got nothing to do there. Brook is kinda like Canelo. A drained guy who does good against smaller opponents, but won't last against guys his own size. The struggle against Shawn Porter says enough. Brook will crumble early in the fight. Who are these guys taht are Brook's size? Thurman, Spence and Porter are all big welterweights just like Brook. Thurman, Spence fought at 152 pounds in amateurs and Porter fought at 165pounds

GGG gets a pass, cos we know he wants nelo, bjs and Jacobs by they don't want to be a statistic of being another ko loss victim of GGG. GGG is above criticism. GGG don't need to move up until guys in his division step up to plate. Floyd on the other hand was famous for dodging toughest fights in his own division.

loma beating russell jr in the style he did was a very good win though, know a lot of people tipped russell to win. The hype with him is because hes one of best amateurs ever and his skill level is unreal. We'll get to see tomorrow how golovkin does against someone who isnt a 'bum' skill wise Brook, at 160lbs, is a bum. He got nothing to do there. Brook is kinda like Canelo. A drained guy who does good against smaller opponents, but won't last against guys his own size. The struggle against Shawn Porter says enough. Brook will crumble early in the fight.

It always bugs me how little emphisis people put on actually having beaten good opponents, then wondering why no one wants to fight good opponents. Exactly. Boxing fans are retarded. Let's say a new Russian/Eastern European fighter, Ivan Brakovic or whatever, starts fighting and looks good in knocking out a lot of bums, he will get respect and people will say "he can beat Froch, just look at him while he's fighting!", lol. Wilder's signature win, Stiverne, is better than any win on Golovkin's record and even if one disagrees with that, Wilder was travelling all the way to Russia to fight Povetkin, who is so much better than any Golovkin-opponent that it can't even be debated. We got two guys who are mainly knocking out a lot of bums, with Wilder having the better signature win, the better attempt at getting a better signature win AND a higher KO percentage. Yet, people bash Wilder and love Golovkin? Except for racism, then I simply see no logic behind it.

It always bugs me how little emphisis people put on actually having beaten good opponents, then wondering why no one wants to fight good opponents.