What if Gennady Golovkin was a boxer?

this my top 15 p4p, p4p should be ranked by resume 1. A. Ward 30-0(15) (175) 2. S. Kovalev 30-0-1(26) (175) WBA (Super), WBO, IBF 3. M. Pacquaio 58-6-2(38) (147) 4. G. Rigondeaux 17-0(11) (122) WBA (Super), Lineal 5. R. Gonzalez 45-0(38) (112) WBC, Ring, Lineal 6. T. Fury 25-0(18) (201+) WBA (Super), WBO, IBO, Ring, Lineal 7. T. Crawford 29-0(20) (140) WBC, WBO, Ring, Lineal 8. C. Alvarez 47-1-1(33) (154) 9. W. Klitschko 64-4(53) (201+) 10. C. Frampton 23-0(14) (126) WBA (Super) 11. G. Golovkin 35-0(32) (160) WBC, WBA (Super), IBF, IBO 12. A. Stevenson 28-1(23) (175) WBC, Ring, Lineal 13. T. Bradley 33-2-1(13) (147) 14. D. Garcia 32-0(18) (147) WBC 15. E. Lara 23-2-2(13) (154) WBA (Super) The top 5 can be switched around, what do you think Interesting top 10 but I have: 1- Gonzalez 2- Kovalev 3- Crawford 4- Golovkin 5- Ward 6- Rigondeaux 7- Fury 8- Frampton 9- Garcia 10- Lomachenko

I'm not a Golovtard, far from it. But I got to call it as I see it. I don't think prime Hopkins beats Golovkin and if you add the obvious ducks in his resume, he's definitely top 5. Even with his resume, his dominance over the division cannot be ignored. this my top 15 p4p, p4p should be ranked by resume 1. A. Ward 30-0(15) (175) 2. S. Kovalev 30-0-1(26) (175) WBA (Super), WBO, IBF 3. M. Pacquaio 58-6-2(38) (147) 4. G. Rigondeaux 17-0(11) (122) WBA (Super), Lineal 5. R. Gonzalez 45-0(38) (112) WBC, Ring, Lineal 6. T. Fury 25-0(18) (201+) WBA (Super), WBO, IBO, Ring, Lineal 7. T. Crawford 29-0(20) (140) WBC, WBO, Ring, Lineal 8. C. Alvarez 47-1-1(33) (154) 9. W. Klitschko 64-4(53) (201+) 10. C. Frampton 23-0(14) (126) WBA (Super) 11. G. Golovkin 35-0(32) (160) WBC, WBA (Super), IBF, IBO 12. A. Stevenson 28-1(23) (175) WBC, Ring, Lineal 13. T. Bradley 33-2-1(13) (147) 14. D. Garcia 32-0(18) (147) WBC 15. E. Lara 23-2-2(13) (154) WBA (Super) The top 5 can be switched around, what do you think

come on, I like gennady's style he is for sure entertaning but no way in hell is he top 5 p4p nor is he one of the greatest middleweights I'm not a Golovtard, far from it. But I got to call it as I see it. I don't think prime Hopkins beats Golovkin and if you add the obvious ducks in his resume, he's definitely top 5. Even with his resume, his dominance over the division cannot be ignored.

Would he still be fighting the same sh1t opposition..thats the only issue he really has man..sh1t fights

Golovkin is a top 5 p4p boxer and one of the greatest middleweights in history. Can't wait to see him in a good fight. come on, I like gennady's style he is for sure entertaning but no way in hell is he top 5 p4p nor is he one of the greatest middleweights

true boxing fans?? Yes, he's clearly great to watch, I don't see how you can argue otherwise unless you have some agenda going on.

A true boxer. The type who relies on his outstanding movement, crafty veteran tricks, head movement and defence, who doesn't rely on his overrated power like some unskilled caveman, who holds American citizenship, who listens to hip hop. You know, the type of boxer who I, a hard working but oppressed and discriminated citizen, can identify with. How would he do? What an idiotic Thread

Golovkin is a top 5 p4p boxer and one of the greatest middleweights in history. Can't wait to see him in a good fight.

I feel most true boxing fans like GGG. Agree it's mostly the trolls that fake the idea that they're a hardcore fan of the sport that dislike him, hating GGG is like hating Muhammad Ali perhaps its jealousy.

Hated by me. Loved by Larry Hated by Larry and Beercules but he'd have a very small fan pool much like Lomachenko.

Many of the biggest Golovkin haters called Adrien Broner the next Floyd Mayweather Junior. Let's not pretend they hate on Golovkin so much for actual boxing reasons. There are certainly reasons to criticize Golovkin, but that's not driving most of the hate. I don't like any fighter other than Cotto, Bradley, and Wlad so I knew Broner wasn't going to be the next floyd but i still crtisize golovkin,

A true boxer. The type who relies on his outstanding movement, crafty veteran tricks, head movement and defence, who doesn't rely on his overrated power like some unskilled caveman, who holds American citizenship, who listens to hip hop. You know, the type of boxer who I, a hard working but oppressed and discriminated citizen, can identify with. How would he do? Golovkin IS a boxer!... but a hard hitting one...

true boxing fans?? Many of the biggest Golovkin haters called Adrien Broner the next Floyd Mayweather Junior. Let's not pretend they hate on Golovkin so much for actual boxing reasons. There are certainly reasons to criticize Golovkin, but that's not driving most of the hate.

true boxing fans?? people who love the sport at the expense of any subjectivity. yes, he's not been moved perfectly, and the brook fight absolutely blows, but he's still the most avoided fighter in the sport and can't be held responsible for virtually every top contender ducking him. when they've stepped up he's knocked them out.

he'd probably win silver at the olympics, and gold at the world's in a non olympic year! wait..!

I feel most true boxing fans like GGG. true boxing fans??

I feel most true boxing fans like GGG. Not slick bruv---- never mind :)

I feel most true boxing fans like GGG.

you'd have to change his skin color for that

Hated by me. Loved by Larry you'd have to change his skin color for that