Right now I have Santa Cruz at number 8 pound for pound. I normally only rank them down to maybe the top 12 or so. I don't think Frampton is one of the 50 best boxers in the world pound for pound and no where near a top 10 pound for pound fighter. I can't say for sure Frampton isn't in the top 50 because there are so many top fighters I have never seen fight. I have seen far more than 10 fighters who I think are better than him. If Santa Cruz wins by impressive KO I might not raise him higher than I already have him because the 8th best fighter in the world should KO Frampton. If Frampton wins in good style I might put him about number 15 until he backed that up with another good win. If Frampton wins I would think I had Santa Cruz rated too high.
hahahaha....WTF XD
unfortunately he hasnt been able to fight a true elite fighter. But he has blown away good solid opposition, arent chumps hes been beating.
I guess our standards are just different, I see no "good solid opposition" on g strings resume.
GGG is a dominant destructive champion at middleweight, blowing away competition. 22 consecutive KO's against good opposition, what more do you want?
I want g string to actually fight at least one quality opponent before you and the other g string ball gaggers claim he is top 3 P4P, atg, etc. Butterbean crushed one chump after another too and was never even thought of as a p4p entrant. I know that's extreme and g strings opposition is better than Butterbeans was, but you see the logic.
Absolutely nothing special about g strings opponents, before or after he fought them.
Maybe scrape in at number 5 but no higher. Why are you and so many others so fixated on stepping up in weight. 'oh man **** destroying everyone at your weight, if you dont step up in weight you are nothing' you forget the guys 34, a lot of people step up not because they want to, its because they are growing and they have to
So Crawford with not one but two quality wins scrapes in at number five but g string with ZERO quality wins is in your top 3?
Right now I have Santa Cruz at number 8 pound for pound. I normally only rank them down to maybe the top 12 or so. I don't think Frampton is one of the 50 best boxers in the world pound for pound and no where near a top 10 pound for pound fighter. I can't say for sure Frampton isn't in the top 50 because there are so many top fighters I have never seen fight. I have seen far more than 10 fighters who I think are better than him. If Santa Cruz wins by impressive KO I might not raise him higher than I already have him because the 8th best fighter in the world should KO Frampton. If Frampton wins in good style I might put him about number 15 until he backed that up with another good win. If Frampton wins I would think I had Santa Cruz rated too high.
I don't follow your logic. You currently have LSC in Top10, but if Frampton moves up in weight and beats this Top10 P4Per, he maybe gets into your top15?
..And Frampton already has another good win. Scott Quigg is a clear top3 in his division.
Right now I have Santa Cruz at number 8 pound for pound. I normally only rank them down to maybe the top 12 or so. I don't think Frampton is one of the 50 best boxers in the world pound for pound and no where near a top 10 pound for pound fighter. I can't say for sure Frampton isn't in the top 50 because there are so many top fighters I have never seen fight. I have seen far more than 10 fighters who I think are better than him. If Santa Cruz wins by impressive KO I might not raise him higher than I already have him because the 8th best fighter in the world should KO Frampton. If Frampton wins in good style I might put him about number 15 until he backed that up with another good win. If Frampton wins I would think I had Santa Cruz rated too high.
If Frampton wins, I'll put him at 7-8. He already bead Quigg and if he moves up and takes LSC, that's P4P worthy IMO. LSC wont get into top10 if he wins.