dung beetle
They are like the dung beetle, HBO feed them sh*t fights and they eat it up.
Enjoy:
https://6legs2many.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/hand-with-dung-beetle-on-ball.jpg
Wait...didn't your guy fight the guy who keeps ducking brook? Lmao. gtfoh. People will come in droves to watch brook fight GGG in England. Not so much for khan
yes he did, and i stated from the first moment that fight was trash and a complete joke, i said that ,many times, fanboys cant say the same about ggg-brook, is just not into them...
THIS RIGHT HERE, today we found out who are the fans and who are the fanboys...
Wait...didn't your guy fight the guy who keeps ducking brook? Lmao. gtfoh. People will come in droves to watch brook fight GGG in England. Not so much for khan
"Shameless" is the word that keeps coming to mind. A lot of Golovkin fans are showing integrity by calling this how they see it and with the same criticism they gave Canelo. Others are just being shameless and killing any credibility they may have had.
THIS RIGHT HERE, today we found out who are the fans and who are the fanboys...
Lol at all Golovkin fans just quoting Natas these days rather than trying to make a point. He's too long winded and I skip most of his posts because of it. Regardless, you guys should be able to explain it yourselves.
Man, I'm able to explain myself. Why would I write again what NATAS already wrote two posts above you?
Also I explained myself a lot today. Don't behave like Larry or boobiesman, you're leagues above them.
Canelo had a lot of legit opponents at 160 and at 155. He chose the easiest route and fight Khan.
GGG tried to fight any Top mw. They all came to the press saying "I need more money I need more time etc". The same promoter from Eubank jr offered Brook because there was not an agreement with the Eubanks.
I wouldn't blame it on GGG. You would, I guess, ignoring all the context and all that has happened in the last 7 years in the MW division.
It's not shameless... it's explained below:
Lol at all Golovkin fans just quoting Natas these days rather than trying to make a point. He's too long winded and I skip most of his posts because of it. Regardless, you guys should be able to explain it yourselves.
"Shameless" is the word that keeps coming to mind. A lot of Golovkin fans are showing integrity by calling this how they see it and with the same criticism they gave Canelo. Others are just being shameless and killing any credibility they may have had.
It's not shameless... it's explained below:
Larry, stop acting like you don't know what the context of those discussions you had with those NSB posters :rofl: no one literally said Brook is as good as Leonard or Duran. You know that.
Most all GGG fans I've seen post today, including myself, don't like this fight at all. The difference here obviously is Golovkin tried to fight Canelo. He tried to fight Saunders. He tried to fight Eubank. None took the fight and k2 ended up taking Eddie Hearn's second offer in Brook.
No one here is saying this is the best fight possible for Golovkin or any of that, rather people are saying that after being rejected by all the other relevant middleweights they settled with Brook. Canelo, since you're comparing, actively chose to fight Khan when he could have fought anyone he wanted. He then dropped the belt rather than fight Golovkin, even though they made an agreement to fight Golovkin after his extension. If you want to be mad at someone, criticize Canelo, Saunders and Eubank and while we're at it, Jacobs for wanting 1.5 years.
I don't know what else was on the table for k2. I could think of several fights I'd rather see than Brook.
The Leonard - Hagler comparison is downright embarrassing. It's nothing like that fight.
Porter is a good win, he gave Thurman all he could handle and beat Broner and Alexander. But it's his only good win and only big name opponent.
When his best win is Shawn Porter, how far will the same damn fan group who crucified Canelo for fighting Khan go to flip this utter sh1t of a fight?
I know Larry, it's ****ing disgusting. It's a shame, and shoukd literally be a prosecutable crime. People should be thrown in jail for such actions. No joke.
"Shameless" is the word that keeps coming to mind. A lot of Golovkin fans are showing integrity by calling this how they see it and with the same criticism they gave Canelo. Others are just being shameless and killing any credibility they may have had.
When his best win is Shawn Porter, how far will the same damn fan group who crucified Canelo for fighting Khan go to flip this utter sh1t of a fight?
I like how you slipped jmm in there, like the comparison wasn't more ggg to mayweather than brook to jmm. There's not much difference between floyd vs jmm and ggg vs brook, regardless of where jmm was on the pfp list.