Resumes are given too much credit here.

In reality, resume does not do justice to how talented a fighter is, which looks like the only means of judging a fighter here. For example, BJS has win over Eubank and Andy Lee (two guys who would be the best win in GGG's resume), yet BJS would lose to GGG in the eyes of 99/100 experts. Same goes for Jacobs. A resume can never show your real quality or flaw, provided you have so many controversial decisions now a days. Is Canelo p4p a better fighter than Lara? No. Is Floyd's win over Manny any less historic despite Manny having 5 loses, two of them recently to Bradly and Marquez(By KO)? No. Because everyone knows Manny is a better fighter . Rigo apart from Donaire has no great name, people avoid him, doesnt make him any lesser and is clearly the best of the division despite having an inferior resume. And people know it. Same goes for GGG. You can't force a fight. In reality, you just need to see a fighter, how he performs, basically a critical eye test to see how good a fighter is/can be. IMO Resumes defines a mere 30-40% of a fighter not the other way around like given credit here on NSB. And that is the concept behind p4p list as well. If that wasnt the case, Danny Garcia would be in top 5 of every p4p list. But he isnt' because even after such a great resume people know he isnt of the highest calible p4p wise Same goes for Canelo, great resume, but all of them smaller lower division fighter, your internal instinct and brain knows he can't be top 5 p4p irrespective of his resume.