I had it 3-2 Canelo.
Even Khan's good rounds, 1 and 2 were hardly dominant.
Khan is the epitome of a "front runner"'he's effective for 2 or 3 rounds then it's a wrap.
It's ok for you lot, I had that idiot Barry Jones to try to ignore too. To be fair at first I thought Khan did well the first 5 rounds, but then on second viewing and after the emotion had died down, I watched it again the next day
I had Khan wining 1,2 . . Canelo 3 . . . Khan 4, Canelo 5 and 6 going Canelo's way too.
Khan still did pretty well, but the fight played out as many predicted.
Why do they act like Khan dominated? "Wishful thinking".
If Canelo wasn't supposed to be fighting GGG, a veil would be lifted off the eyes of many and they would suddenly know how to identify a body shot.
I predicted that Khan would look good in the opening rds and that people in the RBR thread would be going ape for Khan, saying Canelo was garbage. And, that's exactly what happened. I also predicted that Canelo would invest in body shots that would slow Khan and make him ripe for the taking. Said Kahn would start to slow in the 6th and get KO'd in the 7th, so I wasn't too far off.
Not that this one was hard to figure out. But, we still have people here in denial. If GGG didn't exist there would be a huge rally for Canelo. But, fans gotta have their heroes and villains....
Compubox isn't perfect but they are reasonable accurate. At least they are neutral. They just count punches and they don't give a damn how it comes out. Fans regardless of which fighter they are rooting for are seldom neutral and fair.
Thanks for that Larry. Numbers don't lie. The Canelo haters and Khan lovers will hate and dispute this. They will say Oscar bribed compubox. Canelo landed the same amount of punches as Khan in rounds 1 and 4 and landed more punches in the other 4 rounds. Khan didn't out score him in a SINGLE ROUND. Canelo outworked Khan by throwing 170 punches to Khan's 166 punches thrown. Canelo outscored Khan by landing 64 punches to 48 punches landed by Khan. Canelo was kicking Khan's ass and winning the fight long before he knocked him cold. There can be no doubt that the 64 punches landed by Canelo were harder punches than the 48 punches landed by Khan.
I had it about the same, but I felt that the 3rd and 4th were tossup rounds. Either way, Khan wasn't being robbed.
Thank you..thats all im saying...posters on here are acting like Khan was dominating or something..he was actually starting to get out boxed ..Canelo got closer and closer each round and Khan really was not landing much at all
Compubox doesn't mean ****. Your eyes tell you who won a fight, not some old guy hitting a button saying a punch landed.
You are the epitome of a casual fan
The stats i posted actually watched the fight in slow mo, 50 times and counted
There is a different stat for every fight
Its a inaccurate way to judge a fight.
Fact ever Pro even your favorite crack head Floyd Snr had Khan winning
Paulie, Atlas, Lennox, Garcia etc...and once again i had it very close when Khan got put to sleep he was no way in hell dominating ...
using compubox not some bullsh1t you posted sonhttp://s22.postimg.org/mfeggr7gh/box.jpg
Compubox doesn't mean ****. Your eyes tell you who won a fight, not some old guy hitting a button saying a punch landed.
You are the epitome of a casual fan
The stats i posted actually watched the fight in slow mo, 50 times and counted
There is a different stat for every fight
Its a inaccurate way to judge a fight.
Fact is nearly every Pro even your favorite crack head Floyd Snr had Khan winning
Paulie, Atlas, Lennox, Garcia etc...
Khan was up 4-1 in most people eyes an got knocked out
case closed
If counting punches is the way to score a fight, here are the Floyd/ Pac stats....according to the punch stats it was a "draw"
American website sat its leading commentators down to watch fight again
They decided to tally every punch and came up with startling statistics
Figures suggest the megafight could have been scored 114-114
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/05/11/21/2890FD0200000578-0-image-m-22_1431377239533.jpg
The conclusions here include:
1) The fight was far closer than the judges, especially Moretti, and most pundits perceived
2) Many rounds were exceptionally difficult if not too close to call.
3) The punch stats as counted in the heat of the night are profoundly suspect (one US commentator who had Pacquaio winning asked if they were compiled by ‘kids from the HBO and Showtime offices’ and was told ‘Yes.’)
4) Pacquiao’s claim that he had won the fight was reasonable, not outrageous as the in-ring interviewer implied.
5) If watching on television, maybe better to mute the sound commentary.
6) Mayweather is very wise to keep insisting on home-town advantage in Las Vegas, which benefits from the huge economic impact of his fights.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-3077424/The-punch-statistics-prove-Floyd-Mayweather-fortunate-beat-Manny-Pacquiao-
using compubox not some bullsh1t you posted sonhttp://s22.postimg.org/mfeggr7gh/box.jpg
check the round by round thread..i gave Khan the 1st 2 rounds the 3rd was a toss up and the 4th and 5th i had Canelo..but no rounds were dominate rounds imo
I had it about the same, but I felt that the 3rd and 4th were tossup rounds. Either way, Khan wasn't being robbed.