Any Richard Dwyer fans on here?

Why are guys so intent on hating on him? He offers unique takes from a gamblers perspective. If he wanted to win more than he lost he'd just put videos up when mayweather or GGG are fighting mandatories. The point is he tries to find edges on the bookies by looking at styles and breaking down fights. It's pretty rare that fans/even former boxers look at styles in fights so it's good that Dwyer is making that contribution.

Dwyer is great. He gives you a lengthy styles breakdown, then you just pick the opposite of his pick. Profit.

Check Hooks was tracking his bets in the fantasy betting forum for a while. He was losing at a pretty substantial clip. Listen to his videos for his breakdowns if you want. But if you're interested in following his betting advice, I'm interested in being your bookie.

Dwyer & Nacho >>> Everyone else

i like the guy, he is educated, articulate and thoughtful in his analysis. I do think he puts a lot of emphasis on the underdog but that is because he is doing it from a gamblers point of view. He had a few good predictions where people were writing him off (they can't all be true). i think he said Thompson over price, he had Fury over Klitschko and he also said Degale would rule the SMW division (that was years ago before Degale won anything major)

I like Dwyer. He overlooks a lot of intangibles, like if a fighter is shot to sh|t for instance (he hung on to Mundine way past his expiry date LOL), but he is good for the most part. He is also a guy on youtube who talks boxing that is not a fanboy.

I like some of his breakdowns but a lot of the time he's wrong. Right or wrong about fight results, the way he talks about boxing and fighters is interesting to me. Knowing fighters styles and previous fights is no guarantee of being correct in those predictions as we all know, but it can help other people form an opinion on a fighter or fights, sometimes change that opinion. I feel like I have a better understanding of things the more I listen to people like that tbh Maybe it's just filling my head with more nonsense???

Lmao. The videos I've watched he always talks sense. Opinions. What is your take on him? I've watched about 20 videos the last few months and he validates a lot of what I have been saying online for ages He always references fights when talking about something, and knows loads about fights and fighters from years ago, which means he is knowledgeable Imo. You think he's not? I like some of his breakdowns but a lot of the time he's wrong.

It's not that I don't think he's knowledgeable. He clearly understands boxing. He used to be......decent. Anymore he's just as biased as your average NSB poster. He pretty much always looks for a reason to tell you to bet on the black fighter. And his Fury pick doesn't look near as good, when you consider that he always picks against Klitschko. He likes to pick massive underdogs and then claim victory when he finally strikes one. From a betting standpoint, he's cringeworthy at best. I've been betting for 15 or so years. And to listen to him just irks me beyond belief. "Bet ______ by KO. Hedge with ________ straight" - but he NEVER mentions the odds. As if every single fight has a hedging opportunity, when in fact, very few actually provide one that makes any sense, with a chance to profit. You can't tell someone to bet "so and so" to KO Golovkin, hedged with GGG straight, without mentioning that GGG straight is like -5600 odds. His fight breakdowns, while sometimes decent, take forever to arrive at the point. His betting advice is god awful. Terrible. I get what you're saying. I bet a lot myself and he can be frustrating for the reasons you listed. I've always thought that was more because of the fact he has other channels and a website for the actual gambling side of things. Maybe he gets more in depth there, but never listened to those so I don't know. I do like his fight breakdowns though. Don't always agree with his conclusions, but the guy obviously knows his **** when it comes to boxing.

Well, I suppose this is just my first impressions and you have seen a lot more than I have so I'll believe you. The betting side I can't comment on really as I'm not a big gambler and haven't seen enough of him but I'd certainly take his breakdowns into account in close fights. I've just picked up a lot of things from what he's said which fits my views on certain fights and fighters. I'll have to watch more which isn't a problem for me ive been watching Dwyer for years: He is the GOAT in the YTBC, IMO. i cant vouch for his picks/gambling tho'

Love watching his videos. It's a shame he only has just under 8000 subs. He's so much better than anyone else in the YTBC. At least he is IMO.

You described, literally, the exact opposite of what Dwyer is. That fool picked Robert Guerrero to beat Mayweather. What the hell does he know about boxing?

It's not that I don't think he's knowledgeable. He clearly understands boxing. He used to be......decent. Anymore he's just as biased as your average NSB poster. He pretty much always looks for a reason to tell you to bet on the black fighter. And his Fury pick doesn't look near as good, when you consider that he always picks against Klitschko. He likes to pick massive underdogs and then claim victory when he finally strikes one. From a betting standpoint, he's cringeworthy at best. I've been betting for 15 or so years. And to listen to him just irks me beyond belief. "Bet ______ by KO. Hedge with ________ straight" - but he NEVER mentions the odds. As if every single fight has a hedging opportunity, when in fact, very few actually provide one that makes any sense, with a chance to profit. You can't tell someone to bet "so and so" to KO Golovkin, hedged with GGG straight, without mentioning that GGG straight is like -5600 odds. His fight breakdowns, while sometimes decent, take forever to arrive at the point. His betting advice is god awful. Terrible. Well, I suppose this is just my first impressions and you have seen a lot more than I have so I'll believe you. The betting side I can't comment on really as I'm not a big gambler and haven't seen enough of him but I'd certainly take his breakdowns into account in close fights. I've just picked up a lot of things from what he's said which fits my views on certain fights and fighters. I'll have to watch more which isn't a problem for me

Put it this way, he knows more about the sport than 99% of posters who frequent NSB.

Lmao. The videos I've watched he always talks sense. Opinions. What is your take on him? I've watched about 20 videos the last few months and he validates a lot of what I have been saying online for ages He always references fights when talking about something, and knows loads about fights and fighters from years ago, which means he is knowledgeable Imo. You think he's not? It's not that I don't think he's knowledgeable. He clearly understands boxing. He used to be......decent. Anymore he's just as biased as your average NSB poster. He pretty much always looks for a reason to tell you to bet on the black fighter. And his Fury pick doesn't look near as good, when you consider that he always picks against Klitschko. He likes to pick massive underdogs and then claim victory when he finally strikes one. From a betting standpoint, he's cringeworthy at best. I've been betting for 15 or so years. And to listen to him just irks me beyond belief. "Bet ______ by KO. Hedge with ________ straight" - but he NEVER mentions the odds. As if every single fight has a hedging opportunity, when in fact, very few actually provide one that makes any sense, with a chance to profit. You can't tell someone to bet "so and so" to KO Golovkin, hedged with GGG straight, without mentioning that GGG straight is like -5600 odds. His fight breakdowns, while sometimes decent, take forever to arrive at the point. His betting advice is god awful. Terrible.

You described, literally, the exact opposite of what Dwyer is. Lmao. The videos I've watched he always talks sense. Opinions. What is your take on him? I've watched about 20 videos the last few months and he validates a lot of what I have been saying online for ages He always references fights when talking about something, and knows loads about fights and fighters from years ago, which means he is knowledgeable Imo. You think he's not?

I like him :lol1:

Hi Richard. Welcome to NSB. lol, good one. I like to hear some of his breakdowns, some other are really bias, so its not bad but its not like I can hear him for a week.

Dywer is a legend

I heared he use to be ward lawyer or somthing like that...any truth to that? Pretty sure he's a lawyer, but I have no idea if he was ever Ward's.