Comments Thread For: Jean: Pacquiao Is Faster, Hits Harder Than Crawford

Well, you're free to think so. I'm just not a big writer (guess why), mostly here for the articles, always getting the latest news and I like the video trading block. Didn't know you can have several accounts, that'd be very easy to prevent. It's not that easy to prevent. Kids like you have access to several different smart devices at one time that all have different sattelite IP addresses. Kids like you get a new smart device wverytime you scratch your office. Good talk though.

Correction: "owned him in your first post.....***on your umpteenth account.***" Fixed it. Well, you're free to think so. I'm just not a big writer (guess why), mostly here for the articles, always getting the latest news and I like the video trading block. Didn't know you can have several accounts, that'd be very easy to prevent.

He said "Manny is faster and hits harder", implying Crawford was fast and hit hard which is the opposite of what you understood. Is reading really such a difficult task to boxing fans? It appears to me as 90% of all posts on boxingscene either have nothing to do with the topic or are pure nonsense. Maybe it's the low level of education of typical boxing fans, maybe it's related to the heritage of most users. I don't know what it is, it is annoying and makes the forums a pain in the ass. So do all the alts

pac is jeans sparring partner and he's likely never even landed on pac before.

I think the fix is in... Crawford will get the UD as long as he doesn't get completely dominated... Crawford will box like he did Prescott...probably lose every round but get the Tim Bradley gift decision..

crawford is really the best win pac can get coming off a floyd loss, id be surprised if they took that as a comeback fight.

Arum don't waste a good talent like Crawford, keep him undefeated, don't let him fight one of the current best. Bad business move. Terrance was getting hit by Jean.

Jean is just telling the truth. Pacquiao is really faster and stronger than crawford. 60% Pacquiao is still better than a 100% Crawford.

Okay....so you got knocked out by a guy who's slow and weak....? Hmmm..... No "slowER and weakER", all relative. However, Pacquiao is not the same guy as he was 5 years ago but he still is by no means a slouch and I believe he is still #2. No detrimental decline as a result of losing to Floyd

Owned him in your first post, lol. Correction: "owned him in your first post.....***on your umpteenth account.***" Fixed it.

He said "Manny is faster and hits harder", implying Crawford was fast and hit hard which is the opposite of what you understood. Is reading really such a difficult task to boxing fans? It appears to me as 90% of all posts on boxingscene either have nothing to do with the topic or are pure nonsense. Maybe it's the low level of education of typical boxing fans, maybe it's related to the heritage of most users. I don't know what it is, it is annoying and makes the forums a pain in the ass. Owned him in your first post, lol.

Manny v Crawford is a mouth watering fight....If Manny is serious this is the fight.

Okay....so you got knocked out by a guy who's slow and weak....? Hmmm..... He said "Manny is faster and hits harder", implying Crawford was fast and hit hard which is the opposite of what you understood. Is reading really such a difficult task to boxing fans? It appears to me as 90% of all posts on boxingscene either have nothing to do with the topic or are pure nonsense. Maybe it's the low level of education of typical boxing fans, maybe it's related to the heritage of most users. I don't know what it is, it is annoying and makes the forums a pain in the ass.

Go back to being PAC's sparring partner, less dangerous! :boxing: Not :sad6:

Okay....so you got knocked out by a guy who's slow and weak....? Hmmm.....