Can we agree in the last 5 years Floyd has been on a tear

I didn't make anything up. It's what I recall from when I was heavy on those threads. You can lie if you want to I'm not going to bother to check. And I responded ok to your post. You didn't say "who's beaten better opponents in the last 5 years", you said who's done better... and within the context of the thread title being "on a tear", that's Kovalev. I wouldn't describe what Floyd does as being on a tear. And that's a matter of opinion.. don't care if people agree or not. Crab.... that's how you nsb heads live. Perched somewhere waiting to take someone out of context so you can climb some virtual ladder. Who cares...... I'm still me and you still u. At the end of the day. You didn't accomplish anything. Now if you'll excuse me Ive got far more important people to attend to. You clearly don't have anything better to do, since you've been crying about embarrassing yourself for days. For the record, here's my first ever Broner related post, since you know you're so full of *****, you "decided" not to follow up on search for proof. I really hate Broner, but I have to admit I cracked up reading the article. I hope he gets worked again. That definitely sounds like a Broner fan to me. Dummy.

Yes, there is. You are a choir singing to yourself. The body of my posts as you so kindly quoted explains my position. I have ceded that on paper Floyd's resume is better, but that Floyd is more of a con man now than a fighter. And paper can be deceiving to a gullible mind. I prefer fighters. Always will. The most markable FIGHTER right now is Kovalev. Understand now? Sport? Keep being a spectator. Clone. I could show you more in a 9 minute sparring match than you have learned in the 4.2 years you have spent watching primarily Mayweather fights. It's called hands on experience. And you only have it when you have it. People that know my post history know I am head and shoulders above the average poster here when it comes to overall fight and martial knowledge. And that's just real, no conceit. You're keyboard warrior....you talk bs. You definitely don't know more about the sport than I do, evidence is all over this particular thread. Anyone with a brain would look at your kovalev comparison and laugh at your dumbass.....you've been owned time and time again.

Loooool. So why respond to me with something that wasn't the answer to my question? Sounds like a dumb move. "Keep saying I said things I didn't though" - Just like the entire back story you made up for me right? The Ls just keep on piling up for you, don't they? I didn't make anything up. It's what I recall from when I was heavy on those threads. You can lie if you want to I'm not going to bother to check. And I responded ok to your post. You didn't say "who's beaten better opponents in the last 5 years", you said who's done better... and within the context of the thread title being "on a tear", that's Kovalev. I wouldn't describe what Floyd does as being on a tear. And that's a matter of opinion.. don't care if people agree or not. Crab.... that's how you nsb heads live. Perched somewhere waiting to take someone out of context so you can climb some virtual ladder. Who cares...... I'm still me and you still u. At the end of the day. You didn't accomplish anything. Now if you'll excuse me Ive got far more important people to attend to.

It's my opinion that the people who say Floyd is a fraud DKSAB.

I never once said Kovalev beat better opponents. I said he has consistently won in more impressive fashion against good opposition. And to me, being on a tear more fits Kovalev than Floyd, who A. Seeks a prefight advantage every time out, and B. Has the corrupt establishment behind him. When he used to defense without clinching 1000 times his spiel was more bearable, but now it's not. I'll take an honest entertaining fighter over a crook every time. Keep saying I said things I didn't though. I'm pretty sure you are lying about your post history too but I can't be asked to check. Don't got time like that. Loooool. So why respond to me with something that wasn't the answer to my question? Sounds like a dumb move. "Keep saying I said things I didn't though" - Just like the entire back story you made up for me right? The Ls just keep on piling up for you, don't they?

This is the post you responded to. http://i.imgur.com/YMM5OEa.png Kovalev is a bull**** answer. Fail on your part. Dafuq are you talking about? Me? Pick Broner? I picked against him that fight, and I've actively rooted against him every time out and laughed more than most whenever he's got that work. You definitely have me confused with someone else because I definitely foresaw Maidana giving Floyd problems. Yet another fail on your part. Try again. I never once said Kovalev beat better opponents. I said he has consistently won in more impressive fashion against good opposition. And to me, being on a tear more fits Kovalev than Floyd, who A. Seeks a prefight advantage every time out, and B. Has the corrupt establishment behind him. When he used to defense without clinching 1000 times his spiel was more bearable, but now it's not. I'll take an honest entertaining fighter over a crook every time. Keep saying I said things I didn't though. I'm pretty sure you are lying about your post history too but I can't be asked to check. Don't got time like that.

http://bcgavel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/tumblr_md3p0xrgqy1r0z99do1_500.jpg

Over literalism at its finest. The question of the thread was who's been on a "tear". And being on a tear is obviously an ambiguous term, means different things to different people. Sorry floyd's victories as of late haven't been very inspiring. I'm glad they have been for you though. Go have a party. Invite all the Floyd toe lickers from this thread. Should be a grand soiree. This is the post you responded to. http://i.imgur.com/YMM5OEa.png Kovalev is a bull**** answer. Fail on your part. Indeed. Weren't you one of the guys picked Broner over Maidana? Wasn't I in all the Maidana Broner threads explaining why Broner was going to lose? Fast forward.. Booger. Wasn't you saying Floyd would beat Maidana easily and it wouldn't be a challenge? Wasn't I, conversely, in post after post explaining to the deaf dumb and blind why Mayweather would struggle against Maidana. Weren't you one of the scoffers of that notion? Yeah.. you have no independent knowledge. Back in line with the rest of the clones. I might throw you a bone out of pity every now and then. Dafuq are you talking about? Me? Pick Broner? I picked against him that fight, and I've actively rooted against him every time out and laughed more than most whenever he's got that work. You definitely have me confused with someone else because I definitely foresaw Maidana giving Floyd problems. Yet another fail on your part. Try again.

not an impressive resume and im not trollin none of those guys are hall of famers that were in their prime - that is not opinion, its fact so we can leave the emotion at the door and use this fact to show that its not an impressive resume 200 replies later and i just ethered the whole thread my work here is done Was Floyd in his prime?

more knowledgeable? . Indeed. Weren't you one of the guys picked Broner over Maidana? Wasn't I in all the Maidana Broner threads explaining why Broner was going to lose? Fast forward.. Booger. Wasn't you saying Floyd would beat Maidana easily and it wouldn't be a challenge? Wasn't I, conversely, in post after post explaining to the deaf dumb and blind why Mayweather would struggle against Maidana. Weren't you one of the scoffers of that notion? Yeah.. you have no independent knowledge. Back in line with the rest of the clones. I might throw you a bone out of pity every now and then.

WTF are you blathering on about now? I asked you a simple question. Name someone with a better resume in the last 5 years. You named Kovalev (lol once again), got that laughed off as ridiculous, and now you're admitting you were wrong, all while trying to sound more knowledgeable? Loooooooool. Over literalism at its finest. The question of the thread was who's been on a "tear". And being on a tear is obviously an ambiguous term, means different things to different people. Sorry floyd's victories as of late haven't been very inspiring. I'm glad they have been for you though. Go have a party. Invite all the Floyd toe lickers from this thread. Should be a grand soiree.

Yes, there is. You are a choir singing to yourself. The body of my posts as you so kindly quoted explains my position. I have ceded that on paper Floyd's resume is better, but that Floyd is more of a con man now than a fighter. And paper can be deceiving to a gullible mind. I prefer fighters. Always will. The most markable FIGHTER right now is Kovalev. Understand now? WTF are you blathering on about now? I asked you a simple question. Name someone with a better resume in the last 5 years. You named Kovalev (lol once again), got that laughed off as ridiculous, and now you're admitting you were wrong, all while trying to sound more knowledgeable? Loooooooool.

This has got nothing to do with "agreeing with each other". There just literally isn't any sort of logic you could ever apply to arrive at the conclusion you did, yet you somehow managed it. Loooool @ wisdom. Yes, there is. You are a choir singing to yourself. The body of my posts as you so kindly quoted explains my position. I have ceded that on paper Floyd's resume is better, but that Floyd is more of a con man now than a fighter. And paper can be deceiving to a gullible mind. I prefer fighters. Always will. The most markable FIGHTER right now is Kovalev. Understand now? bytch please....you know f*** all about the sport and you've proven it time and time again in this thread. kovalev has fought bums compared to floyd. 50 yr old hopkins is his best win. Sport? Keep being a spectator. Clone. I could show you more in a 9 minute sparring match than you have learned in the 4.2 years you have spent watching primarily Mayweather fights. It's called hands on experience. And you only have it when you have it. People that know my post history know I am head and shoulders above the average poster here when it comes to overall fight and martial knowledge. And that's just real, no conceit.

I'm not being conceited when I say, I've forgotten more than you will ever learn about the fight game. There are heads who see all the angles that see through Floyd's sad charade as of late. Ray Corso being one of them. Thing is, I used to be a big Floyd fan... Back when he was a fighter, and not a con man. But now he conducts himself, in and out of the ring, like a lying thief with no honor. Venerate him if you will. I will not. Impotent ud wins vs decisive demolition. A matter of taste I suppose. It's like all of you are a choir singing to itself. You think because a bunch of "Floyd people" agree with each other that it somehow validates you? It doesn't. I KNOW I have a valid point about this, and I don't need anyone to validate me. That's called wisdom. I keep my own counsel, and many of you should try it, maybe just for half a day, if it doesn't make your brains implode upon themselves. bytch please....you know f*** all about the sport and you've proven it time and time again in this thread. kovalev has fought bums compared to floyd. 50 yr old hopkins is his best win.

For the record I am not a Mayweather fan I don't even like the man, but I have a lot of respect for what he has accomplished in boxing.

I just watched a video of Roger Mayweather giving his take on the upcoming Cotto/Canelo fight and the guy sounded punch drunk he has a very limmited train of thought or he is just plain dumb sad. Floyd senior is just as bad or worse. So this makes me wonder if these two gentlemen are actually capable of training a world class fighter at this point in their lives, which leads me to conclude that Floyd's greatness as a fighter is bigger than we may have thought if he has been actually training himself for the last 5 years or more. Just my two cents not trolling here just an observation.

Guererro was P4P according to The Ring when he fought Mayweather. lets also not forget there was a time on nsb that people said floyd was ducking guerrero. think about that for a second if that doesnt show how ridiculous the hate is nothing will. people honestly thought if floyd didnt fight guerrero that he was ducking him

Since his return Floyd has won 2 titles at 154,a Ring title at 154 and a lineal title at 154..3 titles at 147,a Ring title at 147 and a lineal title at 147(not to mention beating Shane and not paying for that title which should be 4 titles) He has defeated 5 top 10 p4p fighters(agree or not Ring had them there) Mosley Jmm Canelo Guerrero Pacquiao World champions he defeated Mosley Canelo Maidana Cotto Pacquiao Ortiz (wont even mention Jmm) Now i am done.....Haters do your job not an impressive resume and im not trollin none of those guys are hall of famers that were in their prime - that is not opinion, its fact so we can leave the emotion at the door and use this fact to show that its not an impressive resume 200 replies later and i just ethered the whole thread my work here is done

I'm not being conceited when I say, I've forgotten more than you will ever learn about the fight game. There are heads who see all the angles that see through Floyd's sad charade as of late. Ray Corso being one of them. Thing is, I used to be a big Floyd fan... Back when he was a fighter, and not a con man. But now he conducts himself, in and out of the ring, like a lying thief with no honor. Venerate him if you will. I will not. Impotent ud wins vs decisive demolition. A matter of taste I suppose. It's like all of you are a choir singing to itself. You think because a bunch of "Floyd people" agree with each other that it somehow validates you? It doesn't. I KNOW I have a valid point about this, and I don't need anyone to validate me. That's called wisdom. I keep my own counsel, and many of you should try it, maybe just for half a day, if it doesn't make your brains implode upon themselves. This has got nothing to do with "agreeing with each other". There just literally isn't any sort of logic you could ever apply to arrive at the conclusion you did, yet you somehow managed it. Loooool @ wisdom.

Do yourself a favor help your boxing knowledge too while you're at it.....you are freaking delusional to even compare Floyd's resume to kov's resume. I'm not being conceited when I say, I've forgotten more than you will ever learn about the fight game. There are heads who see all the angles that see through Floyd's sad charade as of late. Ray Corso being one of them. Thing is, I used to be a big Floyd fan... Back when he was a fighter, and not a con man. But now he conducts himself, in and out of the ring, like a lying thief with no honor. Venerate him if you will. I will not. There is no argument you can make that suggest any win on Kovalev's resume is better then Floyds in the last 5 years period.... NONE.... Impotent ud wins vs decisive demolition. A matter of taste I suppose. Please, for the love of everything holy, stop embarrassing yourself. You and me both. I can't understand how anyone can look at both resumes, and arrive at the conclusion he did. It's quite perplexing. It's like all of you are a choir singing to itself. You think because a bunch of "Floyd people" agree with each other that it somehow validates you? It doesn't. I KNOW I have a valid point about this, and I don't need anyone to validate me. That's called wisdom. I keep my own counsel, and many of you should try it, maybe just for half a day, if it doesn't make your brains implode upon themselves.