Is Al Haymon hoping to improve boxing by getting everyone under his single banner? Is he simply weaseling his way into the boxing world and going his own direction with whoever he can get to fight on his platform? Is it his fault or HBO's fault for not wanting to do business with each other? Is Bob Arum and Goldenboy so h*ll bent on burying Haymon that they will not do business with him at any cost for the foreseeable future? I think we can all agree that having two ego maniacs like Arum and Haymon is bad for boxing. All I can say is we will never see the money making fights that should happen with these promotions at odds. With that being said, is competition and the absence of a monopolized sport under one promotion the natural flow of business in boxing? I mean it used to be Don King and Arum being at odds, but at least they would meet halfway. Perhaps the biggest dilemma is the two glaring differences between Arum and Haymon in regards to their business ethics. Haymon, a greenhorn, shady, 'good guy', using every trick in the book to preserve select fighters in his stable while putting entertaining fights on the back burner. And then you have Arum, a also shady, pretentious, mastermind creating stars through taking gambles on his stables fighters, focusing more on selling entertaining fights.
What are y'alls thoughts?
Thurman vs Khan may be huge, but not that huge.
Wilder vs Klichko could be huge, but I don't think it will happen any time soon.
Anything else? I just realized they don't really have many stars despite their numbers.
His end game has always been money. I dont think the health of the sport or the satisfaction of the fans really plays high on his priorities list. He is very good at convincing people the next big fight is right around the corner so they should pay for this tuneup right now.
Right now he is taking a cut out of all the pbc fights, where fighters are being payed 150% + what they normally would make.
He is taking 15% or more of their purses.
They are being paid from investment money he secured.
His end game appears to be to pocket as much of that hedge fund money as he can before they pull the plug on him.
Haymon does not understand that losing is part of the sport. He is not knowledgeable about the sport. He bases everything on the fact that Mayweather has a zero and is the biggest money maker in boxing. Because of that, he believes the most important thing is that a fighter remains unbeaten as long as possible.
Didn't think it was possible, but your silly Haymon hatred is causing you to actually make a bigger embarrassment out of yourself.
Don't really know why it's so difficult for Haymon to pit his top guys against each other when losing is part of the sport. It's not like it's the end of the journey for the losing guy.
This is the main issue and his supporters would rather ignore it.
Haymon does not understand that losing is part of the sport. He is not knowledgeable about the sport. He bases everything on the fact that Mayweather has a zero and is the biggest money maker in boxing. Because of that, he believes the most important thing is that a fighter remains unbeaten as long as possible.
Don't really know why it's so difficult for Haymon to pit his top guys against each other when losing is part of the sport. It's not like it's the end of the journey for the losing guy.
This is the main issue and his supporters would rather ignore it.
He had the right idea but the execution is failing. It doesnt help the guys he hand picked as the face of PBC in Broner, Garcia and Thurman are not impressing or losing. You are as good as your fighters
Well, we've seen his middle game -- showcase his top fighters by fighting inactive, semi-retired opponents. (Malignaggi vs Garcia is another glaring mismatch.)
We're hoping his end game would result in fans seeing his top fighters fight each other. Question is when?
You're probably right, it may not be a question of it he will get offers, it'll be how much.
But the "how much" is a pretty important part of this, especially given all the recent reports of decreasing cable subscribers.
The PBC is still about two and a half years away from the end of these "time buys", so it'll be interesting to see where some of the networks are when these "time buys" are over and Haymon starts asking for real money...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-04/disney-profit-beats-estimates-as-film-studio-parks-post-gains
Disney Falls as Revenue Misses, Cable Profit Outlook Darkens
http://www.thestreet.com/story/13256764/1/disney-dis-stock-slumped-on-espn-subscriber-losses.html
Disney (DIS) Stock Slumped on ESPN Subscriber Losses
If he doesn't execute well that will certainly effect how much those deals are worth. Another part of the equation is if he keeps spreading around or goes with an exclusive deal. Spreading it around keeps his competitors down but companies pay a premium for exclusivity.
Either way has it's faults because going exclusive opens up avenues that his opposition will be looking to fill, or if he takes less money that messes up how he can operate.
So that will be interesting to see how that plays out.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that if all the posters who used terms like "Gaymon", "Gayweather", "Pacroid", "Margacheato", "Kneeguel" & others that the overall average IQ of this place would shoot up dramatically. Also what are you guys, who use terms like this, 10 years old?says the weirdo who has a creepy obsession with pandas.have you been traumatized by pandas? get some therapy you nut job.
al gaymons plan is to destroy boxing while making as much money as possible.I would much rather boxing be killed off entirely than see gaymon have complete control.I hope pbc fails and all real boxing fans do too because nobody wants to see expensive mismatches.
Haymon has NO CONTRACTS TO SELL!!! The contracts Haymon has with fighters are PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS. Haymon actually works for the fighters as their ADVISOR. The fighters do not work for Haymon. Can you not understand this? It is a central fact that is at the center of all the complaints against Haymon. It is a conflict of interest for Haymon to be a fighter's defacto employer as the head of PBC while at the same time being an employee of that same fighter as his advisor.
If you want to see where the future of broadcasting boxing is really going to be, take a look at this...
http://bit.ly/1ITQEda
THAT is the future of broadcasting boxing, not television. Haymon missed the boat and is wasting hundreds of millions of dollars. I feel sorry for the people who will lose their money on PBC and will await the inevitable court case for mismanagement that is sure to come down the line.
That is a pretty interesting move by GBP/Ring.
I wondered where the announcement of "De La Hoya TV" earlier this year would lead, especially after seeing that DLH TV was going to be producing some GBP shows.
I would assume DLH TV may be producing the Estrella TV fights, with GBP making them available on Ring TV...similar to what Top Rank does with TopRank.tv when they show weigh-ins and undercard fights live.
This is taking it step or two further, using Ring TV, looking to get other promoters involved, and streaming past fights on demand.
GBP definitely has the back catalog of fights that will make this worthwhile for some fans who want to watch or re-watch past fights.
Hopkins-Stevenson didn't happen because Bernard Hopkins wanted to get 75% of the money, with the fight being staged in Montreal (Stevenson's home venue) and the bulk of the money coming off of Canadian PPV (Stevenson's home market). All that other talk was "after the fact" spin by Hopkins.
And Haymon has a pretty good eye for talent, Errol Spence standing out as a pretty much "no duh" choice.
You don't think much of Deontay Wilder, which is fine; that's your opinion.
Still, Wilder's WBC world heavyweight champion, BoxRec rates him #4/6 in the division, ESPN rates him #4, ********* rates him #2, TBRB rates him as their #4 heavyweight, Ring Magazine rates him #3, Boxing News rates him #3, Sky Sports rates him #3, and basically every other credible source has him rated in the top 5 at heavyweight.
When you think the guy's a bum, yet every other credible source rates Wilder as having real ability, maybe you're the one who's mistaken.
I'm going to stick with BHop's explanation on why he fought Kovalev instead of Superduck, rather than your "even longer after the fact" spin attempt.
Wilder is highly ranked because he holds the WBC belt and is undefeated. Povetkin is the only other top 5 HW he has a chance of beating, imo, so he might possibly hold that WBC belt for 2 more years before he has to face another mandatory.
But even if that happens, another 2/3 years of cherry picks like Molina is not going to turn Deontay into a star. Not with exciting young HWs like Joshua, Parker, White, and the Fury cousins contesting the belts Wlad now holds after he retires or loses.
ESPN is whole different kettle of fish, especially compared with NBC/NBCSN, CBS/CBS Sports/(Showtime), or Fox/Fox Sports. ESPN is more HBO/Showtime/Starz than it is Bravo/USA Network, tbh
Yes and no.
ESPN's monthly subscriber cost, when separated out, may be closer to HBO than some smaller channels, but for the most part, it's still bundled with other channels, and not sold separately, like HBO.
That was beginning to change slightly in some markets with streaming services like Sling TV, where it would part of smaller bundles, but we'll see if that changes...
According to The Journal, Disney reached a deal with Dish to cancel its agreement to include ESPN on Sling TV if more than 3 million Nielsen households or homes that count for the all-important Nielsen ratings got rid of ESPN after May 2014.
According to The Wall Street Journal's sources, this threshold has now been crossed.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cost-cutting-is-coming-to-espn-2015-7#ixzz3iy75QzZ0
As long as HBO is still mostly bundled, it is still propping up a lot of those other channels that you just listed....channels that may not do as well if they're no longer packaged with ESPN.
But how would ESPN do on it's own?
If pay TV providers were forced to sell channels a la carte, retail prices would skyrocket with ESPN costing in the ballpark of $30 monthly and the industry overall would lose half its revenue, or $70 billion, according to one Wall Street analyst.
According to Martin, only about 20 cable channels would survive in an a la carte world. Industry execs have repeatedly raised the specter of niche-oriented and minority-targeted channels becoming unsustainable in such a marketplace
With a la carte, ESPN's audience would shrink by about one-fifth, to 20 million super fan homes, and the cost of the network would rise to $30 monthly because ESPN would need to recoup lost subscriber fees and ad revenue, according to Martin.
http://variety.com/2013/biz/news/would-you-pay-30-per-month-for-espn-1200563396/
so you don't know but they are making 1 million per show? where did you get this info? i hope you didn't just make it up. that would be strange and creepy.
Two fights per show, containing anywhere from 20-24 rounds of action. Count the in-between round breaks, in addition to the time breaks between the fights/ to announce, the cards/etc and you're looking at 50 minutes of ad time to sell.
The $1m a show figure was simply a guess, yes; as I see it, it's an educated guess. $2.5m in fighter purses against selling the 50 ad minutes for $70k each (a paltry $35,000 per 30-second ad spot) and netting $3.5m in add revenue . You look at the fighter payouts for the SpikeTV/afternoon CBS and NBC shows being on a lower scale, and the NBC Sports/FS1 shows having a lower payout scale, and the BounceTV shows having an even lower payout scale, and the model is similar down the spectrum.
logic helps every once in a while.
They chose to become boxers with all the risks that come with it. Don't come crying to me if they get hurt in the ring. Formula One and other race drivers take their lives and the lives of all their competitors, not to mention track side fans and pit crews and officials, into their hands in every race and they do not race twice or three or four times per year either. Do you whine and cry about the risks they take? How about the number of football players with severe brain injuries from their years in the sport? Many end up committing suicide, many end up destitute.
NO ONE FORCED ANY OF THESE ATHLETES TO MAKE THE CHOICES THEY MADE FOR THEIR LIVES. They chose to enter these professions for the millions of dollars they will make over their careers. They chose to accept the risks along with the rewards. And they are damn well rewarded for it.
Maybe you should save your bleeding heart for the 7/11 clerk who works for minimum wage on the overnight shift who gets shot by some druggie trying to score his next hit.
this whole no one is making them do it crap give me a break. you should still have more respect for the fighters and less for the promoters. i agree i think fans do seem entitled these fighters are risking their lives they should make as much money as humanly possible while doing it
You're probably right, it may not be a question of it he will get offers, it'll be how much.
But the "how much" is a pretty important part of this, especially given all the recent reports of decreasing cable subscribers.
The PBC is still about two and a half years away from the end of these "time buys", so it'll be interesting to see where some of the networks are when these "time buys" are over and Haymon starts asking for real money...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-04/disney-profit-beats-estimates-as-film-studio-parks-post-gains
Disney Falls as Revenue Misses, Cable Profit Outlook Darkens
http://www.thestreet.com/story/13256764/1/disney-dis-stock-slumped-on-espn-subscriber-losses.html
Disney (DIS) Stock Slumped on ESPN Subscriber Losses
ESPN is whole different kettle of fish, especially compared with NBC/NBCSN, CBS/CBS Sports/(Showtime), or Fox/Fox Sports. ESPN is more HBO/Showtime/Starz than it is Bravo/USA Network, tbh
Like I said this is tiresome and you certainly have not taught me anything. Once again you are speaking English but you are still just talking negative drivel and I haven't even been that positive here. Like I said his end game is to sell out this venture which will include everything related to him.
Maybe it works great or maybe he goes bankrupt or anywhere on the continuum between.
You seem to have a problem with disagreement and taking things ten steps beyond what is said.
You are stuck on what you think, which makes your comments about learning very funny because you refuse to understand anything going the other way acting like you know everything under the sun in relation to the subject at hand.
One thing I have learned in life that someone so sure they can't be wrong, is more than likely wrong. You have yourself convinced this won't work out, and can't accept the other side of that it could in fact work out very well.
You getting angry, talking hyperbole and name calling doesn't make your case any more sound. Relax you will live longer~
Don't waste your time with Barcham; for whatever reason, he has it in his heart that PBC is destined to fail and he's not going to give up that thought until the day comes when Al Haymon and whatever network signs the main content deal, sit together for a press conference to announce the deal to the public.
it is what it is.