Rank your Wleterweights

Alexander is a world title holder at the weight and holds a win over Maidana who you rate highly and gave Mayweather hell in their first meeting. Doesn't that count for something? I'd agree if you mentioned Chaves, Thurman and Ali in the same breath, although Ali is levels below even those two. I agree with you with regards to Alexander and of the fighters mentioned he has clearly go the best achievements - hence him being on my list. The trouble with placing him arises with the fact that he has good wins and is a former world champions but has gone 1-2 in his last three fights. Clearly good, but not done much well recently.

Champion: Mayweather #1 Manny Pacquiao #2 Kell Brook #3 Bradley #4 Porter #5 Thurman #6 Maidana #7 Amir Khan #8 Devon Alexander #9 Guerrero #10 Rios/Chaves or someone like that- Left Marquez out because he's been inactive for more than a year. This and your reply to John Locke are on point. No way I'm putting Thurman over Brook, Bradley, or Porter.

So your criteria for JMM is that he has the best Welterweight win in years, which I agree with Yet you seem to use another for Brook/Khan. Based on Welterweight wins, Brook clearly has fought better competition - the Porter win alone trumps anything Khan has done at Welterweight. I don't really understand the logic there Khan beating maidana > brook beating porter. Both are WW now so the JWW argument doesn't really apply

Opinions should not over look objectivity, JMM hasn't fought in ages and lost to Bradley quite clearly. Brook beat a world titlist in Porter who many said was going to KO him. Chaves is a b level slugger and guerrero has done nothing of not since getting embarrassed by mayweather. Well, if brook were to fight Guerrero or Chavez I would then rank him higher. We have to wait and see who his next opponent is and the outcome of the fight.

The bottom three are really a matter of taste. Very hard to pick between Rios, Alexander, Chaves and Ali as none of them have clearly proven themselves to better than each other. The Alexander Chaves fight should help clear the bottom of the list up a little. Alexander is a world title holder at the weight and holds a win over Maidana who you rate highly and gave Mayweather hell in their first meeting. Doesn't that count for something? I'd agree if you mentioned Chaves, Thurman and Ali in the same breath, although Ali is levels below even those two.

Brook Mayweather Pacquiao Thurman Spence Bradley Porter Maidana Ali Chaves My choices are based on potential of what I believe. This tomato can fad ****e means nothing you can fight and beat poor fighters that doesn't mean you wont beat great fighters. I haven't added khan because he isn't a welterweight and doesn't fight true welterweights Alexander is as much, if not more of a welterweight than Guerrero. You're saying Brook has more potential than both Mayweather AND Pacquiao. What's Chaves potential based on? Errol Spence has more potential than Bradley, why do you feel that way?

1-)Mayweather 2-)Pacman 3-)Bradley 4-)Thurman 5-)Brook 6-)Khan 7-)Maidana 8-)Porter 9-)Alexander 10-)Chaves

Apart from the positions of Thurman and Rios, that's a good list, very good in fact. Just wish there's a round robin of fights between Brook, Khan and Bradley, with a second one between Porter, Maidana and Alexander/Thurman. The bottom three are really a matter of taste. Very hard to pick between Rios, Alexander, Chaves and Ali as none of them have clearly proven themselves to better than each other. The Alexander Chaves fight should help clear the bottom of the list up a little.

Brook Mayweather Pacquiao Thurman Spence Bradley Porter Maidana Ali Chaves My choices are based on potential of what I believe. This tomato can fad ****e means nothing you can fight and beat poor fighters that doesn't mean you wont beat great fighters. I haven't added khan because he isn't a welterweight and doesn't fight true welterweights That list is total AIDS.

On H2H skills, not resume 1. Floyd Mayweather 2. Manny Pacquiao 3. Timothy Bradley 4. Kell Brook 5. Marcos Maidana 6. Shawn Porter 7. Keith Thurman 8. Amir Khan 9. Devon Alexander 10. Sadam Ali

Brook Mayweather Pacquiao Thurman Spence Bradley Porter Maidana Ali Chaves My choices are based on potential of what I believe. This tomato can fad ****e means nothing you can fight and beat poor fighters that doesn't mean you wont beat great fighters. I haven't added khan because he isn't a welterweight and doesn't fight true welterweights

I'm kinda ranking them off of accomplishments/competition. JMM win over Pac has been the best WW win in years IMO. Plus if you notice the top 4 have pretty much all fought each other. Khan has the better resume out of Thurman/Brook imo also. Brook best win to date is Porter, which is solid. But don't get him in my top 5. However, I'm pretty sure he will be there in the next couple of years. Thurman has a good win over Chaves and Guerrero which puts him just above Brook. Again, just my opinion. So your criteria for JMM is that he has the best Welterweight win in years, which I agree with Yet you seem to use another for Brook/Khan. Based on Welterweight wins, Brook clearly has fought better competition - the Porter win alone trumps anything Khan has done at Welterweight. I don't really understand the logic there

1. Mayweather 2. Pac 3. Bradley 4. Brook 5. Khan 6. Maidana 7. Thurman 8. Porter 9. Rios 10. Alexander Apart from the positions of Thurman and Rios, that's a good list, very good in fact. Just wish there's a round robin of fights between Brook, Khan and Bradley, with a second one between Porter, Maidana and Alexander/Thurman.

1. Mayweather 2. Pac 3. Bradley 4. Brook 5. Khan 6. Maidana 7. Thurman 8. Porter 9. Rios 10. Alexander

I'm kinda ranking them off of accomplishments/competition. JMM win over Pac has been the best WW win in years IMO. Plus if you notice the top 4 have pretty much all fought each other. Khan has the better resume out of Thurman/Brook imo also. Brook best win to date is Porter, which is solid. But don't get him in my top 5. However, I'm pretty sure he will be there in the next couple of years. Thurman has a good win over Chaves and Guerrero which puts him just above Brook. Again, just my opinion. Opinions should not over look objectivity, JMM hasn't fought in ages and lost to Bradley quite clearly. Brook beat a world titlist in Porter who many said was going to KO him. Chaves is a b level slugger and guerrero has done nothing of not since getting embarrassed by mayweather.

better list than most but surely Brook has to be higher than JMM now and Khan and Thurman? Why'd you rank him lower? I'm kinda ranking them off of accomplishments/competition. JMM win over Pac has been the best WW win in years IMO. Plus if you notice the top 4 have pretty much all fought each other. Khan has the better resume out of Thurman/Brook imo also. Brook best win to date is Porter, which is solid. But don't get him in my top 5. However, I'm pretty sure he will be there in the next couple of years. Thurman has a good win over Chaves and Guerrero which puts him just above Brook. Again, just my opinion.

Mayweather Pac Bradley Jmm Khan Thurman Brook Maidana Porter Ali better list than most but surely Brook has to be higher than JMM now and Khan and Thurman? Why'd you rank him lower?

Mayweather Pac Bradley Jmm Khan Thurman Brook Maidana Porter Ali

Bradley does have the better resume, but I think he's clearly declined, too small and I think Thurman beats him. Since Provodnikov (a fight I thought Bradley lost) he has looked faded and vulnerable. Pacquiao beat him easily, Vargas, who has Malignaggi power, put him on queer street with a single punch, a close fight with Chavez....Yeah, I rate Thurman higher at this stage. Vargas landed a good shot, that's that. Bradley won almost every round preceding that. You're rating Thurman on what may be, I'm rating Bradley on what has been and what is.

Bradley hast he better wins...KOing Karass means nothing at the time they fought (thurman that is). Bradley does have the better resume, but I think he's clearly declined, too small and I think Thurman beats him. Since Provodnikov (a fight I thought Bradley lost) he has looked faded and vulnerable. Pacquiao beat him easily, Vargas, who has Malignaggi power, put him on queer street with a single punch, a close fight with Chavez....Yeah, I rate Thurman higher at this stage.