Amir Khan Talks Brook, Mayweather and Thurman

Khan has balls. He wants the hardest fights.

"there could be the winner of the broner vs Porter fight" Oh god

There's not much to say about Khan any longer. He's completely deluded. The only one that mentions Khan's name alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao is himself :lol1: When Mayweather was asked about Khan last week he looked at the interviewer like: Khan who?

how annoying that he speaks in the 3rd person... as ever, completely contradictory talking levels. brook beat porter, who just beat broner, a guy khan was wanting for his last fight!?!?!? true that it doesn't prove brook would then beat khan, but there on the same level for their best recent ww win. as for begging for a Bradley fight, how full off s#it is this guy allowed to be without being called out for it!!! he ducked the Bradley fight, tried to say his camp didn't tell him... man would be firing people if that were even slightly true

"Mys name gets mentioned with guy like Mayweather, Pacquiao". Lol deluded, only you mention your name with them and become a joke when you do.

I don't have time to read what Khan has to say. He could have and should have fought Thurman or Brook in his last fight if he is as good as he claims to be. He is afraid to fight either of them and that seems pretty obvious. Now he says Mayweather and Pacquiao should man up and fight him. He should have fought Brook or Thurman because a win over either of them would have earned him the right to challenge Mayweather and Pacquiao. Instead he fought Algieri who was coming off an incredibly one sided loss to Pacquiao. Khan cherry picked Algieri and then had his hands full and did lots of running and holding. Khan struggles with guys like Diaz and Algieri. Brook and Thurman would knock Khan out so team Khan will never fight them.

In a latest interview Amir Khan discusses in more depth his reasons behind not fighting Kell Brook and his thoughts on a Thurman fight. The Mayweather subject is briefly brought up but there is nothing new here! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc :thinking: http://www.atlasfamilychiropractic.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/dizzy.jpg

The Brook fight would be his biggest payday and Brook has a world title. That's reason enough to fight him. yep.......

Provodnikov and Pacquiao beat everyone Brook has faced. (Porter may outbox Provodnikov). So hypejob world champion Algieri has fought better opposition than Kell Brook so stop whinging. I didn't call Algieri a "hypejob". Khan is saying he would get no credit for beating Brook because people would call him a "hypejob". What credit was he expecting to get from beating Algieri? And he looked like turd just to top it all over.

He lost once before to the fighter of the decade, hardly a flop is he... He flopped on the floor 6 times at elite level. So it's better to beat a guy who flopped at elite level than a guy who is a "hypejob" who you say has never been proven at that level? Even though Khan said that Brook had "proved himself 100%" after the Porter fight :lol1: Rough times for the Khanturds.

Queen Contradiction doing what she does best at the moment - making a tit out of herself. "Kell Brook is begging to fight me" "I think Kell Brook should be fighting someone like Bradley who refused the fight against me when I was begging for the fight against him" :lol1: What an idiot. Genuinely is a dumb guy. :rofl: Funny thing is, he was never this outspoken in his early years. Understandable though. As a young fighter, you dont go shouting your mouth off. Since he's gone to America.. he's seen what the fighters do over there. Floyd, Broner, Malignaggi, Bradley and he's thinking, "Man, I need to be like that" Problem is, he hasnt got 2 brains cells to rub together and everytime he opens his mouth, he ends up overspeaking on something, saying something he shouldnt have, putting his big foot into his own mouth once again, contradicting himself, lying, or just exxagerating the truth. Once again, what a clown :rofl:

So instead of beating a "hypejob", he'll fight Algieri's who was a complete flop at elite level. Yep that's better for his legacy! Provodnikov and Pacquiao beat everyone Brook has faced. (Porter may outbox Provodnikov). So hypejob world champion Algieri has fought better opposition than Kell Brook so stop whinging.

He lost once before to the fighter of the decade, hardly a flop is he... Brooktards struggle with logic.

So instead of beating a "hypejob", he'll fight Algieri's who was a complete flop at elite level. Yep that's better for his legacy! He lost once before to the fighter of the decade, hardly a flop is he...

He's right in the sense that if Kell loses after Amir or Mayweather beat him then they will say he was a hypejob anyway. Kell needs a couple more big tests/names. So instead of beating a "hypejob", he'll fight Algieri's who was a complete flop at elite level. Yep that's better for his legacy!

Yeah sorta like the way hype job Khan was being dissed after he got KO'd by Bredis Prescott lol losing to Mayweathers nothing to hang your head about anyway. Losing to Amir without at least wobbling would be pretty humbling though... Exactly but boxing fans are fickle and the win will not mean much unless Kell bounces back big time.

He's right in the sense that if Kell loses after Amir or Mayweather beat him then they will say he was a hypejob anyway. Kell needs a couple more big tests/names. Yeah sorta like the way hype job Khan was being dissed after he got KO'd by Bredis Prescott lol losing to Mayweathers nothing to hang your head about anyway. Losing to Amir without at least wobbling would be pretty humbling though...

Queen Contradiction doing what she does best at the moment - making a tit out of herself. "Kell Brook is begging to fight me" "I think Kell Brook should be fighting someone like Bradley who refused the fight against me when I was begging for the fight against him" :lol1:

He's right in the sense that if Kell loses after Amir or Mayweather beat him then they will say he was a hypejob anyway. Kell needs a couple more big tests/names.