Amir Khan: "Money Doesn't Matter Anymore. It's All About The Legacy." [video]

And Khan struggled with, was knocked down by and ran from a blown-up lightweight in Julio Diaz. :lol1: As well as looked like crap and was running from a guy Pacquiao absolutely smashed to bits. Then goes on to say Mayweather chose the easy option in fighting Pacquiao without a trace of irony. You literally couldn't make it up. "Algieri could have won against Pacquiao in that shape doe" The same who got a draw against Porter in their first outing? Ummm you know the win that puts Brook right behind Floyd. I already told you on your wall how cringe the stuff Khan says can be even for me, so I don't see the point of bringing that up.

I think we can all admit Brook's resume is very weak compared to A Mere Con's resume however this fight would add to Con's legacy. He gets the chance to shut up his domestic rival and his promoter and cement his place as the best WW in the UK. Sure he can do all that after Floyd, but what's the point? It shows that he's clearly afraid of losing to Brook and he has doubts about his own ability, hence why his poor choice of opponents since Danny Garcia, So why go after the p4p no 1 if you're afraid of the rest of the guys in the division. Why not clean up and then go after Floyd.

Outside of Porter who the hell has Brook beaten? The OP is about Khan, your 'boss man'. Why do idiots like you always deflect criticism of Khunt Khan by asking about Brook? Khan's legacy is that he is a chinny duck.

Khan's legacy - the weakest chin and most deluded mind in boxing history.

Khan vs Brook is a good fight to be made down the line, I'd guess within 18 months the fight happens. By that time it would have built up even more, Brook should have a few more names under his belt, and Khan will continue to add to his list of names he already has, so public anticipation for the fight will be sky high. It's going to be edge of the seat stuff, looking forward to it. They are two talented boxers with a genuine rivalry so the fight is going to be well worth waiting for.

Khan fanboys. Smh. The worst.

Khan must be delusional to make some of the statements that he does .if I thought he would be competitive with floyd id be interested in watching that fight .he needs to beat brook and or Thurman to deserve it or to get people to want to see it .i.m.o

So, much quality, so much that the kid has one name that stands out out of 35 wins. Brook is good, but he too had his struggles with a fringe contender in Carson Jones of all, but I'm guessing you only started watching him since, Porter? And Khan struggled with, was knocked down by and ran from a blown-up lightweight in Julio Diaz. :lol1: As well as looked like crap and was running from a guy Pacquiao absolutely smashed to bits. Then goes on to say Mayweather chose the easy option in fighting Pacquiao without a trace of irony. You literally couldn't make it up. "Algieri could have won against Pacquiao in that shape doe"

Shawn Porter is overrated. He drew against Julio Diaz, a guy who Khan beat by UD. Porter's not in the same league as Maidana, or four-time champs Judah and Barrera. If that's the only win that Brook fans can brag about, and even that was just a very close MD win, then it only goes to show just how terrible Brook's resume is. Is that why Porter beat Alexander comfortably? :lol1: Seriously, how long have you been watching boxing? Or do you only watch Khan fights? Between this and using Compubox as Gospel, it's clear you don't have a fuking clue See him edit out Alexander :lol1: What a total tool. Follows the same Khan nutbaggery as Box-Office who also tries to convince me Alexander was a better win than Porter. It's literally the most retarded thing you could ever say.

What is this, Khan's reality show? , is he actually talking to the media every day?. Is it a compulsion? He obviously can't shut his mouth , no matter what :D. Sometimes people go too hard on him, but he is fishing for it. "it's all about the legacy", by the way he speaks one who'd assume he's the second coming of SRR. Khan should fight Broner , Amir "about legacy" vs " Adrien "about billions".

I mean, I don't see Brook continuously eating right hands in the manner that Khan did against Algieri, I don't see him eating lefts repeatedly against Julio Diaz, you would think that it's easy to spot the distinct difference in quality between Brook and Khan but I'm not even sure I know who I'm talking to in these forums Not sure if they're simply looking to get a reaction or no offense, that stupid. So, much quality, so much that the kid has one name that stands out out of 35 wins. Brook is good, but he too had his struggles with a fringe contender in Carson Jones of all, but I'm guessing you only started watching him since, Porter?

And outside of Ruslan who the hell has Algeri beaten? Outside of Porter who the hell has Brook beaten?

Shawn Porter is overrated. He drew against Julio Diaz, a guy who Khan beat by UD. Porter's not in the same league as Maidana, two-time champs Malignaggi and Alexander, or four-time champs Judah and Barrera. If that's the only win that Brook fans can brag about, over a very close MD, then that only goes to show just how terrible his resume is. Is that why Porter beat Alexander comfortably? :lol1: Seriously, how long have you been watching boxing? Or do you only watch Khan fights? Between this and using Compubox as Gospel, it's clear you don't have a fuking clue

The reality is that one win is better than any Khan win in 5 years, if not any win in Khan's whole career. When has Khan beaten an unbeaten champion coming off two destructive performances against pretty good opposition? It's never happened. Wins over the likes of Judah, Malignaggi, Alexander, Collazo, Kotelnik etc are GOOD wins, they're not better than good. Shawn Porter is better than all of those guys - The only win on Khan's resume that would rival Porter, is Maidana. Shawn Porter is overrated. He drew against Julio Diaz, a guy who Khan beat by UD. Porter's not in the same league as Maidana, or four-time champs Judah and Barrera. If that's the only win that Brook fans can brag about, and even that was just a very close MD win, then it only goes to show just how terrible Brook's resume is.

Brook barely beat porter guys It wasn't a domination Brook has a really weak resume Most people on this forum thought he won quite comfortably. 9-3 or 8-4 were thrown around. And he was a massive underdog in that fight. Considering Khan barely beat Algieri, I don't really think that should be brought up.

Brook barely beat porter guys It wasn't a domination Brook has a really weak resume

I mean, I don't see Brook continuously eating right hands in the manner that Khan did against Algieri, I don't see him eating lefts repeatedly against Julio Diaz, you would think that it's easy to spot the distinct difference in quality between Brook and Khan but I'm not even sure I know who I'm talking to in these forums. Not sure if they're simply looking to get a reaction or no offense, that stupid. Khan's last performance wasn't that good - but he performed well against Collazo and Alexander. Some people will bring up Brook-Jones I, but in my opinion Brook has improved a lot since that fight. And people forget he was putting up a demolition job on Jones in the first 6-7 rounds, but he gassed after not making the weight right. Brook vs Khan is an interesting match-up and a genuine 50/50 fight imo. I would back Brook to win because I think Khan's punch resistance has went to absolute shts, but if he comes in great shape, then it's a good fight. Neither really deserves Mayweather, especially not Khan coming off a bad performance. If I was Mayweather I'd postpone my last fight to May and wait for the actual challenger. Say Brook/Khan/Thurman beat Pacquiao in November or December. Then you have your pick. Or of course, if they fought each other.

Lmaoooooooooo

The reality is that one win is better than any Khan win in 5 years, if not any win in Khan's whole career. When has Khan beaten an unbeaten champion coming off two destructive performances against pretty good opposition? It's never happened. Wins over the likes of Judah, Malignaggi, Alexander, Collazo, Kotelnik etc are GOOD wins, they're not better than good. Shawn Porter is better than all of those guys - The only win on Khan's resume that would rival Porter, is Maidana. I mean, I don't see Brook continuously eating right hands in the manner that Khan did against Algieri, I don't see him eating lefts repeatedly against Julio Diaz, you would think that it's easy to spot the distinct difference in quality between Brook and Khan but I'm not even sure I know who I'm talking to in these forums. Not sure if they're simply looking to get a reaction or no offense, that stupid.

The reality is that Brook at the moment only has a single notable win in his entire career and that's against Shawn Porter. Brook will improve his resume though, he's got genuine talent. My guess is that Khan vs Brook happens within the next 24 months. The reality is that one win is better than any Khan win in 5 years, if not any win in Khan's whole career. When has Khan beaten an unbeaten champion coming off two destructive performances against pretty good opposition? It's never happened. Wins over the likes of Judah, Malignaggi, Alexander, Collazo, Kotelnik etc are GOOD wins, they're not better than good. Shawn Porter is better than all of those guys - The only win on Khan's resume that would rival Porter, is Maidana.