Higher on P4P list: Golovkin or Kovalev

Kovalev a little higher

Kovalev and it's an easy choice for me. Yeah Kovalev by quite a distance. I think I put him 5th after the Pascal whooping. Golovkin maybe 8-10. Kovalev is doing what GGG does to guys except the guys Kovalev is fighting are all top guys in their division. GGG is very avoided though.

I guess I'm one of the few picking GGG. Both a high P4P right now, but I feel like GGG has the better skill set. Kovalev is maybe a more well-rounded fighter and definitely more defensively sound, but I think GGG is more versatile in his attack. Kovalev has better resume too. But going by skills, I'm going wth Gennady.

Kovalev has fought better competition. GGG gets the headlines but Kovalev has done more.

GGG is my favorite fighter but right now I would put Kovalev higher because his resume is definitely better. Whenever big names start to man up and get in the ring with GGG he will move higher up the list and be ranked better than Kovalev IMO.

Kovalev easy. Golovkin has to actually beat some one. Not just get hyped up by hbo and the fan boys

As much as I like Golovkin, I have to give it to Kovalev. Better Opposition.

Golovkin is the better fighter imo. Lack of resume only comes as result as other fighters ducking him Golovkin higher on mine They both top 10 and are both are gonna be extremely hard to beat

Without hesitation, Kovalev. Based off the strength of Pascal and Hopkins alone.

I would say Kovalev. Both guys have been dominant but Kovalev has beaten the better competition.

Krusher...EASILY!!!! better resume...looks to be the fighter with more tools...seems to me to be the better fighter of the two....Krusher EARNED the hype and praise...he's LEGIT as a fighter but as a person, he's a prick!!

man if u have either one on ur list ur pretty mnych not very nowledgeable to boxings current landscaper.,but i will say,,since kovelve beat bhop he should be a lil highter Who's in your top 10? I would be interested in hearing the 10 guys you think are more accomplished than Kovalev. Anyway, beating Hopkins and Pascal puts Kovalev above GGG in my eyes. I think Kovalev is probably the better boxer too as he's shown he can fight a very poised and disciplined fight.

Kovalev easily, Golovkin might be better but has no where near the resume. Kovalev has two signature wins against BHOP and Pascal. Also some of his other wins (Cleverley, silkah and campillo) are about equivalent to GGG's wins. Can't blame GGG though, can't fight big names if they are all scared

Kovalev easily,resume is far better

Kovalev and it's an easy choice for me.

Kovalev obviously. Better skillset, fought and beat better competition.

Kovalev has proven his worth.

Easily Kovalev. He might be a slightly better fighter overall. I've seen more versatility, even if he isn't as excellent at any one aspect as Golovkin is at cutting off the ring.

Both are in the 7-10 range. I'd have to sit down and actually make a list to see who's higher