Could Kell Brook use his Reach and Size to beat Manny Pacquiao

4 years to be exact. I just never made an account. I know that you pick any fighter thats going against pacquiao and any rican, you always pick the opponent. Very biased poster, always rooting for blacks, makes stupid predictions and stupid threads like this one. You are just a moron, honestly. IQ wayyyy below average, just like floyds I root for Danny Garcia. He is Rican. I root for GGG, he is not Black. I root for a lot of Japanese fighters, your theory is disproven. My favorite fighters though are Broner, Ward, and Mayweather.

You talk as if you been here for a while. 4 years to be exact. I just never made an account. I know that you pick any fighter thats going against pacquiao and any rican, you always pick the opponent. Very biased poster, always rooting for blacks, makes stupid predictions and stupid threads like this one. You are just a moron, honestly. IQ wayyyy below average, just like floyds

yes, i think

Kell's jab wouldn't be good for Manny, he'd get countered all day and maybe even stopped. Manny isn't the same fighter as he was in his PED days.

Anyone who didn't score the fight 118-110 or 117-110 for Mayweather is on drugs. Moretti had the correct scorecard. You, Good Sir, are a Jabroni. So then two judges and most media were on drugs - http://mmadecisions.com/decision/6144/Floyd-Mayweather-vs-Manny-Pacquiao 116-112 was a much more common score than 118-110. More people scored Mayweather 115 or 116 than had 117-119.

I definitely think that Kell could use his size and reach to beat Pacquiao. Mayweather showed everyone how one can use their size and reach to overwhelm and beat Manny Pacquiao. Does NSB think Kell Brook could do that. I honestly see Manny Pacquiao and Shawn Porter as very similar fighters, both are very wild, and Kell was able to tame the wild Shawn Porter, I think he could tame the Wild Manny Pacquiao, and if Pacquiao decides not to be wild in this fight, I think Kell can just outbox him. Because Kell is the Champ, Pacquiao and Roach's catchweight request will be rejected by Brook.I say no because what troubled Pac the most against Mayweather was not his size but his speed and that was the biggest disparity in their bout. Pac has challenged wider, longer, stronger and slower opponents like Kell Brook before and has defeated them all. However, Floyd was the quickest fighter Manny has ever faced and Brook is nowhere near as fast or quick as Mayweather.

I'd favour Pacquiao strongly. Kell is flat footed and stiff and he will have legit problems with Manny's speed and explosiveness. His jab could pose an issue but Manny can counter a jab fairly well, and Brook doesn't have the reach or speed that Floyd does. Marquez is flat footed as well and he gave Pac 4 good fights. Pac is a hesitant fighter now, he's not the animal he once was. Once he feels Brook's power he will make sure he doesn't get reckless and a part of what made Pac so great was that bit of recklessness in his game, that relentless aggressive style. Pac at his best would beat Kell, but this version of Pac? I'm not sure. I'd be 55-45 in favour of Kell.

You need a very quick touch jab against Pacquiao and you also need to be able to get into position fast enough, all whilst being able to shoot on the fly. Brook just doesn't possess any of that. On top of that Brook's chin is still highly questionable and his conditioning has failed him before. I'd favor Pacquiao in this one.

I'd favour Pacquiao strongly. Kell is flat footed and stiff and he will have legit problems with Manny's speed and explosiveness. His jab could pose an issue but Manny can counter a jab fairly well, and Brook doesn't have the reach or speed that Floyd does.

Brook has the style to cause Manny problems for sure. Pac would have a very hard time getting past Kell's jab, especially this past prime, hesitant version of Pac. He's just not the same fighter anymore, I would have to favour Kell at this point. It's a super fight though, one of the best that can be made at 147.

he is still the guy who mopped the floor with timothy bradley, though. i give brook a good chance and always would have because i think his style is anathema to pacquiao's and he has a significant size advantage to boot, but he's not as adaptable as floyd so i don't think he would be able to replicate a shut-out and he'd probably face some shaky moments Mopped the floor with Bradley? I don't recall that happening. Anyway, Bradley would get it from Brook too. Guaranteed. And he has no firepower to go back with and still tagged Pacquiao a lot. Brook doesn't need to replicate Mayweather. That's just one way of beating Pacquiao. I'm telling you now, Brook would shoot the jab-left hook against Pacquiao all night and finish him with a right hand and it would be Pacquiao's last fight. He wouldn't get any credit for it though, just as Floyd isn't getting much credit for his win. Either he's going to be too old or he's just come off an injury or something. Brook would beat him either way. Too big, too strong and too accurate.

I think Kell has the tools but lacks experience to beat Manny.

Who cares about their resumes when Pacquiao is 36 years old? He's not the guy that fought Oscar or Cotto. That guy is gone and will never return. he is still the guy who mopped the floor with timothy bradley, though. i give brook a good chance and always would have because i think his style is anathema to pacquiao's and he has a significant size advantage to boot, but he's not as adaptable as floyd so i don't think he would be able to replicate a shut-out and he'd probably face some shaky moments

Nope. Pac has beaten plenty of opponents with longer reach and bigger size. Kell Brook is too slow and flat-footed to bother Pac.

UNTIL THE KO? Nah. I had Murray up 3-0 until he got dropped, then GGG won every single round after that. I also didn't say Bute dominated Froch. He was winning most of the first four rounds until getting caught every time in the last-minute. The 5th he had nothing going on. How about when you said Margarito hits harder than Trinidad :lol1:

UNTIL THE KO? Nah. I had Murray up 3-0 until he got dropped, then GGG won every single round after that. I also didn't say Bute dominated Froch. He was winning most of the first four rounds until getting caught every time in the last-minute. The 5th he had nothing going on. OK that's equally crazy. There's no single way you can give those guys any solid rounds in any of these fights in which they were both totally manhandled from start to finish. A step too far? U talking abt the great Manny PAcquiao here my man. LOL a step too far?? Come on man. Floyd is a top10 ATG and now Brooks is a step too far for another ATG in MAnny? Im not saying Brooks doesnt have chance, cause at this point in Mannys career he sure does, but a step too far? :bounce: But I'm not talking about the great Manny Pacquiao. I'm talking about 2015/2016 Manny Pacquiao. He's not the same guy. I said this before the Floyd fight, that just cemented my prior belief. Floyd is not top 10 ATG. I'm saying that Manny Pacquiao wouldn't make the wisest decision by stepping into the ring with Kell Brook. consider brook as king of the 2nd tier welters. i do not believe he stands a chance against pac. compare their resumes Who cares about their resumes when Pacquiao is 36 years old? He's not the guy that fought Oscar or Cotto. That guy is gone and will never return.

Kell will probably knock Pac out, that dude is strong as an ox. He was man handling Shawn Porter in the clinch and Porter is strong, but he couldn't move Kell Brook around, this dude is solid muscle and probably the biggest welterweight in terms of strength and power, he is the Wlad Klitschko of Welters, similar style as Wlad too, hit and clinch, and both got power and use their grabbing to way and tire their opponents down.

I like Kell to win via stoppage. Biggest guy Manny will have faced, brilliant jab and timing, big power, doesn't reach with his shots....yeah, I'll put all my points on Kell if it happens.

Talking like a real groupie LOL Broner one of the greatest lol Comeon man. When he wins a big fight let me know. Even the sh*tty Algieri made easy work of Taylor. Broner is not Mayweather, get that in ur head. Broner will never be an ATG, get that in ur head. Please man, be real :bounce: Floyd is better than Manny Igot no problem with this but now ur overreacting with ur Broner lol Keep telling yourself that.

Khan is not an ATG. And Pacquiao, is an ATG Just no where near as good as Mayweather. Really shouldn't ever be mentioned in the same breath as Mayweather. But Adrien Broner is going to go down as one of the greatest ever. The Maidana fight was just a bump in the road. Mayweather put out a beautiful blueprint, one that Broner could definitely execute and would definitely beat Pacquiao if he uses it the same way Floyd used it. Talking like a real groupie LOL Broner one of the greatest lol Comeon man. When he wins a big fight let me know. Even the sh*tty Algieri made easy work of Taylor. Broner is not Mayweather, get that in ur head. Broner will never be an ATG, get that in ur head. Please man, be real :bounce: Floyd is better than Manny Igot no problem with this but now ur overreacting with ur Broner lol