WBO is the newest of all 4 so just get rid of them. back to 3, then get rid of the 'ba since they allow 3 champs per division, then that'll leave 2 and i know the ibf and 'bc will work together....itll be better for boxing
I think this is because Tomoki Kameda wants to unify with the WBA (regular) champ McDonnell.most likely because of that. Just like when pirog was stripped because the wbo didn't authorize his fight with ggg
yeah but they gave wbo prominence.
before that wbo was considered a euro promoter thing.
those 3 stars made it a major.
whenever delahoya/barrera had a wbo (MULTIPLE TIMES) and hamed (kept WBO for years over his other belts) the most famous in that division.
IMO the WBO is now a slight level above Euro level....often times it gets kidnapped by a decent fighter over in Germany, the UK or elsewhere and the title holder never faces the best guys in the division....Manny, and Wlad stepped up to unify...the others guys not so much
Hamed actually cleaned out his division before being stripped of it....De La Hoya and Barrera are great fighters but their WBO title fights had their worst opponents they fought for titles
yeah but they gave wbo prominence.
before that wbo was considered a euro promoter thing.
those 3 stars made it a major.
whenever delahoya/barrera had a wbo (MULTIPLE TIMES) and hamed (kept WBO for years over his other belts) the most famous in that division.
The WBO refuses to go to those meetings that the WBC, WBA, and IBF go to. The WBO should just be replaced by the IBO as a main sanctioning body.
F**k the WBO. They aren't worth the time of real champions
#ReplaceWBOwithIBO.
http://www.geocities.jp/wbcjp/1006-IBO-400.jpg
delahoya, hamed, barrera made it a major belt in the 90's.
Hamed actually cleaned out his division before being stripped of it....De La Hoya and Barrera are great fighters but their WBO title fights had their worst opponents they fought for titles
boxing orgs are worthless. they have no say in boxers money so no power.
rather have a TOP RANK, GBP, PREMIER BOXING belts.
or HBO, SHOWTIME, ESPN champion.
you know they have a say in what boxers do.
the WBOgus is the worst major title....If it wasn't for Chris Eubanl, Nigel Benn, and Dariusz Michaelcewski it would have absolutely no notoriety
The 3 major players are working on unifying all the divisions in the next few years so who will really care about who holds that fringe belt anyway
They have the worst set of champions and contenders anyway....Besides Wlad....is their any fighter that is rated the RING/ lineal champion or the number one guy who holds the WBO BELT?
delahoya, hamed, barrera made it a major belt in the 90's.
We're never going to have an undisputed champion again with all this fuckery going on :nonono:
The thing I do give credit to them is that they dont have those silver, interum, emerald blah blah blah extra titles
the WBOgus is the worst major title....If it wasn't for Chris Eubanl, Nigel Benn, and Dariusz Michaelcewski it would have absolutely no notoriety
The 3 major players are working on unifying all the divisions in the next few years so who will really care about who holds that fringe belt anyway
They have the worst set of champions and contenders anyway....Besides Wlad....is their any fighter that is rated the RING/ lineal champion or the number one guy who holds the WBO BELT?
I think you gotta understand the WBO's point of view... they would want their wbo champ to unify with the "full" wba champ not the "regular" champ.
the WBOgus is the worst major title....If it wasn't for Chris Eubanl, Nigel Benn, and Dariusz Michaelcewski it would have absolutely no notoriety
The 3 major players are working on unifying all the divisions in the next few years so who will really care about who holds that fringe belt anyway
They have the worst set of champions and contenders anyway....Besides Wlad....is their any fighter that is rated the RING/ lineal champion or the number one guy who holds the WBO BELT?