I would like to point out some POSITIVES of last nights PBC on NBC TV RATING

I watched the event with 8 other people last night. 1.2 per household is EXTREMELY understated.

RACIST! I was actually going to write a little misnomer in parenthesis about that, but I said fugg it.

1) It won the demo for the night and won it big. Not just 18-49, but the younger 18-34 stat as well. For those of you who are unaware, this is the main thing advertisers look for which bodes well for PBC in future cards. 2) The rating increased every half hour. People were talking and people were interested. More and more viewers jumped on board. This looks good for future cards. 3) The fight peaked with a 3.0, which would have been 3.67m viewers watching the final 6 rds of the Guerrero-THurman card. Which means 3.67m people saw the most entertaining part of the night 4) Nielsen or whoever calculates these numbers decided boxing only has 1.2 people viewing per household. Im no expert, but I have seen a few people who think this is extremely low. For example, UFC on Fox 14 (their latest network show) did a 1.8 rating and got the same amount of viewers. 3.1m So what nielsen is saying is 1.7 people per household watch the UFC while 1.2 watch boxing. Does that make sense for combat sports, especially with the hispanic following boxing has? So if you use what the UFC get last nights show would have had 4.3m viewers with a peak of 5.1m. RACIST! Naw it did good number, Im pretty sure more people saw the boxing then the ufc. just how it is.

I think the result was ok for the first event, what I am worried about is with the matchups Haymon is cooking up in the future I am not sure how successful it can be in the long run. Thurman v. Guerrero was a good maybe even great matchup, but let's look at the rest namely Broner v. Molina, Adonis v. Bika, and Garcia v. Peterson, and Quillin v. Lee. Broner v. Molina was Broner's third tune-up, Adonis fighting Bika is a joke(he is fresh off a loss and moving up in weight), and Garcia v. Peterson is a fight that has lost it's prestige considering Garcia's loss against Herrera and Peterson's sub par performances of late. Quillin v. Lee is a decent match-up but we all know know what Quillin is about, he is not fighting Golovkin and will probably do his utmost to keep his zero. The problem with his model is that while he has pretty good fighters, with the exception of a few, he doesn't have the best in each division. Adonis is not fighting Kovalev, Quillin is not fighting Golovkin, so that means they will be matched easy, especially Quillin. People like to see good match-ups meaning fights were both fighters have a chance of winning, just notice how unpopular Adonis has become of late, not just in here but in Canada. His celebrity centered model can only last so long without the matchups to maintain the celebrity status of his fighters. Also why are these mother****ers in suits?

I really really enjoyed last night's boxing. I feel it was a huge success and I hope it will keep growing! - Bermuda

Let me put it this way. If two shows pulled 10m viewers and one of the shows had 25% 18-49 and the other had 50% 18-49, all the big money would go to the second show. No ones fu*king with Judge Judy Well how many 18-34 yr old are home at 11 or whenever it comes on. That show and advertisers care for the older crowd Boxing wants the young people. You're not gonna see any Viagra commercials during pbc The whole reason why PBC and network television exists is to sell commercials. If Viagra wanted to buy airtime I guarantee Haymon would jump at it. The fact is PBC lost to CBS and ABC which was a rerun. You can try and spin the demo stats but that doesn't matter. Ratings do. Thats why they always mention them first.

This is a common misconception Judge Judy gets 10 million viewers a day and most of them are older people and shes by far the highest paid person on TV. Advertisers want ratings first, demo comes 2nd. Well how many 18-34 yr old are home at 11 or whenever it comes on. That show and advertisers care for the older crowd Boxing wants the young people. You're not gonna see any Viagra commercials during pbc

This is a common misconception Judge Judy gets 10 million viewers a day and most of them are older people and shes by far the highest paid person on TV. Advertisers want ratings first, demo comes 2nd. Let me put it this way. If two shows pulled 10m viewers and one of the shows had 25% 18-49 and the other had 50% 18-49, all the big money would go to the second show.

1) It won the demo for the night and won it big. Not just 18-49, but the younger 18-34 stat as well. For those of you who are unaware, this is the main thing advertisers look for which bodes well for PBC in future cards. 2) The rating increased every half hour. People were talking and people were interested. More and more viewers jumped on board. This looks good for future cards. 3) The fight peaked with a 3.0, which would have been 3.67m viewers watching the final 6 rds of the Guerrero-THurman card. Which means 3.67m people saw the most entertaining part of the night 4) Nielsen or whoever calculates these numbers decided boxing only has 1.2 people viewing per household. Im no expert, but I have seen a few people who think this is extremely low. For example, UFC on Fox 14 (their latest network show) did a 1.8 rating and got the same amount of viewers. 3.1m So what nielsen is saying is 1.7 people per household watch the UFC while 1.2 watch boxing. Does that make sense for combat sports, especially with the hispanic following boxing has? So if you use what the UFC get last nights show would have had 4.3m viewers with a peak of 5.1m. This is a common misconception Judge Judy gets 10 million viewers a day and most of them are older people and shes by far the highest paid person on TV. Advertisers want ratings first, demo comes 2nd. Judge Judy Just Made $280 Million Home ***8250; Articles ***8250; Entertainment March 3, 2015 by Brian Warner We recently posted an article that listed the highest paid TV stars in the world. We publish this list every year, and every year people seem to be surprised by the person who ranks #1. Contrary to what you might assume, the #1 person is not someone like Ashton Kutcher (who earned $16.6 million per year for Two and Half Men), or David Letterman (who earns $20 million per year for his Late Show), or even Matt Lauer (who earns $25 million for The Today Show). The #1 person's show doesn't even air in prime time or on a consistent. For most American TV viewers, her show airs at 4pm, and the actual channel varies from city to city. Of course, we are talking about the one and only Judy Sheindlin. Better known as Judge Judy. And for those of you who love Judy, I have good news! She won't be going anywhere anytime soon***8230; Late last night, Armando Nunez, the President of CBS Global Distribution, announced that a deal had been reached that will keep Judge Judy under contract through 2020. The deal reportedly also includes a first look production deal with Scheindlin's production company, Queen Bee Productions, for any potential new show concepts. Last year, Queen Bee and CBS successfully launched a new show called "Hot Bench" which has since gone on to become one of the highest-rated daytime shows, with an average of 2.3 million viewers. "Judge Judy," which Scheindlin has hosted since 1996, is currently the highest-rated show in all of TV syndication. The show averages more than 10 million viewers every day, which leaves other shows like Dr. Phil and Ellen in the dust. By comparison, "Ellen Degeneres" averages around 4 million viewers per day. According to the Hollywood Reporter, "Judge Judy" has been the #1 highest rated judge show for 969 straight weeks. Show Me The Money Under her current deal, Judy earns an astonishing $47 million per year. Assuming she did not take a paycut with her new deal (which is probably unlikely), Judy's six year extension would be worth $282 million. If she got just a 10% raise, the deal would be worth $310 million ($51.7 million per year). Also keep in mind that Judy reportedly only works 52 days a year. That's pretty sweet when you consider the fact that the median American judge earns $120,000 per year. On the low end, many judges earn roughly $58,000 per year. The top 10% highest-paid judges earn around $170,000 per year. In 2014, the Supreme Court judges will each earn $255,500 per year, which means Judge Judy earns roughly 180 times what a Supreme Court justice makes. So in other words: The verdict is in and Judge Judy is loaded! Share This on Facebook

thank you. all this negative talk of boxing really had me feeling down :(. people will find anything to complain :) including myself, unfortunately :P boxing shall grow even bigger!!