Gennedy Golovkin is the undisputed greatest middle weight ever

McClellan would have mopped the floor with Golovkin... McClellan only ever had 3 legit fights before Benn. Former JMW - Julius Jackson 2x and an overrated past his prime Mugabi. That's not opinion, that's fact.

Settle down.....what do you have,a picture of a sweaty GGG hanging over your bed.

“Undisputed"? I don't think you know what that word means. “Indisputable" is the word you wanted there, son. Even if you are going to use it stupidly.

Jesus Christ everytime I think you've reached the maximum retardation level you always surprise me with something more retarded. Hed beat Marvin, but hes not presently greater.

He is the best middleweight right now, but ever, not even close. He has yet to fight anyone. He is fun to watch, but who has he beaten that would make you think he is even in the top ten 160 ever? Hagler, Monzon and SRR top3 Bhop, Roy Jones, James Toney next 3 SRL and Hearns (he would have a punchers chance) There is 8 fighters he would probably lose to. So no he is not the greatest.

Prime Toney is better than GGG

Im not sure hes the greatest in terms of having the best resume ever. But I think he would beat Hagler and SRR at middleweight. I mean, success against GGG is lasting the distance with him, that's how you measure success against him. Murray had a very successful night as he lasted longer than anyone else ever did. So if Hagler fought GGG, his victory would be lasting 12 rounds with him, whilst losing a wide decision. Its unlikely Hagler would kill two birds with one stone, ie going the distance and getting a decision. But I think he would beat Hagler and SRR at middleweight Jesus Christ everytime I think you've reached the maximum retardation level you always surprise me with something more retarded.

http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/58275963.jpg

that boy itching to get scalped when he fights a proper fighter of an eligible pigment.

I don't even know who you're trolling the Golovkin azzlickers or the Golovkin haters. Or both? I don't even know.

Way too soon...... GGG might get to that point eventually. I like how often he fights, but until he gets the other perceived elite fighters around and in his weight division to throw down, you can't call him the best Middleweight ever. Until GGG can knock off those on the to do list. (Which he can do when given the opportunity. ) I'll have to give GGG a incomplete grade. Until that time, as far as I'm concerned, it's Marvelous Marvin Hagler. :Thinkingo

If he's undisputed, what's all the fighting about?

How can anyone say GGG is the greatest when the middle weight division today is God awful and he has yet to defeat an elite fighter? I mean, why are people so quick to judge here? This reminds me of when Lucas finished off Peterson and all the fan boys talked like Lucas was this unbeatable boxing God. after Garcia finished him off, the hype went down the toilet. I expect this to happen with GGG.

This thread......is very revealing. You know who is a fanboy and who actually watches the sport.

at 160, no one in history beats him.

Im not sure hes the greatest in terms of having the best resume ever. But I think he would beat Hagler and SRR at middleweight. I mean, success against GGG is lasting the distance with him, that's how you measure success against him. Murray had a very successful night as he lasted longer than anyone else ever did. So if Hagler fought GGG, his victory would be lasting 12 rounds with him, whilst losing a wide decision. Its unlikely Hagler would kill two birds with one stone, ie going the distance and getting a decision.

are f*%cking stupid? Hagler destroys GGG. Either by stoppage or lopsided beat down :lol1: :lol1: Get real you bum. Hagler doesn't survive 12 rounds with GGG. Neither does Hearns. Golovkin is stronger, has better conditioning and chin than both. He would stop of them and make them look like the damn overrated rats they are. You people need to stop living in the past and putting fighters on a pedestal just because they are old school. Get ****ing real.

Whenever someone starts a truly ignorant post like this, I try to remind everyone that as good as GGG looks, Donald Curry looked better and how did that turn out? GGG might actually be a quality fighter, but I've seen nothing from him (especially this weekend) that leads me to believe he could ever be considered the best MW ever.

Let's take the thread question and present it a slightly different way.. More like a statement... "AS IF! Any of these ancient boxers are better than Gennady Golovkin." Okay so a few are competitive, but they are confined to the very recent.. And physically larger fighters anyway! Sorry but Hagler don't really cut the mustard. And you can take that Robinson crap and **** RIGHT off back to History section! :lol1: are f*%cking stupid? Hagler destroys GGG. Either by stoppage or lopsided beat down

LMFAO these same fans are the first to turn around and call everybody else a "HYPE JOB" and "OVERRATED" but when it comes to someone they like...."STUPIDITY IS ACCEPTABLE" Can tell most of you are little kids are very immature grown men